수산동물 지정검역물에 대한 표본검사 계획 검토

Evaluation of Sample Testing Scheme for Designated Aquatic Animals

  • 박선일 (강원대학교 수의과대학 및 동물의학종합연구소)
  • Pak, Son-Il (College of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Veterinary Science, Kangwon National University)
  • 심사 : 2011.08.27
  • 발행 : 2012.02.29

초록

To protect aquatic animal health of importing countries from the potential risks associated with exotic diseases introduced through international trade of live aquatic animals, inspection of designated commodities at ports of entry is a critical component of the safeguarding system. The only way to be 100% confident that no fishes in a shipment are infected with a specific agent is to test every fish in the commodity imported with a perfect diagnostic test. For the majority of cases, this is unrealistic since the group of interest may very large particularly for aquatic animals, or imperfect tests are often available. It is, therefore, more common to test a fixed proportion of a group by preplanned sampling schemes. However, decision making based on results of testing the sample can provide quite a chance that infected groups may be misclassified as uninfected, depending on sampling strategy employed. The objective of this study was to determine the possibility that one or more fishes in the group imported being infected but tests negative after inspecting samples. This question is critical to government authorities to examine whether sampling plan is sufficient to achieve the purpose intended for. At fixed population size, the maximum number of infected fishes when all tests negative was decreased as the sampling fraction increased. The probability of including at least one undetected but infected fish in a group for negative tests increased with the number of fish tested or true prevalence. The risk was much lesser where high sensitivity test was assumed; when increasing test sensitivity from 0.9 to 0.99, this risk was dramatically reduced to about a tenth or a fourth for prevalence ranges from 2 to 10%, given sample size ranges from 10 to 200. Based on the preliminary analysis, the author concluded that current sampling plan testing 4-8% of the import proposal for human consumption still can yield high false negative results. Therefore, from the quarantine inspection point of view, an enforced commodity-specific sampling design that accounts for the cost of testing with an imperfect test at the specified design prevalence is urgent.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 국립수산물품질검사원. 2009년도 수산물검사검역연보 (제 69호), 2010.
  2. 농림수산식품부. 수산동물질병 관리법 시행규칙. 농림수산 식품부령 제 125호, 2010.
  3. Cannon RM, Roe RT. Livestock disease surveys: A field manual for veterinarians. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1982: 1-35.
  4. East IJ. Addressing the problems of using the polymerase chain reaction technique as a stand-alone test for detecting pathogens in aquatic animals. Rev Sci Tech 2008; 27: 829-837.
  5. Marchevsky N, Held JR, García-Carrillo C. Probability of introducing diseases because of false negative test results. Am J Epidemiol 1989; 130: 611-614.
  6. Martin PAJ, Cameron AR, Greiner M. Demonstrating freedom from disease using multiple complex data sources: a new methodology based on scenario trees. Prev Vet Med 2007; 79: 71-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2006.09.008
  7. Mohan CV, Phillips MJ, Bhat BV, Umesh NR, Padiyar PA. Farm-level plans and husbandry measures for aquatic animal disease emergencies. Rev Sci Tech 2008; 27: 161-173.
  8. OIE (World Organization for Animal Health). Manual of diagnostic tests for aquatic animals. 4th ed. OIE, Paris. 2003: 76-81.
  9. OIE (World Organization for Animal Health). Handbook on import risk analysis for animals and animal products. Volume 2: Quantitative risk assessment, OIE, Paris. 2004: 53-63.
  10. OIE (World Organization for Animal Health). Chapter 1.4. Aquatic animal health surveillance. In: Aquatic Animal Health Code. OIE, Paris. 2010.
  11. Quade D, Lachenbruch PA, Whaley FS, McClish DK, Haley RW. Effects of misclassification on statistical inferences in epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol 1980; 111: 503-515.
  12. Serrano E, Cross PC, Beneria M, Ficapal A, Curia J, Marco X, Lavín S, Marco I. Decreasing prevalence of brucellosis in red deer through efforts to control disease in livestock. Epidemiol Infect 2011; 31: 1-5.
  13. USDA. Agriculture Quarantine Inspection Monitoring (AQIM) handbook. Washington, DC: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, 1998.
  14. Vose D. Risk analysis: A quantitative guide. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK, 2000: 349-371.
  15. Wells SJ, Ebel ED, Williams MS, Scott AE, Wagner BA, Marshall KL. Use of epidemiologic information in targeted surveillance for population inference. Prev Vet Med 2009; 89: 43-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.01.007