Coupled systems mechanics

  • 제1권3호
  • /
  • Pages.247-268
  • /
  • 2012
  • /
  • 2234-2184(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-2192(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Dynamic response analysis of floating offshore wind turbine with different types of heave plates and mooring systems by using a fully nonlinear model

  • Waris, Muhammad Bilal (Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Sultan Qaboos University) ;
  • Ishihara, Takeshi (Department of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Tokyo)
  • 투고 : 2012.07.25
  • 심사 : 2012.09.09
  • 발행 : 2012.09.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

A finite element model is developed for dynamic response prediction of floating offshore wind turbine systems considering coupling of wind turbine, floater and mooring system. The model employs Morison's equation with Srinivasan's model for hydrodynamic force and a non-hydrostatic model for restoring force. It is observed that for estimation of restoring force of a small floater, simple hydrostatic model underestimates the heave response after the resonance peak, while non-hydrostatic model shows good agreement with experiment. The developed model is used to discuss influence of heave plates and modeling of mooring system on floater response. Heave plates are found to influence heave response by shifting the resonance peak to longer period, while response after resonance is unaffected. The applicability of simplified linear modeling of mooring system is investigated using nonlinear model for Catenary and Tension Legged mooring. The linear model is found to provide good agreement with nonlinear model for Tension Leg mooring while it overestimates the surge response for Catenary mooring system. Floater response characteristics under different wave directions for the two types of mooring system are similar in all six modes but heave, pitch and roll amplitudes is negligible in tension leg due to high restraint. The reduced amplitude shall lead to reduction in wind turbine loads.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Barltrop, N. (1993), "Multiple floating offshore wind farm (MUFOW)", Wind Eng., 17(4), 183-188.
  2. Bertacchi, P., Di Monaco, A., de Gerloni, M. and Ferranti, G. (1994), "ELOMAR-A moored platform for wind turbines", Wind Eng., 18(4), 189-198.
  3. Bulder, B.H., van Hees, M.T., Hendeson, A., Huijsmans, R.H.M., Pierik, J.T.G., Snijders, E.J.B., Wijnants, G.H. and Woft, M.J. (2002), Study to feasibility of and boundary conditions for floating offshore wind turbines, Public report 2002-CMC-R43, ECN, MARIN, MSC, Lagerwey the Windmaster, TNO, TUD,.
  4. Caughey, T.K. (1960), "Classical normal modes in damped linear systems", J. Appl. Mech., 27, 269-271. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3643949
  5. Chakrabarti, S. (1987), Hydrodynamics of offshore structures, Computational mechanics publications.
  6. Chakrabarti, S. (2005), Handbook of Offshore Engineering, Elsevier Ocean Engineering Series, 1st Ed.
  7. Chaplin, J.R. http://www.civil.soton.ac.uk/hydraulics/download/downloadtable.htm.
  8. Cook, R.D., Malkus, D.S. and Plesha, M.E. (1989), Concepts and applications of finite element analysis, 3rd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc, ISBN 0-471-84788-7.
  9. Haslum, H.A. (1999), Alternative shape of spar platforms for use in hostile areas, Offshore Technology Conference.
  10. Henderson, A. and Patel, M. (1998), "Rigid-body motion of a floating offshore wind farm", Int. J. Ambient Energy, 19(3) , 167-180.
  11. IEC 61400-3 (2007), 1st Ed., Wind turbines - Part 3: Design requirements for offshore wind turbines.
  12. Ishihara, T. and Yamaguchi, A. (2005), Offshore potential in Japan - Offshore resource assessment using a mesoscale model and GIS, Windtech International, 18-21.
  13. Ishihara, T., Phuc, P.V., Sukegawa, H., Shimada, K. and Ohyama, T. (2007), "A study on the dynamic response of a semi-submersible floating offshore wind turbine system Part 1: water tank test with considering the effect of wind load", Proceedings of the ICWE12, Australia.
  14. Jonkman, J.M. (2007), Dynamic modeling and load analysis of an offshore floating wind turbine, Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University of Colorado, Ph.D Thesis.
  15. Ju, S.H., Ston,e J.J. and Rowlands, R.E. (1995), "A new symmetric contact element stiffness matrix for frictional contact problems", Comput. Struct., 54(2), 289-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(94)E0176-3
  16. Kanda, M., Miyajima, S., Nakagawa, H. and Shimazaki, K. (1998), "A nonlinear coupled response of TLP hull and tendons in waves", Proceedings of the17th International conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, OMAE-0472.
  17. Morison, J.R. et al. (1950), "The force exerted by surface waves on piles, Petroleum Transactions", AIME, 18, 149-157.
  18. Motora, S.Z., Koyama, T.O., Fujino, M.T. and Maeda, H.A. (1997), Dynamics of ships and offshore structures [in Japanese]
  19. NMRI-National Marine Research Institute: http://www.nmri.go.jp/index_e.html.
  20. Offshore Industry (2009), 2(4), 48-51.
  21. Offshore Standard DNV-OS-J101 (2004), Design of offshore wind turbine structures.
  22. Phuc, P.V. and Ishihara, T. (2007), "A study on the dynamic response of a semi-submersible floating offshore wind turbine system Part 2: Numerical simulation", Proceedings of the ICWE12, Australia.
  23. Sarpkaya, T. and Isaacson, M. (1981), Mechanics of wave forces on offshore structures, Van Norstrand Reinhold.
  24. Shimada, K., Miyakawa, M., Ohyama, T., Ishihara, T., Fukumoto, Y., Anno, K., Okada, H. and Moriya, Y. (2010), "Preliminal study on optimum design of a Tension Leg platform for the offshore wind generated energy system", Proceedings of the Renewable Energy Conference, O-WdOc-2.
  25. Shimizu, M. and Sato, J. (1997), "An analysis of a transmission tower and cable system's sleet-jump", J. Struct. Eng. - ASCE, 43, 403-413.
  26. Srinivasan, N., Chakrabarti, S. and Radha, R. (2005), "Damping controlled response of a truss pontoon semisubmersible with heave plates", Proceedings of the 24th International Conference of OMAE, Halkidiki, Greece.
  27. Tong, K.C., Quarton, D.C. and Standing, R. (1993), "Float-a floating offshore wind turbine system, in Wind energy conversion", Proceedings of the 1993 BWEA Wind Energy Conference, York, England.
  28. Waris, M.B. (2010), Fully nonlinear finite element model for dynamic response analysis of floating offshore wind turbine system, Ph. D dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Japan.
  29. Wilson, E.L., Penzien, J. (1972), "Evaluation of orthogonal damping matrices", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 4(1), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620040103

피인용 문헌

  1. A Delay Vector Variance based Marker for an Output-Only Assessment of Structural Changes in Tension Leg Platforms vol.628, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/628/1/012059
  2. Passive control of floating offshore wind turbine nacelle and spar vibrations by multiple tuned mass dampers vol.22, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1666
  3. Impact of spar-nacelle-blade coupling on the edgewise response of floating offshore wind turbines vol.2, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/csm.2013.2.3.231
  4. Period doubling of the nonlinear dynamical system of an electrostatically actuated micro-cantilever vol.14, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2014.14.5.743
  5. Dynamic response signatures of a scaled model platform for floating wind turbines in an ocean wave basin vol.373, pp.2035, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0078
  6. Prediction of Tower Loading of Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Systems in the Extreme Wind and Wave Conditions vol.38, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1260/0309-524X.38.5.463
  7. Layout optimization for multi-platform offshore wind farm composed of spar-type floating wind turbines vol.20, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2015.20.6.751
  8. Semi-active control of vibrations of spar type floating offshore wind turbines vol.18, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2016.18.4.683
  9. On the Modeling of Spar-Type Floating Offshore Wind Turbines vol.569-570, pp.1662-9795, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.569-570.636
  10. Monitoring system for the wind-induced dynamic motion of 1/100-scale spar-type floating offshore wind turbine vol.24, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2017.24.4.333
  11. Dynamic Modeling and Simulation of a Spar Floating Offshore Wind Turbine With Consideration of the Rotor Speed Variations vol.141, pp.8, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4043104
  12. Elastic response of a light-weight floating support structure of FOWT with guywire supported tower vol.24, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-018-0614-7
  13. Numerical study of distributed hydrodynamic forces on a circular heave plate by large-eddy simulations with volume of fluid method vol.15, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2019.1661630
  14. Demonstration Experiment and Numerical Simulation Analysis of Full-Scale Barge-Type Floating Offshore Wind Turbine vol.8, pp.11, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8110880
  15. Use of Kane’s Method for Multi-Body Dynamic Modelling and Control of Spar-Type Floating Offshore Wind Turbines vol.14, pp.20, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206635