DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparing Elder Users' Interaction Behavior to the Younger: Focusing on Tap, Move and Flick Tasks on a Mobile Touch Screen Device

  • Lim, Ji-Hyoun (Department of Industrial Engineering, Hongik University) ;
  • Ryu, Tae-Beum (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Hanbat National University)
  • Received : 2012.01.20
  • Accepted : 2012.03.07
  • Published : 2012.04.30

Abstract

Objective: This study presents an observation and analysis on behavioral characteristics of old users in comparison to young users in the use of control on display interface. Background: Touch interface which allows users to control directly on display, is conceived as delight and easy way of human-computer interaction. Due to the advantage in stimulus-response ensemble, the old users, who typically experiencing difficulties in interacting with computer, would expected to have better experience in using computing machines. Method: Twenty nine participants who are over 50 years old and 14 participants who are in 20s years old were participated in this study. Three primary tasks in touch interface, which are tap, move, and flick, were delivered by the users. For the tap task, response time and point of touch response were collected and the response bias was calculated for each trial. For the move task, delivery time and the distance of finger movements were recorded for each trial. For the flick task, task completion time and flicking distance were recorded. Results: From the collected behavioral data, temporal and spatial differences between young and old users behavior were analyzed. The older users showed difficulty in completing move task requiring eye-hand coordination.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi, J., Lee, S. & Cho, J. E., "The usability evaluation of mobile phone interfaces designed for the elderly", J. of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 30(1), 265-273, 2011. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2011.30.1.265
  2. Echt, K. V., Morrell, R. W. & Park, D. C., "Effect of age and training formats on basic computer skill acquisition in older adults". Educational Gerontology, 24, 3-25, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1080/0360127980240101
  3. Gitlin, L. N., "Why older people accept or reject assistive technology", Journal of the American Society on Aging, Vol. XIX, No.1, 1995.
  4. ISO/TR 22411, Ergonomics data and guidelines for the application of ISO/IEC Guide 71 to products and services to address the needs of older persons and persons with disabilities, ISO/TC 159, 01.120, 2008.
  5. Jung, K. T., "The elderly's error characteristics in some human interactions", J. of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 30(1), 109-115, 2011. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2011.30.1.109
  6. Kim, J. W., Introduction to Human Computer Interaction, AhnGraphics, 2005.
  7. Kim, J. Y., Kim S. H. & Cho Y. J., "The user characteristics of different age group to design mobile phone", J. of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 29(3), 297-310, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2010.29.3.297
  8. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T. and Osman, A., Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis of stimulus-response compatibility-A model and taxonomy, Psychological Review, 97, 253-270, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.253
  9. Lee, D., Chung, M. J. & Kim, J. Y., "An investigation of using practices for universal design of information technology products". J. of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 28(3), 103-114, 2009. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2009.28.3.103
  10. Leonardi, C., Albertini, A., Pianesi, F. & Zancanaro. M., "An exploratory study of a touch-based gestural interface of elderly", NordiCHI 2010, October 12-20, 2010.
  11. MacManus, R., "Older people not using smartphones or digital media", ReadWriteWeb, August 2, 2011. URL: http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/older_people_not_using_smartphones_or_digital_media.php
  12. Murata, A. & Iwase, H., "Usability of touch-panel interface for old adults". Human Factors, 47(4), 767-776, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872005775570952
  13. Naveh-Benjamin, M., "Adult age differences in memory performance: test of an associative deficit hypothesis". J. of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(5), 1170-1187, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1170
  14. Nettelbeck, T. & Rabbitt, P. M. A, "Aging, cognitive performance, and mental speed". Intelligence, 16, 189-205, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896(92)90004-B
  15. Salthouse, T. A., Berish, D. E. & Miles, J. D., "The role of cognitive stimulation on the relations between age and cognitive functioning", Psychology and Aging, 17(4), 548-447, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.17.4.548
  16. Yan, J. H., Effects of aging on linear and curvilinear aiming arm movements, Experimental Aging Research, 26, 393-407, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1080/036107300750015778
  17. Yang, Y. A., Jo, E. J., Park, S. H., Park, S. J., Kim, H. R., Lee, M. H. & Yang, M. Y., "An analysis of factors affection of elderly's speed of mobile phone ability". J. of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 37(4), 1-8, 2008.
  18. Wendy A. Rogers, Handbook of Human Factors and the Older Adults, Academic Press, 1997.