Journal of Advanced Navigation Technology (한국항행학회논문지)

The Korean Navigation Institute (한국항행학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Autonomous flight Algorithm Design

자율형 운항 알고리즘 설계 연구

  • 이대용 (한국항공대학교 항공운항관리학과) ;
  • 강자영 (한국항공대학교 항공체계시험인증연구센터)
  • Received : 2012.01.20
  • Accepted : 2012.02.28
  • Published : 2012.02.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Airborne separation assurance is a key requirement for Free Flight. This paper is to propose autonomous flight algorithm, such as extended authority of delegation, efficiency of airspace issue to deal with the empirical solution for free flight, and to measure flight efficiency and conflict detection and resolution (CD&R) by utilizing flight performance data under the two circumstances of scenario with the modeling of proposed algorithm and potential field algorithm. The results show that the autonomous flight algorithm is superior to the potential field algorithm under the circumstances of free flight airspace in terms of algorithm performance, CD&R, and flight efficiency.

항공기 분리보증은 자유비행의 핵심요구사항이다. 본 논문에서는 위임권한 확대, 공역 효율성 문제 등 자유비행의 실증적 문제해결을 위해 자율형 운항 알고리즘을 제안하고, 제안된 알고리즘과 포텐셜 필드 알고리즘을 모델링하여 두 가지 조건의 시나리오 상황에서 항공기 성능 데이터를 활용, 알고리즘 성능 및 충돌해결과 운항 자율성 효과 등을 측정하였다. 실험결과 자유비행 공역 하에서 자율형 운항 알고리즘이 포텐셜 필드 알고리즘보다 알고리즘 성능, 충돌해결, 운항 자율성 효과 측면에서 우수하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Delegation of separation assurance to aircraft: towards a framework for analyzing the different concepts and underlying principles, Karim Zeghal & Eric Hoffman, ICAS 2000 CONGRESS, 2002.
  2. 이대용, 강자영, "자유비행 공역 혼잡성 측정에 관한 연구" 한국항행학회 학술발표 논문집 Vol. 15, No. 1 pp. 145-149. 2011. 10. 21
  3. 이대용, 강자영, "자유비행 분리보증 효율성 측정 모델연구" 한국항행학회 논문지 제15권 제6호 pp. 976-985. 2011. 12. 31
  4. Airspace company measurement an air traffic control simulation analysis Parimal Kopardekar, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA Albert Schwartz, Sherri Magyarits, and Jessica Rhodes, Federal Aviation Administration, Atlantic City, NJ, USA, pp. 1-6
  5. Elena Deza & Michel Marie Deza (2009) Encyclopedia of Distances, page 94, Springer.
  6. J.Matas, R. Marik, and J.Littler, "On representation and matching of multi-colored objects," Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp.726-732, 1995
  7. Survey of Conflict Detection and Resolution Modeling Methods James K. Kuchar, Lee C. Yang, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139, 1997
  8. Unmanned Aircraft Collision Detection and Resolution: Concept and Survey B. M. Albaker, N. A. Rahim UMPEDAC Research Centre, Faculty of Engineering University of Malaya 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  9. Anon, "User Manual for the Base of Aircraft (BADA), Rev. 3.1," Eurocontrol, EEC Note No. 25/98, November 1998.
  10. www.aerospaceweb.org
  11. iFly Deliverable D5.1 Comparative Study of Conflict Resolution Methods Version: Final (1.2), G. Chaloulos(ETHZ), J.Lygeros(ETHZ), I. Roussos(NTUA), K. Kyriakopoulos(NTUA), E. Siva(UCAM), A. Lecchini-Visintini (ULES), P. Casek (HNWL), pp. 6-10. 22 November 2007
  12. Performance evaluation of airborne separation assurance for free flight, AIAA2000-4269, pp. 8. 14 - 17 August 2000
  13. 이대용, 강자영, "자유비행 충돌회피 알고리즘 비교분석" 한국항공운항학회 논문지 제 19권 제 4호 pp. 83-90. 2011. 12. 31

Cited by

  1. 자유비행 다중 충돌회피 효율성 측정 연구 vol.16, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12673/jkoni.2012.16.2.197