대한물리의학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine)

  • 제7권1호
  • /
  • Pages.125-135
  • /
  • 2012
  • /
  • 1975-311X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7215(eISSN)
대한물리의학회 (The Korean Society of Physical Medicine)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

순환식 장애물 집단 보행 훈련이 뇌졸중 환자의 보행 능력과 정서에 미치는 효과

The Effects of Circuit Obstacle Group Gait Training on Gait and Emotion in Stroke Patients

  • 김철민 (대구대학교 재활과학대학원 물리치료학과) ;
  • 이호정 (선린재활치료센터) ;
  • 최명수 (선린재활치료센터) ;
  • 송주민 (대구대학교 신경과학교실)
  • Kim, Chul-Min (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Rehabilitation Science, Daegu University) ;
  • Lee, Ho-Jung (Sunlin Rehabilitation Medical Center) ;
  • Choi, Myeong-Su (Sunlin Rehabilitation Medical Center) ;
  • Song, Ju-Min (Laboratory of Neuroscience, Daegu University)
  • 투고 : 2012.01.03
  • 심사 : 2012.02.23
  • 발행 : 2012.02.29
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose : This study is designed to demonstrate the effects of circuit obstacle group gait training on walking ability and emotion in stroke patients. Methods : Twenty one patients with stroke were participated in this study. The subjects were divided into control group(n=10) and experimental group(n=11). Circuit obstacle group gait training consisted of walking around obstacles, walking over obstacles, walking up and down slopes and walking up and down stairs. Circuit obstacle group gait training was conducted five times per week, 1 hour per session, for 6 consecutive weeks. At pre-test and post-test, subjects were tested with 10 m walking test, timed up and go test, up and down 4 stairs test, depression and self esteem. Results : After 6 weeks of research, the experimental group showed statistically significant difference in all items when comparing prior to training and after training (p<.05), but the control group showed statistically significant difference in items other than depression and self esteem(p<.05). In the comparison between the two groups, the experimental group showed higher improvement than the control group in the 10 m walking test, timed up and go test, and up and down 4 stairs test, and there was statistically significant difference in decrease of degree in depression between the experimental group and control group(p<.05). Conclusion : This study have shown that circuit obstacle group gait training improves walking ability and emotion in stroke patients.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 권용철, 박종한. 노인용 한국판 Mini-mental State Examination(MMSE-K)의 표준화 연구. 한국정신의학협회. 1989;28(1):125-35.
  2. 권혜민. 수중에서 회전조절과 장애물 훈련이 편마비 환자의 전정기능과 균형조절에 미치는 영향. 동신 대학교 대학원 물리치료학과. 석사학위논문. 2009.
  3. 김상진. 뇌졸중 환자의 후방보행 훈련이 전방보행에 미치는 효과. 대구대학교 재활과학대학원. 석사학위논문. 2009.
  4. 김신균. 트레드밀 경사도 훈련이 만성 뇌졸중 환자의 하지 근육의 활성도와 보행에 미치는 영향. 대구대학교 재활과학대학원. 석사학위논문. 2010.
  5. 박상길. 편마비 노인환자의 근력 및 심리운동 프로 그램 실천 후 체력, 일상생활수행능력, 수단적 일 상생활수행능력, 생활만족도 및 자아존중감 변화. 경기대학교 스포츠과학대학원 스포츠재활전공. 석사학위논문. 2007년.
  6. 박주영. 유산소와 근력운동으로 구성된 복합트레이닝이 뇌졸중 환자의 자아존중감 및 정신건강에 미치는 영향. 한국체육과학회지. 2007;16(3):205-17.
  7. 오장환. 수단적 일상생활수행이 뇌졸중 환자의 우울과 삶의 질에 갖는 영향. 연세대학교 대학원. 석사학위논문. 2010.
  8. 유경태. 이만균. 성순창. 복합운동과 유산소운동 트레이닝이 뇌졸중으로 인한 편마비 환자의 일상생 활체력, 보행능력 및 균형능력에 미치는 영향. 체육과학연구. 2008;:19(2):37-50.
  9. 유유리. 수중운동참여가 편마비 장애인의 자아존중감에 미치는 영향. 군산대학교 교육대학원. 석사학위논문. 2009.
  10. 오복례. 뇌졸중 환자의 자아존중감과 우울감에 대한 미술치료의 효과에 관하여. 한일장신대학교 기독 교사회복지대학원. 석사학위논문. 2006.
  11. 위근수. 계단과 경사로 보행훈련이 편마비 환자의 균형과 보행에 미치는 영향. 대구대학교. 재활과 학대학원. 석사학위논문. 2011
  12. 장종구. 뇌졸중 환자의 삶의 질 관련요인과 재활 동기의 조절효과. 충북대학교 대학원 아동복지학과. 박사학위논문. 2011.
  13. 주명종. 과제 지향 훈련이 뇌졸중 환자의 우울증 및 운동기능에 미치는 영향. 동신대학교 대학원 물 리치료학과. 석사학위논문. 2011.
  14. 한윤희. 재활치료를 통한 뇌졸중 후 우울변화가 인지 및 상지기능회복에 미치는 영향. 인제대학교 작업치료학과. 석사학위논문. 2011.
  15. 황은옥. 지역사회-적응 보행 훈련프로그램이 뇌졸중 환자의 보행기능에 미치는 영향. 대전대학교 보 건스포츠대학원. 석사학위논문. 2010.
  16. 한홍무, 염태호, 신영우, 김교현, 윤도준, 정근재: Beck Depr es sion Inv ent ory의 한국판.
  17. 표준화 연구. 신경정신의학, 25: 487-502, 1986.
  18. Ada L. Dean CM, Hall JM et al. A treadmeal ane overground walking program improves walking in persons residing in the community after stroke: Aplacevo-controlled, randomized trial. Arch phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(10):1486-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00349-6
  19. Asencio G, Pelissier J. Analyse de la marche de l'heipleique adulte. In: Viel E, editor. La marche humaine, la course et le saut. Masson. 2000:151-2.
  20. Bensoussan L, Mesure S, Viton JM et al. Kinematic and kinetic asymmetries in hemiplegic patients' gait initiation patterns. J Rehabil Med. 2006;38: 287-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970600694859
  21. Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L et al. Investigation of a new Motor Assessment Scale for stroke paatient. J Physical Therapy. 1958;65(2):175-179.
  22. Carr JH, Shepherd RB. Stroke rehabilitation. Lodon, Butterworth-Heinemann. 2003.
  23. Courtine G, Schieppati M. Human walking along a curved path. II. Gait features and emg patterns. Eur J Neurosci. 2003;18(1):191-205. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02737.x
  24. Dean CM, Richards CL, Malouin F. Task-Related Circuit Training Improves Performance of Locomotor Tasks in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized, Controlled Pilot Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81: 409-17 https://doi.org/10.1053/mr.2000.3839
  25. Dietz, V. Interaction between central programs and afferent input in the control of posture and locomotion. Journal of Biomechanics. 1996;29: 841-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(95)00175-1
  26. Dobkin BH. Clinical practice. Rehabilitation after stroke. New England Journal of Medicine 2005; 352(16):1677-84.
  27. Duncan P, Studenski S, Richards L et al. Randomized clinical trial of therapeutic exercise in subacute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34(9):2173-80. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000083699.95351.F2
  28. Forster A, Young J. Incidence and consequences of falls due to stroke: A systematic inquiry. Br Med J 1995;311:83-6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.6997.83
  29. Hicks AL. Ginis KA. Treadmill training after spinal cord injury: it's not just about the walking. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development. 2008;45(2):241-8. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2007.02.0022
  30. Hill K, Schwarz J, Flicker L et al. Fall among healthy community dwelling older women: a comprehensive audit. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 1997;43:173-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60408-6
  31. Hsieh CL, Sheu CF, Hsueh IP et al. Trunk Control as an Early Predictor of Comprehensive Activities of Daily Living Function in Stroke Patients. Stroke, 2002;33(10):2626-30. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000033930.05931.93
  32. Hwang S, Jeon HS, Yi CH et al. Locomotor imagery training improves gait performance in people with chronic hemiparetic stroke: a controlled clinical trial. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2010;24(6):514-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215509360640
  33. Kaesler DS, Mellifont RB, Kelly PS et al. A novel balance exercise programe for postural stability in older adults: A pilot study. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2007;11(1):37-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2006.05.003
  34. Krebs DE, Scarborough DM, McGibbon CA. Functional vs, strength training in disabled elderly outpatients. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2007;86(2):93-103 https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31802ede64
  35. Lay AN, Hass CJ, Nichols TR et al.. The effects of sloped surfaces on locomotion ;an electromyographic analysis. Journal of biomechanics. 2007; 40:1276-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.05.023
  36. MacKay-Lyons MJ, Makrides L. Longitudinal changes in exercise capacity after stroke. Original Research Article. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2004;85(10):1608-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2004.01.027
  37. Mathias S, Nayak U, Isaacs B. Balance in elderly patients: The "Get up and Go test". Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986;67:387-9.
  38. Neumann DA. Kinesiology of the musculoskeletal system: Foundation for physical rehabilitation. St Luis Missori, Mosby, 2009.
  39. Noles SW, Cash TF, Winstead BA. Body image, physical attractiveness and depression. Journal of Counceling Clinical Phychology. 1985;53(1):220-62.
  40. Nyberg L, Gustafson Y. Patient falls in stroke rehabilitation: a challenge to rehabilitation strategies. Stroke 1995;26:838-42. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.26.5.838
  41. Olney SJ, Richards C. Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part i: Characteristics. Gait Posture 1996; 4:136-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0966-6362(96)01063-6
  42. O'Sullivan SB, Schmitz TJ. Physical rehabilitation: Assessment and treatment, 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA, F.A. Davis Co. 2001
  43. Ryerson S, Levit K.. Functional movement reeducation, 1st ed New York, Churchill Livingstone. 1997.
  44. Said CM, Goldie PA, Patla AE et al. Effect of stroke on the step characteristics of obstacle crossing. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:1712-9. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.26247
  45. Schmid A, Duncan PW, Studenski S et al. Improvements in speed-based gait classifications are meaningful. Stroke.2007;38(7(July)):2096-100. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.475921
  46. Sutbeyaz S, Yavuzer G, Sezer N et al. Mirror therapy enhances lower-extremity motor recovery and motor functioning after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2007;88(5):555-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.02.034
  47. Verghese J, Wang C, Xue X, Holtzer R. Self-reported difficulty in climbing up or down stairs in nondisabled elderly. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:100-4.
  48. Weerdesteyn V, Nienhuis B, Geurts AC et al. Agerelated deficits in early response characteristics of obstacle avoidance under time pressure. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Science, 2007;62:1042-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/62.9.1042
  49. Wevers L, van de Port I, Vermue M, et al. Effects of task-oriented circuit class training on walking competency after stroke: a systematic review. Stroke. 2009:40(7); 2450-9. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.541946
  50. Winstein CJ. Designing practice for motor lerning: clinical implications. Contemporary management of motor problems. Proceedings of the II step Conference. Alexadria, VA: APTA. 1991.
  51. Yang YR, Tsai MP, Chuang TY et al. Virtual reality-based training improves community ambulation in individuals with stroke: A randomized controlled trials. Gait Posture. 2008;28(2):201-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.11.007
  52. Yavuzer G, Eser F, Karakus D et al. The effects of balance training on gait late after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2006; 20:960-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215506070315

피인용 문헌

  1. 그룹 재활운동 및 체육 프로그램이 지역사회 뇌졸중 장애인의 보행기능, 균형지수 및 무릎관절 근력에 미치는 영향 vol.6, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.15268/ksim.2018.6.4.015
  2. 장애물 넘기 트레드밀 보행 훈련이 편마비 환자의 정적 및 동적 균형 능력에 미치는 영향 vol.14, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2019.14.1.139