DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Practical Factors Controlling in vitro Multiplication and Rooting in Empetrum nigrum var. japonicum, an Endangered Woody Species

  • Park, So-Young (Department of Horticultural Science, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Yong-Wook (Division of Forest Biotechnology, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Moon, Heung-Kyu (Division of Forest Biotechnology, Korea Forest Research Institute)
  • Received : 2012.10.10
  • Accepted : 2012.12.14
  • Published : 2012.12.31

Abstract

The plant Empetrum nigrum, valued in the traditional system of medicine, is well known for its antibacterial, antifungal, and antioxidant properties. In the present work, the effect of removal of shoot apical meristem (SAM) on shoot proliferation was studied. It was observed that removal of SAM promoted shoot proliferation whereas intact tip resulted in higher survival percentage. Further, the effect of different concentrations of BA on above was also studied. During root formation the effect of light quality after treatment with IBA was investigated. For rooting, continuous red light without IBA resulted in maximum rooting percentage. The above factors when taken into consideration during micropropagation of this endangered plant can result in healthier plantlets. The results show that the species could be successfully conserved by in vitro propagation system.

Keywords

References

  1. Appelgren, M. 1991. Effects of light quality on stem elongation of Pelargonium in vitro. Scientia Hort. 45:345-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(91)90081-9
  2. Aksenova, N.P., T.N. Konstantinova, L.I. Sergeeva, I. Machackova and S.A. Golyanovskaya. 1994. Morphogenesis of potato plants in vitro. I. Effect of light quality and hormones. J. Plant Growth Regul. 13:143-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00196378
  3. Barton, M.K. and R. S. Poethig. 1993. Formation of the shoot apical meristem in Arabidopsis thaliana: an analysis of development in the wild type and in the shoot meristemless mutant. Development 119:823-83.
  4. Economou, A.S. and P.E. Read. 1987. Light treatments to improve efficiency of in vitro propagation systems. Hort. Sci. 22:751-754.
  5. Estelle, M. and H.J. Klee. 1994. Auxin and cytokinin in Arabidopsis. In Meyeowitz E.M. and C.R. Somerville (eds.), Arabidopsis, Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, USA. pp. 555-578.
  6. Fankhauser, C. and J. Chory. 1997. Light control of plant development. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 13:203-229. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.13.1.203
  7. Han, M.S., S.Y. Park, H.K. Moon and Y.J. Kang. 2010. Micropropagation of a rare tree species, Empetrum nigrum var. japonicum K. Koch via axillary bud culture. Jour. Korean For. Soc. 99:568-572.
  8. Hobbie, L.J. 1998. Auxin: molecular genetic approaches in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 36:91-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0981-9428(98)80094-6
  9. Kahkonen, M.P., A.I. Hopia, H.J. Vuorela, J.P. Rauha, K. Pihlaja, T.S. Kujala and M. Heinonen. 1999. Antioxidant activity of plant extracts containing phenolic compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 47:3954-3962. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf990146l
  10. Kim, K.C., I.K. Lee, K.A. Kang, B.J. Kim, D. Kim, J.Y. Moon, B.S. Yoo and J.W. Hyun. 2011. Empetrum nigrum var. japonicum extract suppresses γ-ray radiation-induced cell damage via inhibition of oxidative stress. Am. J. Chin. Med. 39:161-170. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0192415X11008725
  11. Kim, K.C., K.A. Kang, R. Zhang, M.J. Piao, Y.J. Heo, S. Chae, G.Y. Kim, J.Y. Moon, B.S. Yoo and J.W. Hyun. 2009. Risk reduction of ethyl acetate fraction of Empetrum nigrum var. japonicum via antioxidant properties against hydrogen peroxide-induced cell damage. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health. 72:1499-1508. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287390903213178
  12. Krasnov, E.A., E.V. Ermilova, T.V. Kadyrova, V.A. Raldugin, I. Yu. Bagryanskaya, Yu. V. Gatilov, A.G. Druganov, A.A. Semenov and G.A. Tolstikov. 2000. Phenolic components of Empetrum nigrum extract and the crystal structure of one of them. Chem. Nat. Comp. 36:493-496. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002887406817
  13. Lloyd, G. and B. McCown. 1981. Commercially-feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel, Kalmia latifolia, by use of shoot tip culture. Proc. Int. Plant Propagators Soc. 30:421-427.
  14. Malamy, J.E. and P.N. Benfey. 1997. Organization and cell differentiation in lateral roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 124:33-44.
  15. McCutcheon, A.R., S.M. Ellis, R.E.W. Hancock and G.H.N. Towers. 1994. Antifungal screening of medicinal plants of British Columbian native people. J. Ethnopharmacology. 44:157-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8741(94)01183-4
  16. Miyashita, Y., T. Kimura, Y. Kitaya and T. Kozai. 1995. Effects of red light on growth and morphology of potato plantlets in vitro: Using LEDs as light source for micropropagation. Acta Hort. 418:169-173.
  17. Nakazawa, M., N. Yabe, T. Ichikawa, Y.Y. Yamamoto, T. Yoshizumi, K. Hasunuma and M. Matsui. 2001. DFL1, an auxin-responsive GH3 gene homologue, negatively regulates shoot cell elongation and lateral root formation, and positively regulates the light response of hypocotyls length. Plant J. 25:213-221. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.00957.x
  18. Neff, M.M., S.M. Nguyen and E.J Malancharuvil. 1999. BAS1: a gene regulating brassinosteroid levels and light responsiveness in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:15316-15323. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.26.15316
  19. Potten, C.S. and M. Loeffler. 1990. Stem cells: attributes, cycles, spirals, pitfalls and uncertainties. Lessons for and from the crypt. Development 110:1001-1020.
  20. Reddy, G.V., M.G. Heisler, D.W. Ehrhardt and E.M. Meyerowitz. 2004. Real-time lineage analysis reveals oriented cell divisions associated with morphogenesis at the shoot apex of Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 131:4225-4237. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.01261
  21. Steindler, C., A. Matteucci, G. Sessa, T. Weimar, M. Ohgishi, T. Aoyama, G. Morelli and I. Ruberti. 1999. Shade avoidance responses are mediated by the ATHB-2 HD-Zip protein, a negative regulator of gene expression. Development 126:4235-4245.
  22. Sussex, I. M. 1952. Regeneration of the potato shoot apex. Nature 170:224-225.
  23. Taiz, L. and E. Zeiger.1991. Plant Physiology. 1st ed. Benjamin/ Cummings Publ. Co. New York, USA. pp. 179-264.
  24. von Arnim, A. and X.W. Deng. 1996. Light control of seeding development. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 47:215-243. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.47.1.215