DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국, 일본, 중국, 미국의 경쟁과 부에 대한 인식과 사회신뢰

Perception of Competition and Wealth and Social Trust in Korea, Japan, China, and U.S.A.

  • 투고 : 2011.09.12
  • 심사 : 2011.12.08
  • 발행 : 2012.03.31

초록

Other-regarding preferences (such as trust, reciprocity and altruism) between companies, between consumers and retailers, and between employers and employees are integral elements in determining economic performance. Social trust which is a core element of social capital, especially, is known to reduce transaction costs, help solve collective action problems, and contribute to economic, social, and political development. Therefore, social trust has been given a great deal of attention across an array of academic disciplines for its role in promoting cooperation among individuals and groups, and for its positive influence on economic performance. Most studies describe Korea as a low-trust society than Japan or China. To identify the causes of social trust, this paper focuses on differences of social values (perception on competition and wealth accumulation) in 4 countries (Japan, China, Korea, and United States). Based on World Values Survey data, this paper analyzes effects of the social values on social trust. Social trust was measured by degree to which a respondent thinks that most people can be trusted. Perception on competition was measured by the degree to which a respondent thinks that competition is harmful, and perception on wealth accumulation was done by the degree to which a respondent thinks that wealth can grow so there is enough for everyone. The results showed that social trust was affected by perception on competition and wealth accumulation. A respondent showed higher level of social trust when he (or she) perceived positively competition and wealth accumulation. For enhancing social trust in a country, it is not easy to reduce income inequality and corruption which were reported as causes of social trust by previous studies. Compared to them, social values can be changed more easily by various concrete measures like education and mass-media. Differently from previous studies this paper stresses the concrete measures to enhance social trust in a country.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 삼성경제연구소, 한국의 사회갈등과 경제적 비용, CEO Information, 제710호, 2009.
  2. Arrow, K., "Gifts and Exchanges," Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol.1(1972), pp.343-362.
  3. Barber, B., The Logic and Limit of Trust, New Brunswick, N.J. : Rutgers University Press, 1983.
  4. Barney, J.B. and M.H. Hansen, "Reciprocation as a source of competitive advantage," Strategic Management Journal, XV(1994), pp.175-190.
  5. Baron, R.M. and D.A. Kenny, "The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research : Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.51(1986), pp.1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  6. Berg, J., J. Dickhaut, and K. McCabe, "Trust, reciprocity, and social history," Games and Economic Behavior, Vol.10(1995), pp.122-142. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1027
  7. Berggren, N. and H. Jordahl, "Free to Trust : Economic Freedom and Social Capital," Kyklos, Vol.59(2006), pp.141-169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.2006.00324.x
  8. Blount, S., "When Social Outcomes Aren't Fair : The effect of causal attributions on preferences," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol.63(1995), pp.131-144. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1068
  9. Bohnet, I. and S.B. Frey, "The Sound of Silence in Prisoner's Dilemma and Dictator Games," Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol.28(1999), pp.43-57.
  10. Bolton, G.E. and R. Zwick, "Anonymity Versus Punishment in Ultimatum Bargaining," Games and Economic Behavior, Vol.10(1995), pp.95-121. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1026
  11. Buchan, N.R., R.T.A. Croson, and R. M. Dawes, "Swift Neighbors and Persistent Strangers : A Cross-Cultural Investigation of Trust and Reciprocity in Social Exchange," American Journal of Sociology, Vol.108(2002), pp.168-208. https://doi.org/10.1086/344546
  12. Buchan, N.R., E.J. Johnson, and R.T. Croson, "Let's Get Personal : An International Examination of the Influence of Communication, Culture and Social Distance on Other Regarding Preferences," Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, xxx(2005), pp.1-23.
  13. Camerer, C.F. and R.H. Thaler, "Ultimatums, Dictators and Manners," The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol.9(1995), pp.209-219.
  14. Cho, K. and B. Choi, "A Cross-Society Study of Trust and Reciprocity : Korea, Japan, and the U.S.," International Studies Review, Vol.3(2000), pp.31-43.
  15. Cvetkovich, G., "The attribution of social trust, In G. Cvetkovich and R. Löfstedt (Eds.)," Social trust and the management of risk, London : Earthscan, (1999), pp.53-61
  16. Earle, T.C. and G.T. Cvetkovich, "Social trust : Toward a cosmopolitan society," Westport, CT : Praeger, 1995.
  17. Fischer, J.A.V., "Is Competition Good For Trust? Cross-country Evidence Using Microdata," Economics Letters, Vol.100(2008), pp.56-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2007.11.001
  18. Fukuyama, F., Trust : The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, New York : Free Press, 1995.
  19. Handgraaf, M.J.J., Van Dijk, E., and D. De Cremer, "Social Utility in Ultimatum Bargaining," Social Justice Research, Vol.16, No.3(2003), pp.263-283. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025940829543
  20. Hargen, J.M. and S. Choe, "Trust in Japanese Interfirm Relations : Institutional Sanctions Matter," Academy of Management Review, Vol.23, No.3(1998), pp.601-620.
  21. Inglehart, R., "World Values Survey," Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press, 1998.
  22. Kim, Y.H. and J. Son, "Trust, Cooperation and Social Risk : A Cross-Cultural Comparison," Korea Journal, Spring(1998), pp.131-153.
  23. Knack, S. and P. Keefer, "Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross Country Investigation," Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.112(1997), pp.1251-1288. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300555475
  24. Kramer, R.M., C.G. McClintock, and D.M. Messick, "Social Values and Cooperative Response to a Simulated Resource Conservation Crisis," Journal of Personality, Vol.54(1986), pp.576-592. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00413.x
  25. Loewenstein, G.F., L. Thompson, and M.H. Bazerman, "Social Utility and Decision Making in Interpersonal Contexts," Journal of Personality and Socical Psychology, Vol.57(1989), pp.426-441. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.3.426
  26. Messick, D.M. and K.P. Sentis, "Estimating Social and Nonsocial Utility Functions from Ordinal Data," European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol.15(1985), pp.389-399. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420150403
  27. Portes, A., "Social Capital : Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology," Annual Review of Sociology, Vol.24(1998), pp.1-24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1
  28. Putnam, R.D., "Making Democracy Work : Civic Traditions in Modern Italy," Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, 1993.
  29. Siegrist, M., G. Cvetkovich, and C. Roth, "Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception," Risk Analysis, Vol.20(2000), pp.353-362. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.203034
  30. The World Bank, Where is the Wealth of Nations?-Measuring Capital for 21st Century, Whashington, D.C., The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The World Bank, 2006.
  31. Van Dijk, E. and R. Vermunt, "Strategy and Fairness in Social Decision Making : Sometimes it pays to be powerless," Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.36(2000), pp.1-25. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1392
  32. Van Lange, P.A.M., "The Pursuit of Joint Outcomes and Equality in Outcomes : An Integrative Model of Social Value Orientations," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.77(1999), pp.337-349. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.337
  33. Van Lange, P.A.M. and D.M. Kuhlman, "Social Value Orientations and Impressions of Partner's Honesty and Intelligence : A test of the morality effect," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.67(1994), pp.126-141. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.1.126
  34. Yamagishi, T., "Exit from the Group as an Individualistic Solution to the Public Good Problem in the United States and Japan," Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.24(1988), pp.530-554. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(88)90051-0

피인용 문헌

  1. The Influence Factors on the Adoption of Environmental Management Systems in Korean Manufacturing Firms vol.31, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7737/KMSR.2014.31.2.015