DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Growth Performance of Transgenic Mud Loach Misgurnus mizolepis Carrying a GH Transgene Driven by Mud Loach C-Type Lectin Regulator

  • Song, Ha-Yeon (Department of Marine Bio-Materials and Aquaculture, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Soo (Department of Marine Bio-Materials and Aquaculture, Pukyong National University)
  • Received : 2011.09.05
  • Accepted : 2011.11.29
  • Published : 2012.03.30

Abstract

Growth hormone (GH) transgenesis in fish has the potential to improve aquaculture efficiency and capacity. However, many fast-growing transgenic fish have experienced side effects caused by excess GH expression. To overcome this unwanted issue associated with several GH transgenic mud loach Misgurnus mizolepis lines carrying GH construct driven by a strong ${\beta}$-actin regulator ($pml{\beta}$-actGH), we performed an alternative version of GH autotransgenesis using a weaker but more stable regulator, the mud loach lectin promoter. GH transgenesis with a pmlectGH construct consisting of the mud loach GH gene driven by the 2.3-kb lectin promoter exhibited significant growth stimulation. However, the extent of the growth acceleration in pmlectGH transgenics (six times maximum when assessed 2 months post hatching) was much less than that in transgenic individuals carrying the $pml{\beta}$-actGH construct. Additionally, the extraordinary gigantism that was common in $pml{\beta}$-actGH-transgenic mud loaches was diminished in transgenic loaches harboring the pmlectGH construct. Transgenic founders (pmlectGH) successfully transmitted their transgene into the next generation with up to 41% frequency. Growth stimulation also persisted in the transgenic F1 strains, with a seven-fold increase in maximum body weight at 6 months of age.

Keywords

References

  1. Devlin RH, Yesaki TY, Biagi CA, Donaldson EM, Swanson P and Chan WK. 1994. Extraordinary salmon growth. Nature 371, 209-210. https://doi.org/10.1038/371209a0
  2. Devlin RH, Yesaki YT, Donaldson EM, Du SJ and Hew CL. 1995. Production of germline transgenic Pacific salmonids with dramatically increased growth performance. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 52, 1376-1384. https://doi.org/10.1139/f95-133
  3. Devlin RH, Biagi CA and Yesaki TY. 2004. Growth, viability and genetic characteristics of GH transgenic coho salmon strains. Aquaculture 236, 607-632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.02.026
  4. Dunham RA. 2004. Aquaculture and Fisheries Biotechnology: Genetic Approaches. CABI Publishing, Oxford, GB.
  5. Gong Z, Maclean N, Devlin RH, Martinez R, Omitogun O and Estrada MP. 2007. Gene construct and expression: information relevant for risk assessment and management. In: Environment Risk Assessment of Genetically Modified Organisms. Vol. 3. Methods for Transgenic Fish. Kapuscinski AR, Hayes KR, Li S and Dana G, eds. CABI Publishing, Oxford, GB, pp. 95-111.
  6. Grabher C, Joly JS and Wittbrodt J. 2004. Highly efficient zebrafish transgenesis mediated by the meganuclease I-SceI. Methods Cell Biol 77, 381-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-679X(04)77021-1
  7. Iyengar A, Müller F and Maclean N. 1996. Regulation and expression of transgenes in fish: a review. Transgenic Res 5, 147-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01969704
  8. Kapuscinski AR. 2005. Current scientific understanding of the environmental biosafety of transgenic fish and shellfish. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epizoot 24, 309-322. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.24.1.1576
  9. Kim DS, Jo JY and Lee TY. 1994. Induction of triploidy in mud loach (Misgurnus mizolepis) and its effect on gonad development and growth. Aquaculture 120, 263-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(94)90083-3
  10. Kim DS, Kim BS, Lee SJ, Park IS and Nam YK. 2004. Comparative analysis of inherited patterns of the transgene in transgenic mud loach Misgurnus mizolepis lines carrying the CAT reporter gene. Fish Sci 70, 201-210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-2906.2003.00792.x
  11. Nam YK. 2005. Tailoring fish genome and transgenic manipulation as exemplified by mud loach (Misgurnus mizolepis). Fish Genet Breed Sci 35, 113-119.
  12. Nam YK, Noh CH and Kim DS. 1999. Transmission and expression of an integrated reporter construct in three generations of transgenic mud loach (Misgurnus mizolepis). Aquaculture 172, 229-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00433-5
  13. Nam YK, Noh JK, Cho YS, Cho HJ, Cho KN, Kim CG and Kim DS. 2001. Dramatically accelerated growth and extraordinary gigantism of transgenic mud loach Misgurnus mizolepis. Transgenic Res 10, 353-362. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016696104185
  14. Nam YK, Cho YS, Cho HJ and Kim DS. 2002. Accelerated growth performance and stable germ-line transmission in androgenetically derived homozygous transgenic mud loach, Misgurnus mizolepis. Aquaculture 209, 257-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00730-X
  15. Nam YK, Park JE, Kim KK and Kim DS. 2003. A rapid and simple PCR-based method for analysis of transgenic fish using a restricted amount of fin tissue. Transgenic Res 12, 523-525. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024274508052
  16. Nam YK, Maclean N, Fu C, Pandian TJ and Eguia MRR. 2007. Development of transgenic fish: scientific background. In: Environment Risk Assessment of Genetically Modified Organisms. Vol. 3. Methodologies for Transgenic Fish. Kapuscinski AR, Hayes KR, Li S and Dana G, eds. CABI Publishing, Oxford, GB, pp. 61-94.
  17. Pandian TJ and Marian LA. 1994. Problems and prospects of transgenic fish production. Curr Sci 66, 635-649.
  18. Rahman MA and Maclean N. 1999. Growth performance of transgenic tilapia containing an exogenous piscine growth hormone gene. Aquaculture 173, 333-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00456-6
  19. Rahman MA, Hwang GL, Razak SA, Sohm F and Maclean N. 2000. Copy number related transgene expression and mosaic somatic expression in hemizygous and homozygous transgenic tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Transgenic Res 9, 417-427. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026517212807
  20. Thermes V, Grabher C, Ristoratore F, Bourrat F, Choulika A, Wittbrodt J and Joly JS. 2002. I-SceI meganuclease mediates highly efficient transgenesis in fish. Mech Dev 118, 91-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4773(02)00218-6