IE interfaces (산업공학)

Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers (대한산업공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Integrity Checking Rules for Independent Changes of Collaboration Processes

협업 프로세스의 독립적 변경 보장 규칙 개발

  • Kim, Ae-Kyung (Department of Industrial and Management Systems Engineering, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Jung, Jae-Yoon (Department of Industrial and Management Systems Engineering, Kyung Hee University)
  • 김애경 (경희대학교 산업경영공학과) ;
  • 정재윤 (경희대학교 산업경영공학과)
  • Received : 2011.12.09
  • Accepted : 2012.02.06
  • Published : 2012.03.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Traditional business process management systems provide verification tools of process models to deploy and automate the models. However, there are not so many studies on how to maintain systematically collaborative process models such as supply chain processes when companies are willing to change and update the collaborative process models. In this paper, we analyze change patterns of collaborative processes and declare 19 change patterns. In addition, we apply the change patterns to the process interoperability patterns in order to identify the change problems in case of independent process changes of collaborative processes. As a result, we devise an independency checking algorithm of process changes in collaborative processes.

Keywords

References

  1. Dumas, M., van der Aalst, W. M. P., ter Hofstede, A. H. (2005), Process-Aware Information Systems : Bridging People and Software Through Process Technology, Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ.
  2. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., and Vlissides, J. (1995), Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
  3. Jung, J.-Y., Hur, W., Kang, S.-H., and Kim, H. (2004), Business Process Choreography for B2B Collaboration, IEEE Internet Computing, 8(1), 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2004.1260702
  4. Kim, D., Lee, N., Kang, S., Cho, M., and Kim, M. (2010), Business Process Version Management Based on Process Change Patterns, International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, 6(2), 567-575.
  5. Liu, C.-L. (2010), CDADE : Conflict detector in activity diagram evolution based on speech act and ontology, Knowledge-Based Systems, 23(6), 536-546.
  6. van der Aalst, W. M. P. (1999), Formalization and Verification of Event-driven Process Chains, Information and Software Technology, 41(10), 639-650. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-5849(99)00016-6
  7. van der Aalst, W. M. P., ter Hofstede, A. H. M., Kiepuszewski, B., and Barros, A. P. (2003), Workflow Patterns, Distributed and Parallel Databases, 14(3), 5-51. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022883727209
  8. Weber, B., Reichert, M., and Rinderle-Ma, S. (2008), Change patterns and change support features-Enhancing flexibility in process-aware information systems, Data and Knowledge Engineering, 66(3), 438-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2008.05.001
  9. WfMC (2001), Workflow Standard-Interoperability Wf-XML Binding, Workflow Management Coalition, WFMC-TC-1023, Lighthouse Point, FL.
  10. WPI (1999), Workflow Patterns Home Page. http://www.workflowpatterns.com/.