References
- American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
- American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (1998). Blueprints for reform. New York: Oxford University Press.
- American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education [AACTE]. (2007). Preparing STEM Teachers: The Key to Global Competitiveness. Washington, DC: Author.
- Baek, Y., Park, H., Kim, Y., Noh, S., Park, JY, Lee, J., Jeong, J-S, Choi, Y., & Han, H. (2011). Steam education in Korea. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 11(4), 149-171. (in Korean).
- Baek, Y., Kim, Y., Noh, S., Park, H., Lee, J., Jeong, J-S, Choi, Y., Han, H., & Choi, J. (2012). Basic research for establishing the direction of STEAM education in Korea. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity.
- Barlex, D., & Pitt, J. (2000). Interaction: the relationship between science and design and technology in the secondary school curriculum. London: Engineering Council. p. 41
- Berger, E. H., & Pollman, M. J. (1996). Multiple Intelligences: Enabling Diverse Learning. Early Childhood Education Journal, 23(4), 249. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353348
- Bloom, B. S. (1974). An introduction to mastery learning theory. In J. H. Block (Ed.), Schools, society and mastery learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
- Choi, K. (2011). Lifelong learning Korea's strategy for standards education. http://www.iso.org/iso/bonus_korea_strategy_for_eduction Accessed: April 20, 2011.
- Chu, B. & Park, J. (1996). Moral education in Korea: Curriculum and teacher education. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Georgia Council for the Social Studies, Atlanta, GA.
- Dakers, J. R. (2006). Towards a philosophy for technology education. Defining Technological Literacy: Towards an epistemological framework. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- de Vries, M. J. (1996). Technology education: Beyond the technology is applied science. Journal of Technology Education, 8(1), 7-15.
- DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A History of Ideas in Science Education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
- Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
- Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Constructivism. In Psychology of learning for instruction. New York: Pearson.
- Driver, D., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 8.
- Ernest, P. (Ed.). (1994). Mathematics, Education and Philosophy: An international perspective. Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
- Featherstone, J. L. (1986). Forward. In B. Kimball (Ed.), Orators & philosophers: A history of the idea of liberal education. New York: Teacher College Press.
- Firlik, R. (1996). Can We Adapt the Philosophies and Practices of Reggio Emilia, Italy, for Use in American Schools? Early Childhood Education Journal, 23(4), 217. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353340
- Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group Inc.
- Froebel. (1947). Froebel. In R. Ulich (Ed.), Three thousand years of educational wisdom: Selections from great documents. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Furth, H. G. (1970). Piaget for teachers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
- Gardner, P. L. (1997). The Roots of Technology and Science: A Philosophical and Historical View. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(1-2).
- Hersh, R. (1994). Fresh Breezes in the Philosophy of Mathematics. In P. Ernest (Ed.), Mathematics, education and philosophy: An international perspective Washington, D.C.: Falmer Press.
- Huber, M. T., & Hutchings, P. (2005). The advancement of learning: Building the teaching commons. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Huber, M. T., & Morreale, S. P. (2002). Disciplinary styles in the scholarship of teaching and learning: Exploring common ground. Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education and The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
- Hwang , C. (March 27, 2011). "한국 청소년 '공동체 의식 희박" Yonhap News. http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/bulletin/2011/03/26/0200000000AKR20110326064600004.HTML. Retrieved April 17th, 2011. (in Korean).
- International Technology Education Association [ITEA]. (2000). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston VA: Author.
- KBS. (2011a). KBS World - Language. http://rki.kbs.co.kr/english/korea/aboutkorea/korea_aboutlanguage.htm. Accessed: April 20, 2011
- KBS. (2011b). KBS World Symbol. http://rki.kbs.co.kr/english/korea/aboutkorea/ korea_aboutsymbol.htm. Accessed: April 20, 2011
- Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity[KOFAC]. (2011). STEAM Education. Seoul: KOFAC.
- Kwon, H., Park, K. & Lee, H. (2009). Research Trends on the Integrative Efforts in Technology Education: Reviews of the Relevant Journals. Secondary Education Research, 57(1), 245-274.
- Laporte, J., & Sanders, M. (1993). The T/S/M integration project. The Technology Teacher, 52(6), 5.
- Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Lauda, D. P. (1980). Technology Education: A Concept in Transition. Paper presented at the Technology Education Symposium 80.
- Lee, H., & Park. K. (2010). Elementary School Students' Images of Scientists and Engineers, Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 16(4), 61-82. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.17055/jpaer.2010.16.4.61
- Marzano, R. (2007). The Art and Science of Teaching: A Comprehensive Framework for Effective Instruction. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Merriam, S. B. (1998). Case study research in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
- Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
- Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [MEST]. (2010). The 2nd National Master Plan for Science and Technology Education. Seoul: MEST.
- Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [MEST]. (2011). The 2009 revised science curriculum. Seoul: MEST.
- Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [MEST]. (2012). 2012 national plan for STEAM education . Seoul: MEST.
- Minnis, M., & John-Steiner, V. (2005). The Challenge of Integration in Interdisciplinary Education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2005(102), 45.
- Mishook, J. J., & Kornhaber, M. L. (2006). Arts Integration in an Era of Accountability. Arts Education Policy Review, 107(4), 3.
- Montessori, M. (1975). Dr. Montessori's Own Handbook (14th, 1st Schocken Edition ed.). New York: Schoecken.
- National Academy of Engineering [NAE]. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- National Academy of Engineering [NAE]. (2005). Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- National Association for Sport and Physical Education [NASPE]. (2004). Moving into the Future: National Standards for Physical Education (2nd ed.). Reston, VA: Author.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
- National Research Council [NRC]. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- National Research Council [NRC]. (2012). A Framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
- OECD. (2007). PISA 2006 Science Competencies for tomorrow's world. Volume 1: Analysis. Paris: OECD.
- OECD (2010). Education at a glance: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD.
- Onishi, N. (April 2, 2006). In a Wired South Korea, Robots Will Feel Right at Home http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/02/world/asia/02robot.html Accessed: April 20, 2011
- Paulos, J. A. (1995). A mathematician reads the newspaper. New York: Basic Books Harper Collins.
- Petrina, S. (1998). Multidisciplinary technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8(2), 36.
- Pinch, T., & Bijker, W. E. (1994). Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other.
- Rogers, C. (1969). Freedom to Learn: A View of What Education Might Become (1st ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles Merill.
- Ruggiero, V. R. (1988). Teaching thinking across the curriculum. New York: Harper & Row.
- Rutherford, F.J. & Ahlgren, A. (1989). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Salinger, G. L. (2005). The engineering of technology education. The Journal of Technology Studies.
- Sanders, M. (2006). A rationale for new approaches to STEM education and STEM education graduate programs Paper presented at the 93rd Mississippi Valley Technology Teacher Education Conference. Section IV: Issues in STEM Education.
- Sanders, M., Kwon, H., Park, K. & Lee, H. (2011). Integrative STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education: Contemporary trends and issues. Secondary Education Research, 59(3), 729-762.
- Wicklein, R. C. S., John W. . (1995). Case Studies of Multidisciplinary Approaches to Integrating Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. Journal of Technology Education, 6(2).
- Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
-
Yakman, G, (2008).
$ST{\Sigma}@M$ Education: an overview of creating a model of integrative education. Pupils Attitudes Towards Technology 2008 Annual Proceedings. Netherlands. - Zuga, K. (1993). A role for alternative curriculum theories in technology education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 30(4), 19.
Cited by
- A Study on Elementary Students' Perceptions of Science, Engineering, and Technology and on the Images of Scientists, Engineers, and Technicians vol.34, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.8.0719
- Hands-On Math and Art Exhibition Promoting Science Attitudes and Educational Plans vol.2017, pp.2090-4010, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9132791
- A Theoretical Framework for Developing an Intercultural STEAM Program for Australian and Korean Students to Enhance Science Teaching and Learning pp.1573-1774, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9922-y
- Developing critical and creative thinking skills through STEAM integration in chemistry learning vol.1156, pp.1742-6596, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1156/1/012033
- 교과대체형 STEAM(융합인재교육) 프로그램 개발 및 적용 후 학생들의 인식 분석 - 6학년 에너지 관련 단원을 중심으로 - vol.7, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.15523/jksese.2014.7.1.119
- 중등 과학 영재학생들의 시스템 사고력 향상을 위한 융합인재교육 프로그램의 개발 및 적용 vol.24, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.9722/jgte.2014.24.3.421
- Analysing science and arts unified activity patternsin the ‘three to five-year-old Nuri Course teacher’s manual’based on STEAM vol.34, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.18023/kjece.2014.34.4.005
- A Case Study on “Take One Picture” at the National Gallery in London: Its Implications on STEAM education and Teacher Training Program in Korea vol.40, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.35657/jae.2015.40.0.006
- STEAM 교육을 위한 로봇 콘텐츠 개발 vol.20, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.9723/jksiis.2015.20.1.009
- From Interdisciplinary to Transdisciplinary: An Arts-Integrated Approach to STEAM Education vol.69, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1224873
- 과학기술과 인문학 융합 내용 및 융합 방법 실태 분석 -초등학교 융합인재교육(STEAM) 프로그램 개발 과제를 중심으로- vol.37, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.2.0313
- 시스템 사고에 기반한 STEAM 교육 프로그램이 기후변화 학습에 미치는 효과 vol.17, pp.7, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2017.17.07.113
- 초등학교 비형식 과학 교육을 위한 융합인재교육(STEAM) 프로그램의 개발 및 적용 - '빛' 주제를 중심으로 vol.10, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.15523/jksese.2017.10.2.122
- Teaching the concept of time: A steam-based program on computational thinking in science education vol.5, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2018.1507306
- Implementation of Android-based Interactive Edutainment Contents Using Authoring Tool Developed for Interactive Animation vol.23, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2018.23.04.071
- 지구과학 문제 풀이에서 활용되는 통합 사고 유형 vol.42, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2018.42.3.322
- STEAM 프로그램이 예비 과학교사의 의사소통역량에 미치는 영향: STEAM 교육에 대한 경험과 성찰 vol.43, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2019.43.1.136
- Designing STEAM Education: Fostering Relationality through Design‐Led Disruption vol.39, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12258
- 중학생을 위한 시스템 사고 기반 STEAM 교육 프로그램의 개발 및 효과 분석 vol.41, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5467/jkess.2020.41.1.75
- A Theoretical Need for Applying Flipped Learning to STEAM Education vol.7, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.24313/jpbl.2020.00213
- The effect use of STEAM method on the classification ability in objects for children aged 4-5 years vol.1511, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1511/1/012119
- The Influence of PjBL-STEAM model toward students’ problem-solving skills on light and optical instruments topic vol.1567, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/4/042054
- The Impact of Questioning Techniques on STEAM Instruction vol.42, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2019.1638848
- Curriculum analysis and design, implementation, and validation of a STEAM project through educational robotics in primary education vol.29, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22373
- Space for STEAM: New Creativity Challenge in Education vol.12, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.586318
- STEAM Education for Enhancing Creativity in Packaging Design vol.34, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2021.02.34.1.21
- The trouble with STEAM and why we use it anyway vol.105, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21605
- EXPLORIA, a New Way to Teach Maths at University Level as Part of Everything vol.9, pp.10, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3390/math9101082
- STEM vs. STEAM Education and Student Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review vol.11, pp.7, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070331
- Implementation of a Playful Microproject Based on Traditional Games for Working on Mathematical and Scientific Content vol.11, pp.10, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100624
- Implementation of a STEAM project in compulsory secondary education that creates connections with the environment (Implementación de un proyecto STEAM en Educación Secundaria generando c vol.44, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2021.1925475
- STEAM education: contributing evidence of validity and effectiveness (Educación STEAM: aportando pruebas de validez y efectividad) vol.44, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2021.1926678