DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Korean Guidelines for Postpolypectomy Colonoscopy Surveillance

  • Yang, Dong-Hoon (Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Hong, Sung-Noh (Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Young-Ho (Department of Internal Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Hong, Sung-Pil (Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Shin, Sung-Jae (Department of Internal Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Eun (Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Bo-In (Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Suck-Ho (Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Dong-Il (Department of Internal Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Soo (Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine) ;
  • Yang, Suk-Kyun (Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Hyo-Jong (Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Se-Hyung (Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Jung (Department of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Multi-Society Task Force for Development of Guidelines for Colorectal Polyp Screening, Surveillance and Management, Multi-Society Task Force for Development of Guidelines for Colorectal Polyp Screening, Surveillance and Management (Multi-Society Task Force for Development of Guidelines for Colorectal Polyp Screening, Surveillance and Management)
  • 투고 : 2011.12.17
  • 심사 : 2012.01.17
  • 발행 : 2012.03.30

초록

Postpolypectomy surveillance has become a major indication for colonoscopy as a result of increased use of screening colonoscopy in Korea. In this report, a careful analytic approach was used to address all available evidences to delineate the predictors for advanced neoplasia at surveillance colonoscopy and we elucidated the high risk findings of the index colonoscopy as follows: 3 or more adenomas, any adenoma larger than 10 mm, any tubulovillous or villous adenoma, any adenoma with high-grade dysplasia, and any serrated polyps larger than 10 mm. Surveillance colonoscopy should be performed five years after the index colonoscopy for those without any high-risk findings and three years after the index colonoscopy for those with one or more high risk findings. However, the surveillance interval can be shortened considering the quality of the index colonoscopy, the completeness of polypectomy, the patient's general condition, and family and medical history.

키워드

피인용 문헌

  1. Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Gastrointestinal Diseases in Korean Americans and Native Koreans Undergoing Screening Endoscopy vol.7, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl.2013.7.5.539
  2. Relationship of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease to Colorectal Neoplasia vol.84, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3904/kjm.2013.84.3.363
  3. Highlights of International Digestive Endoscopy Network 2013 vol.46, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2013.46.5.425
  4. Proximal colon cancer and serrated adenomas – hunting the missing 10% vol.13, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.13-6-557
  5. Only the Size of Resected Polyps Is an Independent Risk Factor for Delayed Postpolypectomy Hemorrhage: A 10-Year Single-Center Case-Control Study vol.30, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.4.182
  6. Risk of adenomas with high‐risk characteristics based on two previous colonoscopy vol.29, pp.12, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.12650
  7. Probability of High-Risk Colorectal Neoplasm Recurrence Based on the Results of Two Previous Colonoscopies vol.60, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3334-9
  8. Distribution of the Colonoscopic Adenoma Detection Rate According to Age: Is Recommending Colonoscopy Screening for Koreans Over the Age of 50 Safe? vol.31, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.2.46
  9. Optimizing post‐polypectomy surveillance: A practical guide for the endoscopist vol.28, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1111/den.12510
  10. Colorectal cancer screening of the general population in East Asia vol.28, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/den.12579
  11. Surveillance colonoscopy after endoscopic treatment for colorectal neoplasia: From the standpoint of the Asia–Pacific region vol.28, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1111/den.12622
  12. Long-Term Outcome and Surveillance Colonoscopy after Successful Endoscopic Treatment of Large Sessile Colorectal Polyps vol.57, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2016.57.5.1106
  13. Risk factors of nonadherence to colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy and its impact on clinical outcomes: a KASID multicenter study vol.52, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-016-1280-3
  14. The Serrated Polyp Pathway: Is It Time to Alter Surveillance Guidelines? vol.19, pp.10, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-017-0588-3
  15. Advanced Colonic Neoplasia at Follow-up Colonoscopy According to Risk Components and Adenoma Location at Index Colonoscopy: A Retrospective Study of 1,974 Asymptomatic Koreans vol.11, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl16402
  16. Unusual Local Recurrence with Distant Metastasis after Successful Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Mucosal Cancer vol.50, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2016.054
  17. Determining the optimal surveillance interval after a colonoscopic polypectomy for the Korean population? vol.15, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2017.15.1.109
  18. Guideline Adherence to Colonoscopic Surveillance Intervals after Polypectomy in Korea: Results from a Nationwide Survey vol.12, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl17403
  19. Visceral obesity as a risk factor for colorectal adenoma occurrence in surveillance colonoscopy vol.88, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2018.02.040
  20. Appropriate Surveillance Interval after Colonoscopic Polypectomy in Patients Younger than 50 Years vol.34, pp.12, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e101
  21. The current capacity and quality of colonoscopy in Korea vol.17, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2018.00060
  22. Risk of Developing Metachronous Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia After Polypectomy in Patients With Multiple Diminutive or Small Adenomas vol.114, pp.10, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000296
  23. Colorectal Polyp Prevalence According to Alcohol Consumption, Smoking and Obesity vol.17, pp.7, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072387
  24. Optimization of the surveillance strategy in patients with colorectal adenomas: A combination of clinical parameters and index colonoscopy findings vol.36, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.15237
  25. Strategies for colorectal cancer screening and post-polypectomy surveillance for young adults under age 50 vol.5, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.23838/pfm.2021.00051
  26. Increasing changes in visceral adiposity is associated with higher risk for colorectal adenoma: Multilevel analysis in a prospective cohort vol.36, pp.7, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.15364
  27. Adherence to Surveillance Guidelines after the Removal of Colorectal Polyps: A Multinational, Multicenter, Prospective Survey vol.15, pp.6, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl20166
  28. Colon Polyp Detection in Primary Health Care Institutions of Korea: Detection Rate and Issues with Following the Guidelines vol.78, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2021.123