DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Dynamic Characteristics of Slipmeters with Force Platform

하중판을 이용한 미끄러짐 측정기의 동력학적 특성 평가

  • Kim, Jung-Soo (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, KOSHA)
  • 김정수 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원)
  • Received : 2012.03.19
  • Accepted : 2012.08.23
  • Published : 2012.10.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study were to evaluate the dynamic characteristics of the portable slipmeters with respect to actual slipping and to compare their output with those of force platform. The selected slipmeters were commonly used devices for slipperiness measurement in situ floors. Their output quantity represented force (BOT-3000), loss of energy(British pendulum striker) and angle of inclination(English XL). The validity of these devices was studied with respect to actual slipping using a force platform. The precision of these devices was also evaluated with force platform. Based on dynamics of human subject behavior when slipping during normal walking, the all devices tested in this study showed poor performances: low built up ratio, low normal pressure, and long contact time prior to slip. Nevertheless, their results reasonably correlated with those calculated from the ground reaction forces generated by the operation of the selected slipmeters on the force platform although the absolute values of COF from these three devices could be quite different. Also the results showed good repeatability under the some test conditions.

Keywords

References

  1. W. R. Chang et. al., "The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness, Part 1: Friction mechanisms and definition of test conditions", in W.R. Chang, T.K. Courtney, R. Gronqvist and M. Redfern (Eds) Measuring Slipperiness, Taylor & Francis, London and New York, 2002.
  2. R. Gronqvist, M. Hirvonen, and A. Tohv, "Evaluation of three portable floor slipperiness testers", Int. J. Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 25, pp. 85-95, 1999.
  3. R. Bowman, C.J. Strautins, P. Westgate, and G.W. Quick, "Implications for the development of slip resistance standards arising from rank comparisons of friction test results obtained using different walkway safety tribometers under various conditions" in Metrology of Pedestrian Locomotion and Slip Re sistance, STP 1242, M. Marpet and M.A. Sapienza(Eds), ASTM, West Coshohocken, PA, 2002.
  4. R. Gronqvist, M. Hirvonen, and A. Tuusa, "Slipperiness of the shoe-floor interface: comparison of objective and subjective assessments", Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 24, pp. 258-262, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(93)90460-Q
  5. W. R. Chang et. al., "The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness, Part 2: Survey of friction measurement devices", in W.R. Chang, T.K. Courtney, R. Gronqvist and M. Redfern(Eds) Measuring Slipperiness, Taylor & Francis, London and New York, 2002.
  6. L. Strandberg and H. Lanshammar, "Walking slipperiness compared to data from friction meters", in D. Winter, R. Norman, R. Wells, K. Hayes and A. Patla (Eds), Biomechanics IX B, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers, 1985.
  7. J. Sebald, "System oriented concept for testing and assessment of the slip resistance of safety, protective and occupational footwear", Pro Business GmbH, Berlin, 2009.
  8. J. S. Kim and J.S. Park, "Experimental study on slip characteristics of floor surface roughness and slider materials", J. of the KOSOS, Vol. 25, No. 6, 2010.
  9. 김정수, "3가지 미끄러짐 저항 측정기의 성능평가", 2011년 한국안전학회 추계학술대회, 2011.
  10. J. S. Kim, "Evaluation of slip resistance measuring device using human perception", Asia Pacific Symposium of Safety 2011, pp. 235-238, Jeju, Korea, 2011.
  11. UKSRG, United Kingdom Slip Resistance Group, "The Measurement of floor slip resistance guidelines recommended by UK Slip Resistance Group", Issue 3, June 2005.
  12. ANSI, "Standard for the Provision of Slip Resistance on Walking/Working Surfaces", ANSI/ASSE A1264. 2, 2006.
  13. K. Jung and H. Schenk, "An international comparison of test methods for determining the slip resistance of shoes", Journal of Occupational Accidents, Vol. 13, pp. 271-290, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6349(90)90034-S