Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information (한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지)

Korean Society of Computer Information (한국컴퓨터정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Information Data-based Analysis of Robbery Crimes in America

정보데이터를 활용한 미국 강도죄의 분석

  • 박종렬 (광주여자대학교 경찰법학과) ;
  • 노상욱 (원광대학교 경찰행정학과)
  • Received : 2011.12.20
  • Accepted : 2012.01.10
  • Published : 2012.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study focused on the people harmed by violent offenders, especially by rubberies. Trends capture changes in victimization rates overtime, while patterns indicate connections between the attributes of victims and the frequency with which they are targeted. Data from the UCR and the NCVS indicate that many types of victimization are taking place less frequently since their peak years in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Cumulative risks indicate the odds of being victimized over the course of a lifetime. Differential risks underscore which categories of people are victimized more often than others.

본 논문에서는 폭력사건범- 특히 강도에 의해 상해를 당하는 사람들을 집중적으로 다루어 보았다. 시간이 흐르면서 범죄피해 발생수가 변하고 있으며 피해자의 태도와 범행 대상이 되는 빈도와의 상관관계 간에 형태의 변화도 볼 수 있다. UCR와 NCVS자료를 통해서 1980년대와 1990년대 초 정점에 달한 이후 범죄피해 유형 중 다수는 발생 빈도가 줄어들고 있음을 보여주고 있다. 누적위험을 통해서 일생을 통해 피해자가 될 수 있는 가능성을 보여주고 있다. 차등 위험에서는 인구통계학적 집단별로 범죄 피해자가 되는 비율이 다르다는 사실을 강조하고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. In- Seob Choi, Comparative Analysis of ViolentCrime Trends in Major Countries Including Korea. Korean Institute of Criminology, p.35-36, 2004.
  2. Seo Chul Won, The Criminal law of American, Beob won Co, p.194-196, 1995.
  3. Cook, P. (1987). Robbery violence. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 78(2), 357-377. https://doi.org/10.2307/1143453
  4. Block, R., & Skogan, W. (1986, Winter). Resistance and nonfatal outcomes in stranger-to-stranger predatory crime. Violence and Victims 1(4), 241-254.
  5. Kleck, G., DeLone, M. (1993). Victim resistanceand offender weapon effects in robbery. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9(1), 55-81.
  6. Ziegenhagen, E., & Brosnan, D. (1985). Victimresponses to robbery and crime control policy. Criminology, 23(4), 675-695. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1985.tb00369.x
  7. Celona, L., Williams, B., Greene, L. (2005, November 21). Shot Brooklyn cop acted as every victim should. New York Post, p. 5.
  8. Loftin, C. (1986). The validity of robbery murder classifications in Baltimore. Violence and Victims 1(3), 191-202.
  9. Zimring., & Zuehl, J. (1986, January). Victim injury and death in urban robbery: A Chicago study. Journal of Legal Studies, 15(1), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1086/467802
  10. Block, R., Felson, M., & Block, C. (1985). Crime victimization rates for incumbents of 246 occupations. Sociology and Social Research, 69(3), 442-449.
  11. Koppel, H. (1987). Lifetime likelihood of victimization: BJS Technical Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
  12. Andrew Karmen, Crime Victims, An Introduction to Victimology, Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, 70-106, 2006.