A Preliminary Study on Public Convergent Space optimized for the Digital Convergence Era

디지털 컨버전스에 최적화된 공적융합공간 개발 시론

  • 김동섭 (서울예술대학교 실내디자인과)
  • Received : 2012.09.28
  • Accepted : 2012.12.10
  • Published : 2012.12.31

Abstract

In the Digital Convergence era, the center of social networking is moving into on-line space. This means also that space for public is moving into the on-line space. Along with this, spaces in commercial area, offered as attraction factors, are taking a role as a public space. So, this paper defines these spaces mentioned above as public space and the like. Liberal and affluent communication of Digital Convergence has caused in new spatial cognitions such like, constant social space, flowing space, temporary space, and multiple space. This means the hybridization of on-line and off-line space and the advent of public convergent space. However, it is on-line-centered convergence and has positive effects and negative effects on relationship. This paper suggests the optimization of public convergent space to solve the problems and make better a public space for relationship. For achieving this, social disclosure is grasped as the common way to start relationship both off-line and on-line, and it is proved that social disclosure has three characters such as self-presentation, corporeality, and subjectivity. Subsequently, the differences of the roles of off-line and on-line space are separated by each individual character. These are self-presentation of performance vs. storytelling, corporeality of embodiment vs. disembodiment, and self-subjectivity vs. inter-subjectivity. By recognizing that there are multilevel spectrums between the formers and the latters, this paper presents the direction of the spatial configuration of public convergent space which offers the right of manipulation of self-disclosure. It will be used for presenting the prototype of public convergent space.

Keywords

References

  1. Ananny, M., Biddick, K., & Strohecker, C., Constructing public discourse with ethnographic/SMS "texts.", Proceedings of Mobile HCI 03. New York: ACM. 2003
  2. Britannica.com, Digital Convergence
  3. Buss, D. M., Evolutionary psychology: the new science of the mind (3rd ed.), Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2007
  4. Chelune, G.J. Disclosure flexiblity and social-situational perceptions, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology Vol.45, 1977
  5. Coates, D., & Winston, T., The dilema of distress disclosure; In V.J. Derlega & J.H. Berg(Eds.), Self-disclosure, New York: Plenum num Press, 1987
  6. Cozby, P.C. Self-disclosure : A literature review, Psychological Bulletin, 79
  7. Detenber, B. H., & Reeves, B., A bio-informational theory of emotion: Motion and image size effects on viewers. Journal of Communication Vol.46 No.3, 1996
  8. Festinger, L., A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 1954
  9. Festinger, Leon. Social Pressures in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing, Stanford University Press, 1963
  10. Gaulin, S. J. C., and McBurney, D. H., Evolutionary psychology (2nd ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, 2004
  11. Hampton, K. N., Sessions, L. F., Her, E. J., & Rainie, L. Social Isolation and New Technology: How the Internet and Mobile Phones Impact Americans' Social Networks, PEW Internet, 2009
  12. Hardin, G. The Tragedy of the Commons, science Vol.162 no.3859, 1968
  13. Hillier, B., Cities as movement economies, In Droege, P. (ed.), Spatial Aspect of the Information Revolution. Intelligent Environments, North Holland, 1997
  14. Jourard, S.M. Self-disclosure : An experimental analysis of transparent self, New York :John Wiely and Sons, 1971
  15. Kaplan, A. M., Haenlein, M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons vol.53 no.1, 2010
  16. Kopomaa, T. Mobile Phones, Place-centred Communication and Neo-community in Planning, Theory and Practice Vol.3 No.2, 2002
  17. Ling, R. and Yttri, B. Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway." In Katz, J. and Aakhus, M. (eds.) Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002
  18. McPherson, M., et al. Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades, American Sociological Review Vol.71, 2006
  19. Orians, G. H. Habitat selection: general theory and application to human behavior. In J. S. Lockard (Ed.), The evolution of human social behavior, New York: Elsevier, 1980
  20. Pennebaker, J.W., & Hoover, C.W. Confiding Traumatic experience and helath; In S. Fisher and J. Reason(Eds.), Hand book of life stress, cognition and health, New York : John Wiely and Sons.
  21. Robles, E., Nass, C., & Kahn, A., The Social Life of Information Displays: How Screens Shape Psychological Responses in Social Contexts, HCI Vol.24, 2009
  22. Robles, E., Nass, C., & Kahn, A. The Social Life of Information Displays: How Screens Shape Psychological Responses in Social Contexts, Human Computer Interaction Vol.24, 2009
  23. Rodden, T., Rogers, Y., Halloran, J., & Taylor, I. Designing novel interactional workspaces to support face to face consultations, Proceedings of the CHI '03 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York: ACM. 2003
  24. Rubegni, E., Memarovic,N. and Langheinrich, M. Talking to Strangers: Using Large Public Displays to Facilitate Social Interaction ; in Proc. HCI Vol.10, 2011
  25. Scott, M. The politics of public space in the media city ; In First Monday, Special Issue no.4, 2006(Feb)
  26. Ulrich, R. S. Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In Altman, I. and Wohlwill, J. F. (Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment, New York: Plenum Press, 1981
  27. Wikipedia.org, social penetration theory
  28. Wikipedia.org, storytelling
  29. WordNet 3.0 Copyright 2006 by Princeton University, Performance
  30. Wunsch-Vincent, S. & Vickery, G. Participative Web: User -Created Content, Directorate For Science, Technology and Industry; ommittee For Information, Computer And Communications Policy, 2007
  31. Zwick & Dholakia, Mobile Technologies and Boundaryless Sapces :Slavish Lifesytles, Seductive Meanderings, or Creative Empowerment?, H.O.I.T., 2003
  32. 강옥미, 소셜스토리텔링과 SNS, 기호학연구 Vol.31, 2012
  33. 고현범, 휴대전화, 철학과 통화하다, 책세상, 2007
  34. 국립국어원제공 네이버 국어사전, 컨버전스
  35. 그레고리 베이트슨, 마음의 생태학, 박대식 역, 책세상, 1992
  36. 김관규, 컨버전스 미디어 환경에서 블로거의 발신행위와 공간 인식에 관한 연구, 사회과학연구 제17권 3호, 2010
  37. 김교헌, 친교관계에서 자기노출의 기능, 한국심리학회지 Vol.11 No.1, 1992
  38. 김동섭 조택연, 위치기반 SNS로서의 공간미디어 활용전략, 기초조형학연구 Vol.11 No.3, 2010
  39. 김영욱, 공간형태와 공간인식의 상호관련성 연구, 대한건축학회지 제16권 10호, 2000.10
  40. 김창성, 아고라와 포룸-도시구조와 정체-, 도시인문학연구 Vol.1 No.2, 2009
  41. 남기범, 컨버전스로 인한 공적공간과 사적공간의 경계 변화, 정보통신정책연구원, 2008
  42. 네이버 두산백과, 주체성
  43. 댄 애리얼리, 거짓말하는 착한 사람들, 이경식 역, 청림출판, 2012
  44. 류현성, IT 신화는 계속된다, 휴먼비즈니스, 2008.10
  45. 리치 링, 모바일 미디어와 새로운 인간관계 네트워크의 출현, 배진한 역, 커뮤니케이션북스, 2009
  46. 박성복, 온라인 공간에서의 자기노출, 친밀감, 공동 공간감에 대한 연구, 한국언론학보 Vol.51 No.6, 2007.12
  47. 손승광, 집합주거 외부공간에서의 친밀성에 관한 연구, 대한건축학회논문집 제5권 5호, 1989.10
  48. 시사상식사전, PMG 지식엔진연구소, 2012
  49. 오태원 유지연, 소셜 네트워크 서비스 환경에서 프라이버시의 개념 변화, 방송통신정책 제23권 4호, 2011
  50. 윤영민, Dialogue 소셜미디어와 집단지성 1, 한양대학교출판부, 2011
  51. 이은기, 르네상스 광장과 미술, 그리고 정치이념, 미술사학 Vol.13, 1999
  52. 이찬훈, 현대 사회 구조와 주체성, 대동철학회논문집 Vol.5, 1999
  53. 이호규, 디지털 컨버전스의 커뮤니케이션 이론적 의미와 문화적 특성, 정보통신정책연구원, 2010
  54. 임석진 외 편저, 철학사전, 중원문화, 2009
  55. 전중환, 자연의 미와 진화심리학, 인문학연구 Vol.19, 2011
  56. 정건희, 전 군산청소년 수련원 부원장 인터뷰
  57. 제인 맥고니걸, 누구나 게임을 한다, 김고명 역, RHK, 2012
  58. 지상현, 시각예술과 디자인의 심리학, 민음사, 2002
  59. 홍성미, 거리공연에 대한 무용전공자들의 인식 및 실태조사 연구 : 10代에서 30代까지, 중앙대학교 석사학위논문, 2006
  60. 황우성 유지연, 모바일 커뮤니케이션으로 인한 도시 공적공간의 변화, 공간과 사회 통권 24호, 2005
  61. 리치 링, 모바일 미디어와 새로운 인간관계 네트워크의 출현, 배진한 역, 커뮤니케이션북스, 2009