DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Cementing Efficiency of Fly-ash in Mortar Matrix According to Binder-Water Ratio and Fly-ash Replacement Ratio

  • Cho, Hong-Bum (Department of Architectural Engineering, Graduate School, Hanyang University) ;
  • Jee, Nam-Yong (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University)
  • Received : 2011.10.14
  • Accepted : 2012.02.17
  • Published : 2012.04.20

Abstract

This paper predicts the cementing efficiency of fly-ash(FA) based on mortar test considering binder-water ratio and FA replacement ratio as experimental variables. The cementing efficiency prediction model proposed by statistical analysis enables us to estimate the value according to the binder-water ratio and FA replacement ratio of matrix. When FA replacement ratio is the same, the lower the binder-water ratio, the higher the estimated cementing efficiency. There are significant differences in the values according to binder-water ratio at FA replacement ratios of 15% or less, but there are almost no differences when FA replacement ratio is more than 15%. As the binder-water ratio increases, the variations in the values according to FA replacement ratio are great at FA replacement ratios of 15% or less. As the FA replacement ratios increase, the values increase for FA replacement ratios of 15% or less, but decrease for more than 15%. The values range from -0.71 to 1.24 at binder-water ratio of 1.67-2.86 and FA replacement ratio of 0-70%. The RMSE of the 28-day compressive strength predicted by modified water-cement ratio is 2.2 MPa. The values can be trusted, as there is good agreement between predicted strength and experimental strength.

Keywords

References

  1. Bharatkumar BH, Narayanan R, Raghuprasad BK. Ramachandramurthy DS. Mix proportioning of high performance concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2001 Feb;23(1):71-80.
  2. Oner A, Akyuz S, Yildiz R. An experimental study on strength development of concrete containing fly ash and optimum usage of fly ash in concrete. Cement and Concrete Research. 2005 Jun;35(6):1165-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.09.031
  3. Rajamane NP, Peter JA, Ambily PS. Prediction of compressive strength of concrete with fly ash as sand replacement material. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2007 Mar;29(3):218-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.10.001
  4. Hwang K, Noguchi T, Tomosawa F. Prediction model of compressive strength development of fly-ash concrete. Cement and Concrete Research. 2004 Dec;34(12):2269-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.04.009
  5. Hedegaard SE, Hansen TC. Modified Water Cement Ratio Law for Compressive Strength of Fly-Ash Concretes. Materials and Structures. 1992 Jun;25(5):273-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02472668
  6. Smith IA. The design of fly ash concretes. ICE Proceedings. 1967 Apr;36(4):769-90. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1967.8472
  7. Neville AM. Neville on Concrete - An Examination of Issues in Concrete Practice. 2nd ed. London: BOOKSURGE LLC; 2006. Chapter2.5, How Useful is the Water-cement Ratio; p. 2-50.
  8. Papadakis VG, Antiohos S, Tsimas S. Supplementary cementing materials in concrete-Part II: A fundamental estimation of the efficiency factor. Cement and Concrete Research. 2002 Oct;32(10):1533-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00829-3
  9. Wong HS, Razak HA. Efficiency of calcined kaolin and silica fume as cement replacement material for strength performance. Cement and Concrete Research. 2005 Apr;35(4):696-702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.05.051
  10. Babu KG, Rao GSN. Efficiency of fly ash in concrete with age. Cement and Concrete Research. 1996 Mar;26(3):465-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(96)85034-4
  11. Cho HB, Jee NY. Prediction Model for Cementing Efficiency of Fly Ash Concrete by Statistical Analyses. Advanced Materials Research. 2011 Mar;250-253:1293-96. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.250-253.1293
  12. Mehta PK. High-performance high-volume fly ash concrete for sustainable development. In: Kejin Wang, editor. Proceedings of the international workshop on sustainable development and concrete technology; 2004 May 20-21; Beijing (China). Iowa (IA): Iowa State University Publication; 2004. p. 3-14.
  13. Popovics S. Strength and related properties of concrete: a quantitative approach. 1st ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1998. Chapter 5.7, Discussion of Abrams' Formula for compressive strength; p. 335-43.
  14. Hanehara S, Tomosawa F, Kobayakawa M, Hwang KR. Effects of water/powder ratio, mixing ratio of fly ash, and curing temperature on pozzolanic reaction of fly ash in cement paste. Cement and Concrete Research. 2001 Jan;31(1):31-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00441-5
  15. Han SH, Kim JK, Park YD. Prediction of compressive strength of fly ash concrete by new apparent activation energy function. Cement and Concrete Research. 2003 Jul;33(7):965-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00007-3
  16. Mathews MS, Somayaji S, Ambedkar GSB. Effects of Fly Ash on Strength and Durability of Hydraulic Structures with Various Grades of Cement and Concrete. In: Malhotra VM. editor. Seventh CANMET /ACI International Conference on Fly ash, Silica Fume, Slag, and Natural Pozzolans in Concrete; 2001 July 22-27; Madras (India). Farmington Hills (MI): ACI; 2001. p. 127-46.