DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Multi-floor Layout for the Liquefaction Process Systems of LNG FPSO Using the Optimization Technique

최적화 기법을 이용한 LNG FPSO 액화 공정 장비의 다층 배치

  • Ku, Nam-Kug (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Joon-Chae (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Roh, Myung-Il (School of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, University of Ulsan) ;
  • Hwang, Ji-Hyun (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Kyu-Yeul (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Research Institute of Marine Systems Engineering, Seoul National University)
  • 구남국 (서울대학교 조선해양공학과 대학원) ;
  • 이준채 (서울대학교 조선해양공학과 대학원) ;
  • 노명일 (울산대학교 조선해양공학부) ;
  • 황지현 (서울대학교 조선해양공학과 대학원) ;
  • 이규열 (서울대학교 조선해양공학과 및 해양시스템공학연구소)
  • Received : 2011.11.01
  • Accepted : 2011.12.30
  • Published : 2012.02.20

Abstract

A layout of an LNG FPSO should be elaborately determined as compared with that of an onshore plant because many topside process systems are installed on the limited area; the deck of the LNG FPSO. Especially, the layout should be made as multi-deck, not single-deck and have a minimum area. In this study, a multi-floor layout for the liquefaction process, the dual mixed refrigerant(DMR) cycle, of LNG FPSO was determined by using the optimization technique. For this, an optimization problem for the multi-floor layout was mathematically formulated. The problem consists of 589 design variables representing the positions of topside process systems, 125 equality constraints and 2,315 inequality constraints representing limitations on the layout of them, and an objective function representing the total layout cost. To solve the problem, a hybrid optimization method that consists of the genetic algorithm(GA) and sequential quadratic programming(SQP) was used in this study. As a result, we can obtain a multi-floor layout for the liquefaction process of the LNG FPSO which satisfies all constraints related to limitations on the layout.

Keywords

References

  1. Barclay, M. & Shukri, T., 2007. Enhanced Single Mixed Refrigerant Process for Stranded Gas Liquefaction. LNG 15 Conference, Barcelona, Spain, 24-27 April 2007.
  2. Cha, J.H. Lee, J.C. Roh, M.I. & Lee, K.Y., 2010. Determination of the Optimal Operating Condition of the Hamworthy Mark I Cycle for LNG-FPSO. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 47(5), pp. 733-742. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2010.47.5.733
  3. Georgiadis, M.C. Schilling, G. Rotstein, G.E. & Macchietto, S., 1999. A General Mathematical Programming Approach for Process Plant Layout, Computers and Chemical Engineering, 23, pp.823-840. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-1354(99)00005-8
  4. Hwang, J.H. Roh, M.I. Cha, J.H. & Lee, K.Y., 2010. Offshore Process FEED(Front End Engineering Design) Method for Integrated Process Engineering. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 47(2), pp. 265-277. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2010.47.2.265
  5. Lee, K.Y. Cho, S.H. & Roh, M.I., 2002. An Efficient Global-Local Hybrid Optimization Method Using Design Sensitivity Analysis. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 28(4), pp.300-317. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVD.2002.001992
  6. Li, Q.Y. & Ju, Y.L., 2010. Design and Analysis of Liquefaction Process for Offshore Associated Gas Resources. Applied Thermal Engineering, 30, pp. 2518-2525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2010.07.001
  7. Lee, J.Y. Kim, W.B. Kim, H.J. & Park, C.K., 2010. Comparison of a Ship LNG Liquefaction Plant and a Large Size LNG Liquefaction Plant. Proceedings of the Annual Spring Meeting, The Society of Naval Architects of Korea, Jeju, Korea, 3-4 June 2010.
  8. Lee, J. & Leyffer, S., 2012. Mixed Integer Nonlinear Programming, Springer.
  9. Lee, J.C. et al., 2011. Determination of the Optimal Operating Condition of Dual Mixed Refrigerant Cycle of LNG FPSO Topside Liquefaction Process. accepted for publication in Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea.
  10. Mecklenburgh, J.C., 1985. Process Plant Layout, George Godwin London and New York.
  11. Penteado, F.D. & Ciric, A.R., 1996. An MINLP Approach for Safe Process Plant Layout, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 35, pp.1354-1361. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie9502547
  12. Patsiatzis, D.I. & Papageorgiou, L.G., 2002. Optimal Multi-floor Process Plant Layout, Computer and Chemical Engineering, 26, pp.575-583. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-1354(01)00781-5
  13. Park, K.T. et al., 2011. Optimal Multi-floor Plant Layout with Consideration of Safety Distance based on Mathematical Programming and Modified Consequence Analysis, Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 28(4), pp.1009-1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-010-0470-6
  14. Shukri, T., 2004. LNG Technology Selection. Hydrocarbon Engineering, 9(2), pp.71-74. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2004)9:2(71)
  15. Venkatarathnam, G., 2008. Cryogenic Mixed Refrigerant Processes, Springer.

Cited by

  1. Layout Method of a Floating Offshore Structure Using the Optimization Technique vol.18, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7315/CADCAM.2013.439
  2. Structural Safety Evaluation of Marine Loading Arm Using Finite Element Analysis vol.27, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5574/KSOE.2013.27.1.043
  3. The Research of Optimal Plant Layout Optimization based on Particle Swarm Optimization for Ethylene Oxide Plant vol.30, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2015.30.3.32
  4. Layout Optimization of LNG-Liquefaction Process on LNG-FPSO Preventing Domino Effects vol.48, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1252/jcej.14we322
  5. Multi-floor Layout Model for Topsides of Floating Offshore Plant using the Optimization Technique vol.52, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2015.52.1.77