References
- Bird JM, Owen RG, D'Sa S, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma 2011. Br J Haematol 2011;154:32-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08573.x
- Terpos E, Moulopoulos LA, Dimopoulos MA. Advances in imaging and the management of myeloma bone disease. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:1907-1915. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.32.5449
- Schmidt GP, Reiser MF, Baur-Melnyk A. Whole-body MRI for the staging and follow-up of patients with metastasis. Eur J Radiol 2009;70:393-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.03.045
- Hoh CK. Clinical use of FDG PET. Nucl Med Biol 2007;34: 737-742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2007.07.001
- Haznedar R, Akı SZ, Akdemir OU, et al. Value of 18Ffluorodeoxyglucose uptake in positron emission tomography/ computed tomography in predicting survival in multiple myeloma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2011;38:1046-1053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-011-1738-8
- Mulligan ME, Badros AZ. PET/CT and MR imaging in myeloma. Skeletal Radiol 2007;36:5-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-006-0184-3
- Zamagni E, Patriarca F, Nanni C, et al. Prognostic relevance of 18-F FDG PET/CT in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with up-front autologous transplantation. Blood 2011;118:5989-5995. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-06-361386
- Libshitz HI, Malthouse SR, Cunningham D, MacVicar AD, Husband JE. Multiple myeloma: appearance at MR imaging. Radiology 1992;182:833-837. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.182.3.1535904
- Moulopoulos LA, Varma DG, Dimopoulos MA, et al. Multiple myeloma: spinal MR imaging in patients with untreated newly diagnosed disease. Radiology 1992;185: 833-840. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.185.3.1438772
- Stabler A, Baur A, Bartl R, Munker R, Lamerz R, Reiser MF. Contrast enhancement and quantitative signal analysis in MR imaging of multiple myeloma: assessment of focal and diffuse growth patterns in marrow correlated with biopsies and survival rates. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167:1029-1036. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.167.4.8819407
- Vande Berg BC, Lecouvet FE, Michaux L, Ferrant A, Maldague B, Malghem J. Magnetic resonance imaging of the bone marrow in hematological malignancies. Eur Radiol 1998;8:1335-1344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300050548
- Dimopoulos M, Terpos E, Comenzo RL, et al. International myeloma working group consensus statement and guidelines regarding the current role of imaging techniques in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple Myeloma. Leukemia 2009;23:1545-1556. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2009.89
- Wang K, Allen L, Fung E, Chan CC, Chan JC, Griffith JF. Bone scintigraphy in common tumors with osteolytic components. Clin Nucl Med 2005;30:655-671. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rlu.0000178027.20780.95
- Shortt CP, Carty F, Murray JG. The role of whole-body imaging in the diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of multiple myeloma. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2010;14:37-46. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1248705
- D'Sa S, Abildgaard N, Tighe J, Shaw P, Hall-Craggs M. Guidelines for the use of imaging in the management of myeloma. Br J Haematol 2007;137:49-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06491.x
- Lutje S, de Rooy JW, Croockewit S, Koedam E, Oyen WJ, Raymakers RA. Role of radiography, MRI and FDG-PET/CT in diagnosing, staging and therapeutical evaluation of patients with multiple myeloma. Ann Hematol 2009;88: 1161-1168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-009-0829-0
- Castellani M, Carletto M, Baldini L, et al. The prognostic value of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose bone marrow uptake in patients with recent diagnosis of multiple myeloma: a comparative study with Tc-99m sestamibi. Clin Nucl Med 2010;35:1-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0b013e3181c3619c
- Schirrmeister H, Bommer M, Buck AK, et al. Initial results in the assessment of multiple myeloma using 18F-FDG PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002;29:361-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-001-0711-3
- Sager S, Ergül N, Ciftci H, Cetin G, Güner SI, Cermik TF. The value of FDG PET/CT in the initial staging and bone marrow involvement of patients with multiple myeloma. Skeletal Radiol 2011;40:843-847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-010-1088-9
- Hillner BE, Siegel BA, Shields AF, et al. Relationship between cancer type and impact of PET and PET/CT on intended management: findings of the national oncologic PET registry. J Nucl Med 2008;49:1928-1935. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.056713
Cited by
- Clinical Application of18F-FDG-PET/CT in Multiple Myeloma vol.82, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3904/kjm.2012.82.6.686