References
- Hulsmann M, Schafer E. Problems in endodontics; etiology, diagnosis and treatment. London: Quintessence; 2009. p. 421-34.
- Borg E, Källqvist A, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG. Film and digital radiography for detection of simulated root resorption cavities. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 86 : 110-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90159-7
- Chapnick L. External root resorption: an experimental radiographic evaluation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989; 67 : 578-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(89)90276-4
- Nance RS, Tyndall D, Levin LG, Trope M. Diagnosis of external root resorption using TACT (tuned-aperture computed tomography). Endod Dent Traumatol 2000; 16 : 24-8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-9657.2000.016001024.x
- Westphalen VP, Gomes de Moraes I, Westphalen FH, Martins WD, Souza PH. Conventional and digital radiographic methods in the detection of simulated external root resorption: a comparative study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33 : 233-5. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/65487937
- Kravitz LH, Tyndall DA, Bagnell CP, Dove SB. Assessment of external root resorption using digital subtraction radiography. J Endod 1992; 18 : 275-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80954-4
- Hintze H, Wenzel A, Andreasen FM, Sewerin I. Digital subtraction radiography for assessment of simulated root resorption cavities. Performance of conventional and reverse contrast modes. Endod Dent Traumatol 1992; 8 : 149-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1992.tb00234.x
- da Silveira HL, Silveira HE, Liedke GS, Lermen CA, Dos Santos RB, de Figueiredo JA. Diagnostic ability of computed tomography to evaluate external root resorption in vitro. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007; 36 : 393-6. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/13347073
- Kim E, Kim KD, Roh BD, Cho YS, Lee SJ. Computed tomography as a diagnostic aid for extracanal invasive resorption. J Endod 2003; 29 : 463-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200307000-00009
- Liedke GS, da Silveira HE, Silveira HL, Dutra V, de Figueiredo JA. Influence of voxel size in the diagnostic ability of cone beam tomography to evaluate simulated external root resorption. J Endod 2009; 35 : 233-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.11.005
- Patel S, Dawood A, Wilson R, Horner K, Mannocci F. The detection and management of root resorption lesions using intraoral radiography and cone beam computed tomography - an in vivo investigation. Int Endod J 2009; 42 : 831-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01592.x
- Hahn W, Fricke-Zech S, Fricke J, Gruber RM, Dullin C, Zapf A, et al. Detection and size differentiation of simulated tooth root defects using flat-panel volume computerized tomography (fpVCT). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107 : 272-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.04.030
- Nakata K, Naitoh M, Izumi M, Ariji E, Nakamura H. Evaluation of correspondence of dental Computed Tomography imaging to anatomic observation of external root resorption. J Endod 2009; 35 : 1594-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.05.029
- Estrela C, Bueno MR, De Alencar AH, Mattar R, Valladares Neto J, Azevedo BC, et al. Method to evaluate inflammatory root resorption by using cone beam computed tomography. J Endod 2009; 35 : 1491-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.08.009
- Andreasen FM, Sewerin I, Mandel U, Andreasen JO. Radiographic assessment of simulated root resorption cavities. Endod Dent Traumatol 1987; 3 : 21-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1987.tb00167.x
- Goldberg F, De Silvio A, Dreyer C. Radiographic assessment of simulated external root resorption cavities in maxillary incisors. Endod Dent Traumatol 1998; 14: 133-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1998.tb00826.x
Cited by
- Impact of Voxel Size Variation on CBCT-Based Diagnostic Outcome in Dentistry: a Systematic Review vol.26, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-012-9562-7
- Comparison of in vivo 3D cone-beam computed tomography tooth volume measurement protocols vol.15, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-014-0069-2
- Comparison of the influence of FOV sizes and different voxel resolutions for the assessment of periodontal defects vol.44, pp.7, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20150070
- Cone-beam computed tomography versus periapical radiograph for diagnosing external root resorption: A systematic review and meta-analysis vol.87, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.2319/061916-481.1
- Comparison of linear and volumetric measurements obtained from periodontal defects by using cone beam-CT and micro-CT: an in vitro study vol.23, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2665-x
- Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography with bitewing radiography for detection of periodontal bone loss and assessment of effects of different voxel resolutions: an in vitro study vol.35, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-018-0336-x
- Diagnosis of external root resorption in teeth close and distant to zirconium implants: influence of acquisition parameters and artefacts produced during cone beam computed tomography vol.52, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13065
- The impact of different voxels and exposure parameters of CBCT for the assessment of external root resorptions: A phantom study vol.45, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12354
- Comparative Reliability Assessment of Tooth Volume Measurement with Different Three-Dimensional Imaging Software vol.2020, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5870472
- Evaluation of Risk Factors for External Root Resorption and Dental Caries of Second Molars Associated With Impacted Third Molars vol.78, pp.9, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2020.04.041
- Influence of voxel size on micro-CT analysis of debris after root canal preparation vol.35, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0008