DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Use of Two Estrus Synchronization Protocols and Their Success on Pregnancy in Zebu and Crossbred Heifers at Char Areas of Bangladesh

  • Ghosh, Tapas (Department of Surgery and Obstetrics, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University) ;
  • Paul, Ashit Kumar (Department of Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicne, Patuakhali Science and Technology University) ;
  • Talukder, Anup Kumar (Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University) ;
  • Alam, M. Golam Shahi (Department of Surgery and Obstetrics, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University) ;
  • Bari, Farida Yeasmin (Department of Surgery and Obstetrics, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University)
  • Received : 2012.10.13
  • Accepted : 2012.12.15
  • Published : 2012.12.31

Abstract

This study was designed to adopt two estrus synchronization protocols in zebu and crossbred heifers and their effects on pregnancy rate after timed artificial insemination (TAI). A number of 120 cyclic heifers were allotted for two different treatment groups and one control group. Heifers under protocol A were injected with GnRH at first day followed by a single dose of $PGF_{2{\alpha}}$ at Day 11 and injection of GnRH at the day of AI; and heifers belonged to protocol B were treated with GnRH, two $PGF_{2{\alpha}}$ injections at 11 days apart and injection of GnRH at AI. AI was done at fixed time (within 72~96 hours after $PGF_{2{\alpha}}$ injection) in both protocols and pregnancy was confirmed by rectal palpation on 80~120 days of post AI. In control group; local heifers were conceived higher (30%) proportion than that of crossbred heifers (25%; p<0.05). In protocol A, the local breed were conceived higher (38.9%) proportion compared with crossbred (25%; p<0.05). In protocol B, local breed heifers were conceived higher (38.9%) proportion compared with crossbred heifers (33.3%; p<0.05). The overall pregnancy rate in protocol A and protocol B was 33.3% and 36.6%, respectively. The proportion of pregnancy rate of local heifers (38.9%; Protocol A) was significant (p<0.05) in comparison with local heifers (30%) in control group (p<0.05). The overall pregnancy rate between pooled control group (28.3%) and treatment group (35%) was significantly (p<0.05) differ from each other's. Results of present study concluded that estrus synchronization followed by fixed time AI could be applied for higher pregnancy rate in zebu and crossbred heifers.

Keywords

References

  1. Alam MGS and Dobson H. 1987. Pituitary responses to a challenge test of GnRH and oestradiol benzoate in postpartum and regularly cyclic cows. Animal Reproduction Science 14:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(87)90071-6
  2. Alam MGS and Ghosh A. 1993. Reproductive patterns of indigenous cows in Bangladesh and effect of Urea-Molasses- Mineral block (UMMB) on puberty and postpartum ovarian activity. Proc. Final Research Co-ordination Meeting of an FAO/IAEA Co-ordinated Research Programme Organized by Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Technique in Food and Agriculture Bankok, Thailand, 1-5 February :53-63.
  3. Alam MGS, Yeasmin F, Ahmed JU and Rahman M. 1993. Oestrus synchronization in zebu cows with $Estrumate^{(R)}$. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science 22:87-92.
  4. Bhuyian MR. 1990. Synchronization of oestrus in Zebu cattle with $Estrumate^{(R)}$. MS Thesis, Department of Surgery and Obstetrics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
  5. Burke JM, Sota RL, Risco CA, Staples CR and Schmitt EJP. 1996. Evaluation of timed insemination using gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 79:1385-1393. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(96)76496-2
  6. Butler SAA, Phillips NJ, Boe-Hansen GB, Bo GA, Burns BM, Dawson K and McGowan MR. 2011. Ovarian responses in Bos indicus heifers treated to synchronise ovulation with intravaginal progesterone releasing devices, oestradiol benzoate, prostaglandin $F_{2\alpha}$ and equine chorionic gonadotrophin. Animal Repoduction Science 129:118-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2011.11.001
  7. Chenault JR, Kratzer DD, Rzepkowski RA and Goodwin MC. 1990. LH and FSH response of Holstein heifers to fertirelin acetate, gonadoreline and buserelin. Theriogenology 34:81-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(90)90579-I
  8. Chowdury MK, Shamsuddin M, Bhuyan MMU and Alam MGS. 1998. Bovine luteal response to prostaglandin preparation available in local market. The Bangladesh Veterinarian 15: 7-12.
  9. Donaldson LE. 1980. The development and marketing of oestrus synchrinization im cattle in Australia using prostaglandin. Theriogenology 14:391-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(80)90050-3
  10. Esslemont RJ and Mawhinney I. 1996. The cost benefits of a planned breeding routine for dairy cows. Cattle Practice 4: 293-300.
  11. Hardin DR, Warnick AC, Wise TH, Schulutz RH and Fields MJ. 1980. Artificial insemination of subtropical commercial beef cattle following synchronization with closprostenol ICI (80996). I. Fertility. Theriogenology 14:249-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(80)90075-8
  12. Lauderdale JW, Mcallislen JF, Kra DP and Moody EL. 1981. Use of prostalandin $F_{2\alpha}$ in cattle breeding. Acta Veterinary Scand. 77:181-191.
  13. Martinez MF, Bergfelt DR, Adams GP, Kastelic JP and Mapletoft RJ. 1997. Synchronization of follicular wave emergence and its use in an oestrus synchronization programme. Theriogenology. 47:145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(97)82272-8
  14. Ott RS and Gustafasson BK. 1981. Therapeutic application of Prostaglandin for potpartum infection. Acta Veterinary Scand. 71:363-369.
  15. Paul AK, Alam MGS and Shamsuddin M. 2011. Factors that limit first service pregnancy rate in cows at char management of Bangladesh. Livestock Research for Rural Development 23: Article #57.
  16. Peters AR, Mawhinney I and Drew SB. 1999. Development of a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone and prostaglandin regimen for the planned breeding of dairy cows. Veterinary Research 145:516-521.
  17. Pursley JR, Kosorok MW and Wiltbank MC. 1997. Reproductive management of lactating dairy cows using synchronization of ovulation. Journal of Dairy Science 80:301-306. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)75938-1
  18. Schmitt EJP, Diaz TC and Barros CM. 1996. Differential response of the luteal phase and fertility in cattle following ovulation of the first-wave follicle with human chorionic gonadotropin or an agonist of GnRH. Theriogenology 31: 149-164.
  19. Seguin BE, Tate DJ and Otterby DE. 1983. Use of closprostenol in a reproductive management system for dairy cattle. Journal of AmericanVeterinary Medicine Association 183:537.
  20. Shamsuddin M, Bhuyan MMU, Sikder TK, Sugulle AH, Chandra PK and Alam MGS. 2001. Constraints limiting the efficiency of artificial insemination of cattle in Bangladesh. International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA-TECDOC-1220, 9-27.
  21. Stevenson JS, Kobayashi Y, Shipka MP and Rauchholz KC. 1996. Altering conception of dairy cattle by gonadotropinreleasing hormone preceding luteolysis induced by prostaglandin $F_{2\alpha}$. Journal of Dairy Science 79:402-410. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(96)76379-8
  22. Stevenson JS, Phatak AP, Rettmer I and Stewart RE. 1993. Post insemination administration of receptal; follicular dynamics, duration of cycle, hormonal responses and pregnancy rates. Journal Dairy Science 76:2536-2547. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77589-X
  23. Thatcher WW and Chenault JR. 1976. Reproductive physiolocal responses of cattle to exogenous prostaglandin $F_{2\alpha}$ alpha. Journal of Dairy Science 59:1366-1375. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(76)84369-X
  24. Thatcher WW, Drost M, Savio JD, Macmillan KL, Entwistle KW, Schmitt EJ, Sota RL, De La and Morris GR. 1993. New clinical uses of GnRH and its analogues in cattle. Theriogenology 31:149-164.
  25. Twangiramungu H, Guilbault LA, Proulx J and Dufour JJ. 1992. Synchronization of oestrus and fertility in beef cattle with two injections of buserelin and prostaglandin. Theriogenology 38:1131-1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(92)90126-C
  26. Voss HJ, Allen SE, Foote RH, Im P, Kim CK and Aquadro P. 1989. Buserelin in a superovulatory regimen for Holstein cows. Pituitary and ovarian hormone response in an experimental herd. Theriogenology 31:371-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(89)90543-8
  27. Zeroual A. 1994. Approche bitechnologique pour ameliorer in synchronization de loestrus chez le bovin de boucherie et intensifier lutinization de insemination artificielle. MS thesis. Universite Laval. Quebec, Canada.