DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Vibration Fatigue on Compression Strength of Corrugated Fiberboard Containers for Packaging of Fruits during Transport

  • Jung, Hyun-Mo (Dept. of Visual Design, Kyongbuk Science University) ;
  • Park, Jeong-Gil (Dept. of Biosystems Machinery Engineering, Chungnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2012.01.12
  • 심사 : 2012.02.28
  • 발행 : 2012.02.25

초록

Purpose: The compression strength of corrugated fiberboard containers used to package agricultural products rapidly decreases owing to various environmental factors encountered during the distribution of unitized products. The main factors affecting compression strength are moisture absorption, long-term top load, and fatigue caused by shock and vibration during transport. This study characterized the durability of corrugated fiberboard containers for packaging fruits and vegetables under simulated transportation conditions. Methods: Compression tests were done after corrugated fiberboard containers containing fruit were vibrated by an electro-dynamic vibration test system using the power spectral density of routes typically traveled to transport fruits and vegetables in South Korea. Results: To predict loss of compression strength owing to vibration fatigue, a multiple nonlinear regression equation ($r^2=0.9217$, $RMSE=0.6347$) was developed using three independent variables of initial container compression strength, namely top stacked weight, loading weight, and vibration time. To test the applicability of our model, we compared our experimental results with those obtained during a road test in which peaches were transported in corrugated containers. Conclusions: The comparison revealed a highly significant ($p{\leq}0.05$) relationship between the experimental and road-test results.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ASTM. 2005. D642-00: Standard methods for determining compressive resistance of shipping containers, components, and unit loads. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
  2. ASTM. 2007. D685-93: Standard practice for conditioning paper and paper products for testing. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
  3. Burgess, G., S. P. Singh and M. Srinangyam. 2005. Predicting collapse times for corrugated boxes under constant top load using short-term creep tests. Journal of Testing and Evaluation 33(4):284-286.
  4. Choi, S. R., Y. H. Lee, D. S. Choi and M. S. Kim. 2010. Damage at the peach due to vibrational Stress during transportation simulation test. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 35(3):182-188 (In Korean). https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2010.35.3.182
  5. Gartaganis, P. A. 1975. Strength properties of corrugated containers. Tappi 58(11):102-108.
  6. Godshell, W. D. 1968. Effects of vertical dynamic loading on corrugated fiberboard containers. Research Paper FPL 94. Madison, WI: Forest Products Laboratory.
  7. Jung, H. M., M. S. Kim and R. Auras. 2010. Effects of packaging materials processed with oak charcoal on the quality of oriental pears during storage and distribution. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 35(5): 316-322 (In Korean). https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2010.35.5.316
  8. Kim, M. S. and H. M. Jung. 2002. Vibration characteristics of corrugated fiberboard boxes for packages of pears. Journal of the Korean Society for Agricultural Machinery 27(5):391-398 (In Korean).
  9. Kim, M. S., H. M. Jung and K. B. Kim. 2004. Vibration analysis of pears in packaged freight using finite element method. Journal of the Korean Society for Agricultural Machinery 29(6):501-507 (In Korean).
  10. Kim, G. S. 2007. Vibration behavior of the fruits and the packaged freight and their quality changes at simulated transportation environment. BS Thesis. Daejeon, Korea: Chungnam National University, Department of Biosystems Machinery Engineering.
  11. Kim, G. S., J. M. Park and M. S. Kim. 2010. Functional shock responses of the pear according to the combination of the packaging cushioning materials. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 35(5):323-329 (In Korean). https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2010.35.5.323
  12. Koning, J. W. and R. K. Stern. 1977. Long-term creep in corrugated fiberboard containers. Tappi 60(12):128-131.
  13. Leake, C. H. 1988. Measuring corrugated box performance. Tappi Journal Oct.:71-75.
  14. McKEE, R. C., J. W. Gander and J. R. Wachuta. 1963. Compression strength formula for corrugated boxes. Paperboard Packaging (Aug.):144-159.
  15. Nada, S. 1961. The influence of vibration on the compressive strength and deflection at maximum compression of U.S. and Japanese B-flute corrugated containers. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, College of Agriculture.
  16. Park, J. M., S. H. Kwon and M. S. Kim. 1994. Improvement and analysis of stacking durability of corrugated fiberboard boxes for agricultural products - Moisture absorption properties and compressive strength reduction -. Journal of the Korean Society for Agricultural Machinery 19(4):358-368 (In Korean).
  17. Park, J. M., M. S. Kim and S. W. Joung. 1995. Static cushioning properties of corrugated fiberboard and creep behavior of boxes. Journal of the Korean Society for Agricultural Machinery 20(4):323-332 (In Korean).
  18. Park, J. M. and S. W. Kwon. 2002. Finite element analysis of a ventilating box structure. Journal of the Korean Society for Agricultural Machinery 27(6):557-564 (In Korean). https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2002.27.6.557
  19. Pratheepthingthong, S. 1999. Loss of compression strength in corrugated boxes during overnight shipments in UPS. MS thesis. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
  20. Rouillard, V. and M. A. Sek. 2000. Monitoring and simulating non-stationary vibrations for package optimization. Packaging Technology and Sciences 13:149-156. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1522(200007)13:4<149::AID-PTS508>3.0.CO;2-A
  21. Singh, S. P. 1987. The effect of mechanical shocks on the compressive strength of corrugated containers. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, School of Packaging.
  22. Timothy, G. W. and S. W. Marshall. 1999. The effect of pallet connection stiffness, deck stiffness and static load level on the resonant response of pallet decks to vibration frequencies occurring in the distribution environment. Packaging Technology and Science 12(2): 47-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1522(199903/04)12:2<47::AID-PTS446>3.0.CO;2-V
  23. Urbanik, T. J. and B. Frank. 2006. Box compression analysis of world-wide data spanning 46 years. Wood and Fiber Science 38(3):399-416.