DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

원심 주조한 니켈-크롬 합금의 성량 변화 및 주조 온도에 따른 산화물 측정

Composition of nickel-chromium alloy on the centrifugal casting and the influence of quantitative of oxides on the casting temperature

  • 김원수 (대전보건대학교 치기공학과)
  • Kim, Won-Soo (Department of Dental Laboratory Technology, Daejeon Health College)
  • 투고 : 2012.09.04
  • 심사 : 2012.12.24
  • 발행 : 2012.12.30

초록

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analysis the composition on the centrifugal casting and the oxide on the casting temperature. Methods: The nickel based alloy were used in this study. Wax pattern specimens (10*10*2) were invested with phosphate-bonded investment in metal rings, the liquid/powder ratio and overall burn-out schedules for these investments were followed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. After casting, the alloy specimens were evaluated as regards composition(EPMA). The casting temperatures were as follows: $1400^{\circ}C$ and $1700^{\circ}C$. The quantitative analysis of oxides were scanning electron microscope(SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy(EDS) and line scanning. Results: Nearer the injection lines showed that there is a large amount of nickel. Quantitative of oxides of Ni-Cr alloy cast from $1400^{\circ}C$ is lager than Ni-Cr alloy cast from $1700^{\circ}C$. Conclusion: Casting when using a centrifugal casting machine centrifugal force affects the composition of the alloy. The higher the temperature, the amount of oxide that is generated many.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Atsu S, Berksun S. Bond strength of three porcelains to two forms of titanium using two firing atmospheres. J Prosthet Dent, 84, 567-574, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.110267
  2. Atwood RC, Lee PD, Curtis RV. Modeling the surface contamination of investment castings. Dent Mater, 21, 178-186, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.02.010
  3. Bauer J, Cella S, Pinto MM, Rodrigues-Filho LE, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Effect of argon purity on mechanical properties, microstructure and fracture mode of commercially pure(cp) Ti and Ti-6Al-4V alloys for ceramometal dental prostheses. Biomed Mater, 4, 065002, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/4/6/065002
  4. Benatti OF, Miranda Jr WG, Muench A. In vitro and in vivo corrosion evaluation of nickelchromium- and copper-aluminum-based alloys. J Prosthet Dent, 84, 360-363, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.109377
  5. Bezzon OL, de Mattos MGC, Ribeiro RF, Rollo JM. Effect of beryllium on the castability and resistence of cerometal bonds in nickelchromium alloys. J Prosthet Dent, 80, 570- 574, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70034-4
  6. Bezzon OL, Pedrazzi H, Zaniquelli O, da Silva TB. Effect of casting technique on surface roughness and consequent mass loss after polishing of NiCr and CoCr base metal alloys: a comparative study with titanium. J Prosthet Dent, 92, 272-277, 2004.
  7. Bezzon OL, Barros C, Pagnano VO, Soriani NC. Effect of casting temperature and atmosphere on castability of Ni-Cr alloys: a comparative study with direct flame casting method. Mater Res, 9, 237-241, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392006000200022
  8. Covington JS, McBride MA, Slagle WF, Disney AL. Castability of alloys of base metal and semiprecious metal for dental castings. Oper Dent, 10, 93-97, 1985.
  9. Covington JS, McBride MA, Slagle WF, Disney AL. Beryllium localization in base metal dental casting alloys. J Biomed Mater Res, 19, 747- 750, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820190702
  10. Geis-Gersrotfer J, Weber H. In vitro substance loss due to galvanic corrosion in Ti implant/Ni-Cr superconstruction systems. Int J Oral Maxillogac Implats, 6, 475-480, 1989.
  11. Geis-Gerstorfer J, Passler K. Studies on the influence of Be content on the corrosion behavior and mechanical properties of Ni- 25Cr-10Mo alloys. Dent Mater, 9, 177-181, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90117-9
  12. Gordon T, Bowser D. Beryllium: genotoxicity and carcinogenicity. Mutat Res, 533, 99-105, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2003.08.022
  13. Hero H, Valderhaug J, Jorgensen RB. Corrosion in vivo and in vitro of a commercial NiCrBe alloy. Dent Mater, 3, 125-130, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(87)80044-1
  14. Huang HH. Surface characterization of passive film on NiCr-based dental casting alloys. Biomaterials, 24, 1575-1582, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00544-6
  15. Hulterstrom M, Nilsson U. Cobalt-Chromium as a framework material in implant-supported fixed prostheses: A 3-year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 9, 449-454, 1994.
  16. Leinfelder KF, Lemons JE. Clinical restorative materials and techniques. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1988.
  17. Mackert JR, Parry EE, Fairhurst CW. Oxide morphology and adherence on dental alloys designed for porcelain bonding. Oxid Met, 5, 319-333, 1986.
  18. Ogura K, Ohama T. Pit formation in the cathodic polarization of passive iron IV. Repair mechanism by molybdate, chromate and tungstate. Corrosion, 40, 47-51, 1984. https://doi.org/10.5006/1.3593909
  19. Okuno O, Tesk JA, Penn R. Mesh monitor casting of Ni-Cr alloys: element effects. Dent Mater, 5, 294-300, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(89)90118-8
  20. Pagnano VO, Esquivel Mde C, Leal MB, Felipucci DN, Bezzon OL. Effect of casting atmosphere on the shear bond strength of a ceramic to Ni-Cr and Ni-Cr-Be alloys. Braz Dent J, 20, 138-142, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402009000200009
  21. Pourbaix M. Atlas of electrochemical equilibria in aqueous solutions, 2nd ed., Houston: National Association of Corrosion Engineers, 1974.
  22. Tajima K, Kakigawa H, Kozono Y, Hayashi I. Oxygen and nitrogen uptake in dental Ni-Cr alloy castings by several melting methods. Dent Mater J, 3, 262-271, 1984. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.3.262
  23. Wylie CM, Shelton RM, Fleming GJ, Davenport AJ. Corrosion of nickel-based dental casting alloys. Dent Mater, 23, 714-723, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.011
  24. Zinelis S. Effect of pressure of helium, argon, krypton, and xenon on the porosity, microstructure, and mechanical properties of commercially pure titanium castings. J Prosthet Dent, 84, 575-582, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.109479