DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

고령운전자 운전 및 신체특성을 반영한 교통사고 분석 연구

Analysis of Elderly Drivers' Accident Models Considering Operations and Physical Characteristics

  • 투고 : 2012.08.09
  • 심사 : 2012.11.19
  • 발행 : 2012.12.31

초록

65세 이상 고령운전자의 경우 지난 10년 새 교통사고건수는 3만 7,000건에서 27만 4,000건으로 무려 640.5% 증가되었다. 이는 전체사고에서 차지하는 비율이 1.2%에서 3.1배 증가한 3.7%를 차지하고 있는 것으로 교통안전 관련기관에서는 여러 대책을 강구하고 있다. 무엇보다 고령운전자의 행동특성 및 신체특성에 대한 심층연구를 통해 안전대책과 연계하는 방안이 중요하다 할 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 고령운전자의 행동특성을 측정할 수 있는 운전자 적성검사(Driving Aptitude) 항목과 교통사고 자료를 토대로 고령운전자 운전특성과 사고특성을 연결한 실증연구를 수행하였다. 영향모형 개발을 위해 활용한 방법론은 영과잉 회귀모형을 적용하였고, ZIP 회귀모형과 ZINB 회귀모형에 대하여 베이지안 추론을 이용한 사고예측 모형을 선택하였다. AAE분석결과 ZIP 회귀모형이 적합하며, 3가지 변수속도예측, 주의전환, 인지능력이 고령자사고와 영향관계에 있음을 확인할 수 있었다.

The number of traffic accidents caused by elderly drivers over the age of 65 has surged over the past ten years from 37,000 to 274,000 cases. The proportion of elderly drivers' accidents has jumped 3.1 times from 1.2% to 3.7% out of all traffic accidents, and traffic safety organizations are pursuing diverse measures to address the situation. Above all, connecting safety measures with an in-depth research on behavioral and physical characteristics of elderly drivers will prove vital. This study conducted an empirical research linking the driving characteristics and traffic accidents by elderly drivers based on the Driving Aptitude Test items and traffic accident data, which enabled the measurement of behavioral characteristics of elderly drivers. In developing the Influence Model, we applied the zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP) regression model and selected an accident prediction model based on the Bayesian Influence in regards to the ZIP regression model and the zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) regression model. According to the results of the AAE analysis, the ZIP regression model was more appropriate and it was found that three variables? prediction of velocity, diversion, and cognitive ability? had a relation of influence with traffic accidents caused by elderly drivers.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abdel-Aty M., (2003), Analysis of driver injury severity levels at multiple locations using ordered probit models. Journal of Safety Research 34, pp.597- 603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2003.05.009
  2. C. J. O'Donnell, et al. (1996), Predicting the severity of motor vehicle accident injuries using models of ordered multiple choice, Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol.28, pp.739-753. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(96)00050-4
  3. Ceccarini Olivia (2008), Does experience rating matter in reducing accident probabilities? A test for moral hazard, University of Pennsylvania.
  4. Ciro Caliendo, et al. (2007), A crash-prediction model for multilane roads, Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol.39, pp.657-670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.10.012
  5. Dobbins D. A., Tiedemann J. G., & Skordahl D. M. (1963), Vigilance under highway driving conditions, perceptual and Motor Skill, pp.16-38.
  6. Evans L. (1991), Traffic Safety and the Driver, New York, van nostrand.
  7. Kara Maria Kockelman, et al. (2002), Driver injury severity: an application of ordered probit models, Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol.34, pp.313-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00028-8
  8. Kelvin K. W. Yau (2004), Risk factors affecting the severity of single vehicle traffic accidents in Hong Kong, Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol.36, pp.333-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00012-5
  9. L. Staplin, et al., (1990), Traffic control design elements for accommodation drivers with diminished capacity, Final technical report, US DOT, Federal Highway Administration, Ketron, Inc.
  10. Lim A. K., et al., (2006), Bayesian Analysis of a Zeroinflated Poisson Regression Model: An Application to Korean Oral Hygienic Data, The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics, vol.19 No.3 pp.505-519 https://doi.org/10.5351/KJAS.2006.19.3.505
  11. Lim C. S., (2009), Factors Affecting Traffic Accident Occurrence Rate PUKYONG NATIONAL University, Ph.. D. Degree
  12. Lim S. H., (2009), Analysis on the Running Safety and Investment Effect by Severity Model of Big Traffic Accidents. MOKWON University, Ph.. D. Degree
  13. Li-Yen Chang, Hsiu-Wen Wang (2006), Analysis of traffic injury severity: An application of non-parametric classification tree techniques, Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol.38, pp.1019-1027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.04.009
  14. Malaterre G. (1990), Error analysis and in-depth accident studies, Ergonomics, pp.1403-1421.
  15. Maria Staubach (2009), Factors correlated with traffic accidents as a basis for evaluating Advanced Driver Assistance Systems, Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol.41, Issue 5, pp.1025-1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.06.014
  16. Myoung M. H., (2008), A Study on the Noncompliance of Traffic Safety Regulatory Policy. SUNGKYUNKWAN University, Ph.. D. Degree`
  17. Olson P. L., Sivak M., (1986), Perception-response time to unexpected roadway hazards. Human Factors, 28, pp.96-99.
  18. Parasuraman, R., Nestor, P.G., (1991), Attention and Driving Skills in Aging and Alzheimer's Desease, HUMAN FACTORS, 33(5), pp.539-557.
  19. Shankar V. N., et al. (1997), Modeling accident frequencies as zero-altered probability processes: An empirical inquiry. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 29(6), pp.829-837. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(97)00052-3
  20. Treat, J. R., et al, (1997), Tri-level Study of the Cause of Traffic Accident, Report No. DOT-HS-034-3-535-77 (TAC), Indiana Univ.
  21. Yoon B. J., (2006), Development of Traffic Accident Forecasting Models by Interchange Ramp Types of Freeway. YONSEI University, Ph.. D. Degree

피인용 문헌

  1. Analysis on the Auto Accident Risks of the Old vol.33, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7470/jkst.2015.33.1.100
  2. A Comparative Study on Job Satisfaction of Road Freight Transportation Industry Workers by Type of Employment vol.33, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7470/jkst.2015.33.4.368
  3. Traffic Safety Technology Proposal for Chungcheong Region vol.16, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.2.1524
  4. 머신러닝 기반의 수도권 지역 고령운전자 차대사람 사고심각도 분류 연구 vol.19, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2021.19.4.025