DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative proteomic analysis of plant responses to sound waves in Arabidopsis

  • Kwon, Young Sang (Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 program), Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Research Center, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Jeong, Mi-Jeong (Bio-crop Development Division, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Cha, Jaeyul (Department of Applied Biology, College of Agriculture and Research Institute of Life Science, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Jeong, Sung Woo (Department of Chemistry and Research Institute of Life Science, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Park, Soo-Chul (Bio-crop Development Division, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Shin, Sung Chul (Department of Chemistry and Research Institute of Life Science, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Chung, Woo Sik (Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 program), Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Research Center, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Bae, Hanhong (School of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Bae, Dong-Won (Center for Research Facility, Gyeongsang National University)
  • 투고 : 2012.11.02
  • 심사 : 2012.11.16
  • 발행 : 2012.12.31

초록

Environmental factors greatly influence the growth, development, and even genetic characteristics of plants. The mechanisms by which sound influences plant growth, however, remain obscure. Previously, our group reported that several genes were differentially regulated by specific frequenciesof sound treatmentusing a sound-treated subtractive library. In this study, we used a proteomic approach to investigate plant responses to sound waves in Arabidopsis. The plants were exposed to 250-Hz or 500-Hz sound waves, and total proteins were extracted from leaves 8 h and 24 h after treatment. Proteins extracted from leaves were subjected to 2-DE analysis. Thirty-eight spots were found to be differentially regulated in response to sound waves and were identified using MALDI-TOF MS and MALDI-TOF/TOF MS. The functions of the identified proteins were classified into photosynthesis, stress and defense, nitrogen metabolism, and carbohydrate metabolism. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the analysis of protein changes in response to sound waves in Arabidopsis leaves. These findings provide a better understanding of the molecular basis of responses to sound waves in Arabidopsis.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn YO, Shimizu B, Sakata K, Gantulga D, Zhou C, Bevan DR, Esen A (2009) Scopolin-hydrolyzing beta-glucosidases in roots of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol 51:132-143
  2. Badger MR, Price GD (1994) The role of carbonic anhydrase in photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 45:369-392 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.45.060194.002101
  3. Bernard SM, Habash DZ (2009) The importance of cytosolic glutamine synthetase in nitrogenassimilation and recycling. New Phytol 182:608-620 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02823.x
  4. Bilgin DD, Zavala JA, Zhu J, Clough SJ, Ort DR, DeLucia EH (2010) Biotic stressglobally downregulates photosynthesis genes. Plant Cell Environ 33:1597-1613 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02167.x
  5. Bochu W, Xin C, Zhen W, Qizhong F, Hao Z, Liang R (2003) Biological effect of sound fieldstimulation on paddy rice seeds. Colloids SurfB Biointerfaces 32:29-34 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7765(03)00128-0
  6. Bochu W, Jiping S, Biao L, Jie L, Chuanren D (2004) Soundwave stimulation triggers thecontent change of the endogenous hormone of the Chrysanthemum mature callus. Colloids SurfB Biointerfaces 37:107-112 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2004.03.004
  7. Braam J, Sistrunk ML, Polisensky DH, Xu W, Purugganan MM, Antosiewicz DM, Campbell P, Johnson KA (1997) Plant responses to environmental stress: regulation and functions of the Arabidopsis TCH genes. Planta 203:35-41
  8. Chen H, McCaig BC, Melotto M, He SY, Howe GA (2004) Regulation of plant arginase bywounding, jasmonate, and the phytotoxincoronatine. J Biol Chem 279:5998-6007
  9. Cortleven A, Noben JP, Valcke R (2011) Analysis of the photosynthetic apparatus in transgenictobacco plants with altered endogenous cytokinin content: a proteomic study. Proteome Sci 9:33 https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-5956-9-33
  10. Fan P, Feng J, Jiang P, Chen X, Bao H, Nie L, Jiang D, Lv S, Kuang T, Li Y (2011) Coordination of carbon fixation and nitrogen metabolism in Salicorniaeuropaea under salinity:Comparative proteomic analysis on chloroplast proteins. Proteomics 11: 4346-4367 https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201100054
  11. Fukao Y, Ferjani A, Fujiwara M, Nishimori Y, Ohtsu I (2009) Identification of zinc-responsive proteins in the roots of Arabidopsis thaliana using a highly improved method of two-dimensionalelectrophoresis. Plant Cell Physiol 50:2234-2239 https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcp154
  12. Goulas E, Schubert M, Kieselbach T, Kleczkowski LA, Gardeström P, Schröder W, Hurry V (2006) The chloroplast lumen and stromal proteomes of Arabidopsis thaliana show differential sensitivity to short- and long-term exposure to low temperature. Plant J 47:720-734. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02821.x
  13. Herbette S, de Labrouhe DT, Drevet JR, Roeckel-Drevet P (2011) Transgenic tomatoesshowing higher glutathione peroxydase antioxidant activity are more resistant to an abiotic stress butmore susceptible to biotic stresses. Plant Sci 180:548-553 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.12.002
  14. Jaffe MJ, Forbes S (1993) Thigmomorphogenesis: the effect of mechanical perturbation on plants. Plant Growth Regul 12: 313-324 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00027213
  15. Jeong MJ, Shim CK, Lee JO, Kwon HB, Kim YH, Lee SK, Byun MO, Park SC (2008) Plant gene responses to frequency-specific sound signals. MolBreeding 21:217-226
  16. Jiang HW, Liu MJ, Chen IC, Huang CH, Chao LY, Hsieh HL (2010) A Glutathione S-Transferase Regulated by Light and Hormones Participates in the Modulation of Arabidopsis SeedlingDevelopment. Plant Physiol 154:1646-1658 https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.159152
  17. Johnson KA, Sistrunk ML, Polisensky DH, Braam J (1998) Arabidopsis thaliana Responsesto Mechanical Stimulation Do Not Require ETR1 or EIN2. PlantPhysiol 116:643-649
  18. Katayama H, Nagasu T, Oda Y (2001) Improvement of in-gel digestion protocol for peptide massfingerprinting by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid CommunMass Spectrom 15:1416-1421 https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.379
  19. Kato-Noguchi H, Tanaka Y (2008) Effect of ABA-beta-Dglucopyranosyl ester and activity ofABA-beta-D-glucosidase in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Plant Physiol 165:788-790 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2007.04.005
  20. Keli S,BaoshuX (1999) The effect of alternative stress on the thermodynamical properties ofcultured tobacco cells. Acta Biophysica Sinica 15:579-583
  21. Kosova K, Vitamvas P, Prasil IT, Renaut J (2011) Plant proteome changes under abiotic stress-Contribution of proteomics studies to understanding plant stress response. J Proteomics 74:1301-1322 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2011.02.006
  22. Kwon YS, Ryu CM, Lee S, Park HB, Han KS, Lee JH, Lee K, Chung WS, Jeong MJ, Kim HK, Bae DW (2010) Proteome analysis of Arabidopsis seedlings exposed to bacterialvolatiles. Planta 232:1355-1370 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-010-1259-x
  23. Lee D, Polisensky DH,Braam J (2005) Genome-wide identification of touch- and darkness-regulated Arabidopsis genes: a focus on calmodulin-like and XTH genes. New Phytol 165: 429-444
  24. Lee K, Kye M, Jang JS, Lee OJ, Kim T, Lim D (2004) Proteomic analysis revealed a strongassociation of a high level of alpha1-antitrypsin in gastric juice with gastric cancer. Proteomics 4:3343-3352 https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200400960
  25. Lee KH, Piao HL, Kim HY, Choi SM, Jiang F, Hartung W, Hwang I, Kwak JM, Lee IJ, Hwang I (2006) Activation of glucosidase via stress-induced polymerization rapidly increasesactive pools of abscisic acid. Cell 126:1109-1120 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.034
  26. Li B, Wei J, Wei X, Tang K, Liang Y, Shu K, Wang B (2008)Effect of sound wave stress onantioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation of Dendrobiumcandidum. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 63:269-275 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.12.012
  27. Liu Z, Taub CC, McClung CR (1996) Identification of an Arabidopsis thaliana ribulose-1,5 -bisphosphate carboxylase/ oxygenaseactivase (RCA) minimal promoter regulated by light and the circadian clock. Plant Physiol 112:43-51 https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.1.43
  28. Nunes-Nesi A, Fernie AR, Stitt M (2010) Metabolic and signaling aspects underpinning theregulation of plant carbon nitrogen interactions. Mol Plant 3:973-996 https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssq049
  29. Riccardi F, Gazeau P, de Vienne D, Zivy M (1998) Protein changes in response to progressivewater deficit in maize. Plant Physiol 117:1253-1263 https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.117.4.1253
  30. Rodriguez RE, Lodeyro A, Poli HO, Zurbriggen M, Peisker M, Palatnik JF, Tognetti VB, Tschiersch H, Hajirezaei MR, Valle EM, Carrillo N (2007) Transgenic tobacco plant soverexpressing chloroplastic ferredoxin-NADP(H) reductase display normal rates of photosynthesis and increased tolerance to oxidative stress. Plant Physiol 143:639-649
  31. Salekdeh GH, Siopongco J, Wade LJ, Ghareyazie B, Bennett J (2002) Proteomic analysis ofrice leaves during drought stress and recovery. Proteomics 2:1131-1145 https://doi.org/10.1002/1615-9861(200209)2:9<1131::AID-PROT1131>3.0.CO;2-1
  32. Sarry JE, Kuhn L, Ducruix C, Lafaye A, Junot C, Hugouvieux V, Jourdain A, Bastien O, Fievet JB, Vailhen D, Amekraz B, Moulin C, Ezan E, Garin J, Bourguignon J (2006) The earlyresponses of Arabidopsis thaliana cells to cadmium exposure explored by protein and metabolite profiling analyses. Proteomics 6:2180-2198 https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200500543
  33. Shan X, Wang J, Chua L, Jiang D, Peng W, Xie D (2010) The role of Arabidopsis Rubiscoactivase in jasmonate-induced leaf senescence. Plant Physiol 155:751-761
  34. SivaciA (2006) Seasonal changes of total carbohydrate contents in three varieties of apple (Malussylvestris Miller) stem cuttings. SciHortic 109:234-237
  35. TakahashiH, SugeH, KatoT (1991) Growth Promotion by Vibration at 50 Hz in Rice andCucumber Seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol 32:729-732 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a078137
  36. Uchida A, Yamamoto KT (2002) Effects of mechanical vibration on seed germination of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Plant Cell Physiol 43:647-651 https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcf079
  37. WangB, ZhaoH, Duan, C, SakanishiA (2002a) Effects of cell wall calcium on the growth of Chyrsanthemum callus under sound stimulation. Colloids SurfB Biointerfaces 25:189-195 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7765(01)00322-8
  38. Wang B, Zhao H, Wang X, Duan C, Wang D, Sakanishi A (2002b) Influence of sound stimulation on plasma membrane H+ATPase activity. Colloids SurfB Biointerfaces, 25:183-188 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7765(01)00320-4
  39. Wang W, Tai F, Chen S (2008) Optimizing protein extraction from plant tissues for enhancedproteomics analysis.JSepSci 31: 2032-2039
  40. Xiaocheng Y, Bochu W, Chuanren D (2003) Effects of sound stimulation on energy metabolism of Actinidiachinensis callus. Colloids SurfB Biointerfaces 30:67-72 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7765(03)00027-4
  41. Xiujuan W, Bochu W, Yi J, Chuanren D, Sakanishi A (2003) Effect of sound wave on the synthesis of nucleic acid and protein in chrysanthemum. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 29:99-102 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7765(02)00152-2
  42. Yang Y, Shah J, Klessig DF (1991) Signal perception and transduction in plant defense responses. Genes Dev 11:1621-163

피인용 문헌

  1. Exposure to Sound Vibrations Lead to Transcriptomic, Proteomic and Hormonal Changes in Arabidopsis vol.6, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33370
  2. Plant acoustics: in the search of a sound mechanism for sound signaling in plants vol.67, pp.15, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw235
  3. Production of Hypoallergenic Cocoa Beans by a Pregermination Treatment Method vol.42, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2015.42.2.123
  4. Beyond Chemical Triggers: Evidence for Sound-Evoked Physiological Reactions in Plants vol.9, pp.1664-462X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00025