대한공간정보학회지 (Journal of Korean Society for Geospatial Information Science)

  • 제20권1호
  • /
  • Pages.73-81
  • /
  • 2012
  • /
  • 1598-2955(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-6693(eISSN)
대한공간정보학회 (Korea Spatial Information Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Development Directions of U-City Competitiveness Index

  • 투고 : 2012.01.31
  • 심사 : 2012.02.22
  • 발행 : 2012.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 U-City 경쟁력의 개념 및 U-City 관련 지수의 연구동향을 파악하여 U-City 경쟁력 지수의 개발방향을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 먼저 정보화시대, 미래도시, U-City의 개념을 관련문헌을 토대로 파악하고, U-City경쟁력의 개념을 제시하였다. 다음으로 U-City를 비롯한 미래도시 관련 지수의 연구동향을 파악하여 U-City 경쟁력 지수 개발에의 시사점을 도출하였다. 마지막으로 U-City 경쟁력지수 개발 절차와 각 단계에서의 유의점을 제시하였다. 연구결과 U-City 경쟁력은 거주민의 요구사항에 대한 신속한 대응 및 도시공간 관리의 효율성을 극대화할 수 있는 ICT, U-City 인프라, U-City 서비스, U-City 관리 능력을 의미하며, 이를 측정하기 위해 평가체계의 마련, 평가지표의 선정, 표준화, 지표별 가중치 산정, 평가모형 설정의 개발절차가 필요한 것으로 파악되었다.

This study ultimately aims to suggest directions for development of U-City Competitiveness Index through thorough analyses of U-City competitiveness concepts and previous research in U-City-related index. In an attempt to reach the aforementioned goals, the concept of U-City competitiveness is presented based on existing publications on informatization age, future city, and U-City. Next, insights on the development of U-City Competitiveness Index are provided via analysis of research on indices regarding U-City and future city. Finally, the process of developing UCity Competitiveness Index and cautionary comments for each developmental step has been provided. Based on the research results, U-City competitiveness refers to the ability to respond to demands of residents in a timely manner as well as to manage U-City, ICT, U-City infrastructure, and U-City services that maximizes the efficiency of urban space management. In order for proper assessment of these criteria, development of assessment tools, selection of indices, standardization, allocation of weight per index, and construction of assessment framework are required.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C. and Nijkamp, P., 2009, Smart Cities in Europe, Proc. of the 3rd Central European Conference in Regional Science.
  2. Carvalho, L., 2012, Urban Competitiveness, U‐City Strategies and the Development of Technological Niches in Songdo, South Korea, in Melih Bulu(ed.), 2012, City Competitiveness and Improving Urban Subsystems: Technologies and Applications, IGI Global, Hershey, PA, pp.197‐216.
  3. Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler‐Milanovic, N., and Meijers, E., 2007, Smart Cities‐Ranking of European Medium‐Sized Cities, Center of Regional Science, Vienna University of Technology, pp.5-14, 22-23.
  4. Hong, H.J. and Shim, J.H., 2010, Future City via Smart City, National Information Society Agency, pp.3-15.
  5. Intelligent Community Forum, 2006, What is an Intelligent Community.
  6. Kim, K., Chun, J.Y., Shin, D.B., Lim, S.Y., 2011,Research Trends of U‐City Theses in Korea and Oversea, Journal of the Korean Society for Geo‐ Spatial Information System, Vol.19, No.1, pp.53-61.
  7. KRIHS, 2012, Research Trends on U‐City Index, UCity e‐Report, Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, Vol.1, pp.10-19.
  8. Lee, S.H. and Leem, Y.T., 2010, Ubiquitous City Strategic Roadmapping Model, Journal of Korea Planners Association, Vol.45, No.6, pp.179-190.
  9. Malecki E.J., 2007, Cities and Regions Competing in the Global Economy: Knowledge and Local Development Policies, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Vol.25, pp.638-654. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0645
  10. Shin, D.B., 2011, A Study on the Change of Urban Space and the Direction of Urban Planning in the UCity Age, Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, pp.13-19, 67-75.
  11. Taipei Institute for Information Industry, 2010, Smart City Index & Development, https://www.intelligentcommunity.org/clientuploads/PDFs/BBE201 0‐Workshop‐Yueh‐III.pdf
  12. Van Den Berg, L. and Braun, E., 1999, Urban Competitiveness, Marketing and the Need for Organizing Capacity, Urban Studies, Vol.36, No.5-6, pp.987-999. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098993312
  13. Webster, D. and Muller, L., 2000, Urban Cometitiveness Assessment in Developing Country Urban Regions: The Road Forward, Towards a Methodology for Conducting City Development Strategies, The World Bank, Washington D.C., pp.1-42.