구강회복응용과학지 (Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science)

  • 제28권3호
  • /
  • Pages.233-243
  • /
  • 2012
  • /
  • 2384-4353(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-4272(eISSN)
대한턱관절교합학회 (Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion)
권호 표지

임플란트 보철물과 자연치 사이의 인접접촉강도의 경시적 변화

Time Serial Change of Proximal Contact Tightness Between the Implant Prothesis and Natural Tooth

  • 김진아 (조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 오상호 (조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김희중 (조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 민정범 (조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실)
  • Kim, Jin-A (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Oh, Sang-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Hee-Jung (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Min, Jeong-Bum (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 투고 : 2012.06.05
  • 심사 : 2012.09.25
  • 발행 : 2012.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구의 목적은 임플란트 보철물과 자연치 사이의 인접접촉강도의 경시적 변화를 평가하는 것이다. 단일 임플란트 보철물을 장착한 31명(상악제2대구치; 13명, 하악 제2대구치; 18명)의 피험자에게서 측정이 이루어졌다. 측정은 교합되지 않은 안정 상태에서 임플란트 보철 장착 직후, 1개월 그리고 6개월 후에 이루어졌다. 임플란트 보철물과 자연치 사이의 접촉강도는 상악(p<.01), 하악(p<.05) 모두 시간이 흐름에 따라 감소하였다.

The aim of this study was to evaluate time serial change of the TPTC(Tightness of Proximal Tooth Contact) between the implant prosthesis and natural tooth at rest state. Thirty-one patients(19 males and 12 females; mean age, 48.2 years) restored with a total 31 single-implant crowns in the left maxillary for 13 single-implant and left mandibular second molars for 18 single-implant crowns, respectively were selected. The TPTC was checked directly after delivery, 1 month after delivery and 6 months after delivery of prothesis at rest state. The TPTC decreased significantly as time goes by both maxilla(p<.01) and mandible(p<.05). The TPTC between the implant prosthesis and natural tooth decreased as time goes by after fixed implant prothesis placement.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Wheeler RC. An atlas of tooth form, 4th edn. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders Co; 1969:12.
  2. Sluder TB. Clinical dental anatomy, histology, physiology and occlusion. In: Studevant CM, ed. The art and science of operative dentistry, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1985:21.
  3. Hirschfeld I. Food impaction. J Am Dent Assoc 1930;17:1504-1528.
  4. The Academy of Prosthodontics. Glossary of prosthodontic terms, 8th edn. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:46.
  5. Gould MSE, Picton DCA. The relation between irregularities of the teeth and periodontal disease. Br Dent J 1966;121:20-23.
  6. Hancock EB, Mayo CV, Schwab RR, Wirthlin MR. Influence of interdental contacts on periodontal status. J Periodontol 1980;51:445-449.
  7. Nielson IM, Glavand L, Karring T. Interdental periodontal intrabony defects. J Clin Periodontol 1980;7:187-191.
  8. Jernberg GR, Bakdash MB, Keenan KM. Relationship between proximal tooth open contacts and periodontal disease. J Periodontol 1983;54:529-533.
  9. Plicher ES, Gellin RG. Open proximal contact associated with a cast restoration-progressive bone loss: a case report. Gen Dent 1998;46:294-297.
  10. Barnes DM, Blank LW, Thompson VP, Hoston AM, Gingell JC. A 5-and 8-year clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin. Quint Int 1991;22:143-151.
  11. Prakki A, Cilli R, Saad JOC, Rodrigues JR. Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restoration. Quint Int 2004;35:785-789.
  12. Lindquist JT. Thesis: A study of the intra-arch relationships in normal human dentitions, Indiana University School of Dentistry; 1951.
  13. Osborn JW. An investigation into the interdental forces occurring between the teeth of the same arch during clenching the jaws. Arch Oral Biol 1961;5: 202-211.
  14. Southard TE, Southard KA, Tolley EA. Variation of approximal tooth contact tightness with postural change. J Dent Res 1990;69:1776-1779.
  15. Dorfer CE, von Bethlenfalvy ER, Staehle HJ, Pioch T. Factors influencing proximal dental contact strength. Eur J Oral Sci 2000;108:368-377.
  16. Oh SH, Nakano M, Bando E, Shigemoto S, Kori M. Evaluation of proximal tooth contact tightness at rest and during clenching. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:538-545.
  17. Choi WJ. Evaluation and development of digital device for measuring proximal tooth contact tightness. Phd Thesis, IN, Korea: Chosun University School of Dentistry. 2007.
  18. Parfitt GJ. Measurement of the physiological mobility of individual teeth in an axial direction. J Dent Res 1960;39:608-618.
  19. Korber KH. Periodontal pulsation. Periodontol 1970;41:382-390.
  20. American Academy of Implant Dentistry. Glossary of terms, Oral Implant 1986;12:284.
  21. Trulsson M, Johansson RS. Encoding of tooth loads by human periodontal afferents and their role in jaw motor control. Prog Neurobiol 1996;49:267-284.
  22. Morikawa O. Influence of occlusal contacts of implant on adjacent teeth and antagonists displacements. Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi 2003;70:224-233.
  23. Göthberg C, Bergendal T, Magnusson T. Complications after treatment with implant-supported fixed prostheses: a retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16:201-207.
  24. Kim Y, Oh TJ, Misch CE, Wang HL. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:26-35.
  25. Wei H, Tomotake Y, Nagao K, Ichikawa T. Implant prostheses and adjacent tooth migration: preliminary retrospective survey using 3-dimensional occlusal analysis. Int J Prosthodont 2008;21:302-304.
  26. Kusakari H. Study on the contact point with special reference to interdental separation. J Japan Prosthodontic Soc. 1965;9:161-182.
  27. Picton DCA. Some implications of normal tooth mobility during mastication. Arch Oral Biol 1964; 9:565-573.
  28. Southard TE, Southard KA, Tolley EA. Periodontal force: a potential cause of relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:221-227.
  29. Eissmann, H.F. Wax pattern fabrication. In: Eissmann HF, Rudd KD, Morrow RM, eds. Dental Laboratory Procedure - fixed partial denture. St. Louis, MO, USA: C.V. Mosby Co. 1980:144-146.
  30. Sturdevant, J.R. & Sturdevant, C.M. Gold inlay and gold onlay restoration for ClassII cavity preparations. In: Sturdevant C, Barton R, Sockwell C, Strickland W, eds. The Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. St. Louis, MO, USA: C.V. Mosby Co. 1985:490.
  31. Malone, W.F.P., Koth, D.L., Cavazos, E. Jr., Kaiser, D.A. & Morgano, S.M. Laboratory support for fixed prosthodontics. In: Gregore H, ed. Theory and Practice of Fixed Prosthodontics, 8th edn, St. Louis, MO, USA: Ishiyaku EuroAmerica. 1993:288-289.
  32. Kato H. The function of the tooth supporting structures. Part I. A method of measuring tooth displacement in two dimensions. J Jpn Prosthodont Soc 1981;25:733-745.
  33. Kato H. The function of the tooth supporting structures. Part II. The dynamics of molars in function and at rest. J Jpn Prosthodont Soc 1982;26:133-147.
  34. Kasahara K, Miura H, Kuriyama M, Kato H, Hasegawa S. Observations of interproximal contact relations during clenching. Int J Prosthodontics 2000;13:289-294.
  35. Oh SH, Nakano M, Bando E, Keisuke N, Shigemoto S, Jeong JH et al. Relationship between occlusal tooth contact patterns and tightness of proximal tooth contact. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:749-753.
  36. Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. Comparative evaluation of the oral tactile function by means of teeth or implant-supported prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2:75-80.
  37. Weiner S, Sirois D, Ehrenberg D, Lehrmann N, Simon B, Zohn H. Sensory responses from loading of implants: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:44-51.
  38. Muhlbradt L, Ulrich R, Möhlmann H, Schmid H. Mechanoperception of natural teeth versus endosseous implants revealed by magnitude estimation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:125-130.
  39. Sekine H et al. Mobility characteristics and tactile sensitivity of osseointegrated fixture-supporting systems. In: van Steenberghe D, ed. Tissue integration in oral maxillofacial reconstructions. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1986:306-332.
  40. Kim SP. Evaluation of tightness of proximal tooth contact on implant prostheses. Phd Thesis, IN, Korea: Chosun University School of Dentistry. 2008.
  41. Fuhrmann R, Grave C, Diedrich P. In vitro evaluation of a measurement method to analyze the interdental, mesially directed force. J Orofacial Orthop 1998; 59:362-370.
  42. Miyamoto K, Yamada K, Ishizuka Y, Morimoto N, Tanne K. Masseter muscle activity during the whole day in young adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:394-398.
  43. Southard TE, Behrents RG, Tolley EA. The anterior component of occlusal force: Part I. Measurement and distribution. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:493-500.
  44. Omar R, Wise MD. Mandibular flexure associated with muscle force applied in the retruded axis position. J Oral Rehabil 1981;8:209-221.
  45. Korioth TWP, Versluis A, Beyer JP. Numerical simulation of approximal dental contact forces during clenching. J Dent Res 1997;76:245-250.
  46. Shames IH. Engineering Mechanics, Vol.1, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1966;170-174.
  47. Wolpoff MH. Interstitial wear. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1971;34:205-227.
  48. Satsuma T. Measurement and analysis of upper first molar movement in six-degree-of-freedom. J Japan Prosthodontic Soc. 1999;43:344-354.