Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지

Reconstruction of Mandibular Bone Defect Using a Titanium Mesh with Autogenous Particulate Cortical Bone Graft by an Intraoral Approach: A Case Report

구강내 접근으로 자가 분쇄 피질골과 Titanium Mesh를 이용한 광범위한 하악골 골결손부 재건: 증례보고

  • Choi, Seok-Tai (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Chonbuk National University, Brain Korea 21 Project) ;
  • Leem, Dae-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Chonbuk National University, Brain Korea 21 Project)
  • 최석태 (전북대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실, 구강생체과학연구소, BK21사업) ;
  • 임대호 (전북대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실, 구강생체과학연구소, BK21사업)
  • Received : 2012.08.16
  • Accepted : 2012.11.23
  • Published : 2012.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The loss of mandibular continuity due to trauma, neoplasm, or infection results in major esthetic and biologic compromise. The reconstruction of the mandibular bone defect still poses a challenge to oral and maxillofacial surgeons. There have been a number of variety graft materials. Among them, free block bone graft with rigid fixation has been widely used. However, cases using free block bone grafts may lead to a marked invasion of the donor site, mal-union, and absorption of the block bone. In this respect, particulate cortical bone using a titanium mesh tray can be an effective alternative option in order to achieve a proper bone contour and good oral rehabilitation. We have developed an intraoral approach for the mandibular reconstruction method using a titanium mesh tray with autogenous particulate cortical bone graft.

Keywords

References

  1. Boyne PJ, Zarem H. Osseous reconstruction of the resected mandible. Am J Surg 1976;132:49-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(76)90289-0
  2. Block MS, Kent JN, editors. Endosseous implants for maxillofacial reconstruction. Philadelphia: W.B Saunders Co.; 1995.
  3. Curtis TA, Ware WH, Beirne OR, Frankel ME. Autogenous bone grafts for atrophic edentulous mandibles: a final report. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:73-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90119-3
  4. Schwartz-Arad D, Levin L. Multitier technique for bone augmentation using intraoral autogenous bone blocks. Implant Dent 2007;16:5-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3180327595
  5. Korean association of maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgeons, editor. Textbook of maxillofacial plastic surgery & reconstructive surgery. 2nd ed. clinical application of maxillofacial reconstruction. Seoul: Dental & medical publishing Co.; 2009.
  6. Mooren RE, Merkx MA, Kessler PA, Jansen JA, Stoelinga PJ. Reconstruction of the mandible using preshaped 2.3-mm titanium plates, autogenous cortical bone plates, particulate cancellous bone, and platelet-rich plasma: a retrospective analysis of 20 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:2459-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.12.006
  7. Kim YB, Cho SD, Leem DH. Suture technique for successful guided bone regeneration; preliminary report of double layered suture technique with subgingival suture. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;31:86-91.
  8. Kruger GV, editor. Textbook of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 6th ed. Toronto: Mosby; 1984.
  9. Fonseca R, Ddnvis WH, editors. Reconstructive preprosthetic oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W.B Saunders Co.; 1995.
  10. Harakas NK. Demineralized bone-matrix-induced osteogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984;188:239-51.
  11. Nystrom E, Ahlqvist J, Kahnberg KE, Rosenquist JB. Autogenous onlay bone grafts fixed with screw implants for the treatment of severely resorbed maxillae. Radiographic evaluation of preoperative bone dimensions, postoperative bone loss, and changes in soft-tissue profile. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;25:351-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(06)80029-9
  12. Misch CM. Use of the mandibular ramus as a donor site for onlay bone grafting. J Oral Implantol 2000;26:42-9. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2000)026<0042:UOTMRA>2.3.CO;2
  13. Jensen J, Sindet-Pedersen S, Oliver AJ. Varying treatment strategies for reconstruction of maxillary atrophy with implants: results in 98 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;52: 210-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(94)90283-6
  14. Miller NA, Penaud J, Kohler C, Ambrosini P. Regeneration of bone graft donor sites. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:326-30. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100409.x
  15. Avery JK. Development of cartilages and bonesof the facial skeleton. In: Avery JK, editor. Oral development and histology. New York: Thieme medical publishers; 1994.
  16. Precious DS, Smith WP. The use of mandibular symphyseal bone in maxillofacial surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;30:148-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(92)90145-9
  17. Lu M, Rabie AB. Quantitative assessment of early healing of intramembranous and endochondral autogenous bone grafts using micro-computed tomography and Q-win image analyzer. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;33:369-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2003.09.009
  18. Schwartz-Arad D, Levin L. Intraoral autogenous block onlay bone grafting for extensive reconstruction of atrophic maxillary alveolar ridges. J Periodontol 2005;76:636-41. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.4.636
  19. Takikawa S, Bauer TW, Kambic H, Togawa D. Comparative evaluation of the osteoinductivity of two formulations of human demineralized bone matrix. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;65:37-42.
  20. Schenk RK. Bone regeneration: biologic basis. In: Buser D, Dahlin C, Schenk RK, editors. Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 1994.
  21. Boyne PJ. Restoration of osseous defects in maxillofacial casualities. J Am Dent Assoc 1969;78:767-76.
  22. Kim YK, Kim HT, Cho CU. Reconstruction of intraoral jaw defects with corticocancellous block of mandibular symphysis. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;26:666-71.
  23. Schlegel KA, Fichtner G, Schultze-Mosgau S, Wiltfang J. Histologic findings in sinus augmentation with autogenous bone chips versus a bovine bone substitute. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:53-8.