DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Stimulus Artifact Suppression Using the Stimulation Synchronous Adaptive Impulse Correlated Filter for Surface EMG Application

  • Yeom, Ho-Jun (Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Eulji Univ.) ;
  • Park, Ho-Dong (MEZOO Inc.) ;
  • Chang, Young-Hui (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yonsei Univ., Department of Applied Physiology/Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Tech) ;
  • Park, Young-Chol (Department of Computer & Telecommunications Engineering, Yonsei Univ.) ;
  • Lee, Kyoung-Joung (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yonsei Univ., Department of Applied Physiology/Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Tech)
  • Received : 2011.05.17
  • Accepted : 2012.02.01
  • Published : 2012.05.01

Abstract

The voluntary EMG (vEMG) signal from electrically stimulated muscle is very useful for feedback control in functional electrical stimulation. However, the recorded EMG signal from surface electrodes has unwanted stimulation artifact and M-wave as well as vEMG. Here, we propose an event-synchronous adaptive digital filter for the suppression of stimulation artifact and M-wave in this application. The proposed method requires a simple experimental setup that does not require extra hardware connections to obtain the reference signals of adaptive digital filter. For evaluating the efficiency of this proposed method, the filter was tested and compared with a least square (LS) algorithm using previously measured data. We conclude that the cancellation of both primary and residual stimulation artifacts is enhanced with an event-synchronous adaptive digital filter and shows promise for clinical application to rehabilitate paretic limbs. Moreover because this algorithm is far simpler than the LS algorithm, it is portable and ready for real-time application.

Keywords

References

  1. D. N. Rushton, "Functional electrical stimulation," Physiological Measurement, vol. 18, pp. 241-275, Nov 1997. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/18/4/001
  2. S. L. Wolf, "Electromyographic biofeedback applications to stroke patients - A critical review," Physical Therapy, vol. 63, pp. 1448-1459, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/63.9.1448
  3. P. H. Peckham and J. S. Knutson, "Functional electrical stimulation for neuromuscular applications," Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 7, pp. 327-360, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bioeng.6.040803.140103
  4. J. Cauraugh, K. Light, S. Kim, M. Thigpen, and A. Behrman, "Chronic motor dysfunction after stroke - Recovering wrist and finger extension by electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation," Stroke, vol. 31, pp. 1360-1364, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.31.6.1360
  5. T. Keller, A. Curt, M. R. Popovic, A. Signer, and V. Dietz, "Grasping in high lesioned tetraplegic subjects using the EMG controlled neuroprosthesis," Neurorehabilitation, vol. 10, pp. 251-255, Apr 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8135(97)00057-7
  6. H. Yeom and Y. H. Chang, "Autogenic EMGcontrolled functional electrical stimulation for ankle dorsiflexion control," Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 193, pp. 118-125, Oct 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.08.011
  7. C. Frigo, M. Ferrarin, W. Frasson, E. Pavan, and R. Thorsen, "EMG signals detection and processing for on-line control of functional electrical stimulation," Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, vol. 10, pp. 351-360, Oct 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1050-6411(00)00026-2
  8. R. Thorsen, M. Ferrarin, and P. Veltink, "Enhancement of isometric ankle dorsiflexion by automyoelectrically controlled functional electrical stimulation on subjects with upper motor neuron lesions," Neuromodulation, vol. 5, pp. 256-263, Oct 2002. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1403.2002.02035.x
  9. R. Merletti, M. Knaflitz, and C. J. Deluca, "Electrically evoked myoelectric signals," Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, vol. 19, pp. 293-340, 1992.
  10. J. M. J. Minzly, N. Hakim, and A. Liberson, "Stimulus artifact suppressor for EMG recording during FES by a constant-current stimulator," Med. Biol. Eng. Comput, vol. 31, pp. 72-75, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02446897
  11. E. B. a. E. U. Haxthausen, "Current conveyor based EMG amplifier with shutdown control," Electron. Lett, vol. 27, pp. 2172-2174, Nov. 1991 1991. https://doi.org/10.1049/el:19911344
  12. S. Haykin, Adaptive Filter Theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 2002.
  13. F. B.-S. Sennels, O.T. Andersen, and S.D. Hansen, "Functional neuromuscular stimulation controlled by surface electromyographic signals produced by volitional activation of the same muscle," IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng, vol. 5, pp. 195-206, June 1997 1997. https://doi.org/10.1109/86.593293
  14. B. S. F. Sennels S., Andersen O.T, Hansen S.D., "Functional neuromuscular stimulation controlled by surface electromyographic signals produced by volitional activation of the same muscle: adaptive removal of the muscle response from the recorded EMG-signal," IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering, vol. 5 pp. 195-206 Jun 1997. https://doi.org/10.1109/86.593293
  15. H. J. Yeom, Y. C. Park, and Y. H. Chang, "Eigen filter to detect volitional EMG signals in autogenic EMGcontrolled FES," Electronics Letters, vol. 43, pp. 1410-1411, Dec 2007. https://doi.org/10.1049/el:20072261
  16. J. Z. H. Z. Q. Wu, and J.M. Bowman, "Inverse perturbation via singular value decomposition: Application to correction of potential surface for HCN," J. Chem. Phys., vol. 107, pp. 3602-3610, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.474699
  17. J. R. Laguna P, Meste O, Poon PW, Caminal P, Rix H, Thakor NV., "Adaptive filter for event-related bioelectric signals using an impulse correlated reference input: comparison with signal averaging techniques," IEEE Trans Biomed Eng., vol. 39, pp. 1032-44, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.161335
  18. N. Kim, "A Least Squares Approach to Escalator Algorithms for Adaptive Filtering," ETRI, vol. 28, pp. 155-161, April 2006. https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.06.0105.0054

Cited by

  1. Hardware System for Real-Time EMG Signal Acquisition and Separation Processing during Electrical Stimulation vol.39, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-015-0267-6
  2. A Stimulus Artifact Removal Technique for SEMG Signal Processing During Functional Electrical Stimulation vol.62, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2015.2407834