Korean Journal of Radiology

The Korean Society of Radiology (대한영상의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Radiology Residents' Awareness about Ionizing Radiation Doses in Imaging Studies Their Cancer Risk during Radiological Examinations

  • Gokce, Senem Divrik (Ilkadim Community Health Center, Health Directorate) ;
  • Gokce, Erkan (Radiology Department, Samsun Maternity and Women's Disease and Pediatrics Hospital) ;
  • Coskun, Melek (Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University)
  • Published : 2012.04.01
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: Imaging methods that use ionizing radiation have been more frequent in various medical fields with advances in imaging technology. The aim of our study was to make residents be aware of the radiation dose they are subjected to when they conduct radiological imaging methods, and of cancer risk. Materials and Methods: A total of 364 residents participated in this descriptive study which was conducted during the period between October, 2008 and January, 2009. The questionnaires were completed under strict control on a one-to-one basis from each department. A $X^{2}$-test was used for the evaluation of data obtained. Results: Only 7% of residents correctly answered to the question about the ionizing radiation dose of a posteroanterior (PA) chest X-ray. The question asking about the equivalent number of PA chest X-rays to the ionizing dose of a brain CT was answered correctly by 24% of residents; the same question regarding abdominal CT was answered correctly by 16% of residents, thorax CT by 16%, thyroid scintigraphy by 15%, intravenous pyelography by 9%, and lumbar spine radiography by 2%. The risk of developing a cancer throughout lifetime by a brain and abdominal CT were 33% and 28%, respectively. Conclusion: Radiologic residents should have updated knowledge about radiation dose content and attendant cancer risks of various radiological imaging methods during both basic medical training period and following practice period.

Keywords

References

  1. Tuncel E. Klinik Radyoloji. Genisletilmis 2. Baskı. Nobel&Gunes Tıp Kitabevleri. 2008;3-105
  2. Nickoloff LE, Alderson PO. Radiation Exposures to Patients from CT: Reality, Public Perception, and Policy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:285-287 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.177.2.1770285
  3. UNSCEAR 2000. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly. New York: United Nations, 2000
  4. Brody AS, Frush DP, Huda Walter, Brent RL and Section on Radiology. Radiation risk to children from computed tomography. Pediatrics 2007;120:677-682 https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-1910
  5. Flohr TG, Schaller S, Stierstorfer K, Bruder H, Ohnesorge BM, Schoepf UJ. Multi-Detector Row CT Systems and Image- Reconstruction Techniques. Radiology 2005;235:756-773 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2353040037
  6. Donnelly LF. Reducing Radiation Dose Associated with Pediatric CT by Decreasing Unnecessary Examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:655-657 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.184.2.01840655
  7. Frush PD. Review of Radiation Issues for Computed Tomography. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI 2004;251:17- 24
  8. Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon WE. Estimated risks of radiation-ınduced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:289-296 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760289
  9. Hall EJ, Brenner DJ. Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Br J Radiol 2008;81:362-378 https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/01948454
  10. Jacob K, Vivian G, Steel JR. X- ray dose training: are we exposed to enought? Clin Radiol 2004;59:928-934 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2004.04.020
  11. Heyer CM, Peters S, Lemburg S, Nicholas V. Awareness of radiation exposure of thoracic CT scans and conventional radiographs: what do non-radiologists know? Rofo 2007;179:261-267 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-927366
  12. Shiralkar S, Rennie A, Snow M, Galland RB, Lewis MH, Gower-Thomas K. Doctors' knowledge of radiation exposure: questionnaire study. BMJ 2003;327:371-372 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7411.371
  13. Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP, Brink JA, Forman HP. Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awereness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology 2004;231:393-398 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2312030767
  14. Arslanoglu A, Bilgin S, Kubalı Z, Ceyhan MN, Ilhan MN, Maral I. Doctors' and intern doctors' knowledge about patients' ionizing radiation exposure doses during common radiological examinations. Diagn Interv Radiol 2007;13:53-55
  15. Gumus C, Cankorkmaz L, Erkoc MF, Oztoprak B, Atalar M, Koyluoglu G. Turkish pediatric surgeons knowledge on the radiation exposure of patients during diagnostic imaging. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2008;28:623-627
  16. Rice HE, Frush DP, Harker MJ, Farmer D, Waldhausen JH. Peer assessment of pediatric surgeons for potential risks of radiation exposure from computed tomography scans. J Pediatr Surg 2007;42:1157-1164 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.02.007
  17. Soye JA, Paterson A. A survey of radiation dose among healt profesionals in Northern Ireland. Br J Radiol 2008;81:725-729 https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/94101717
  18. Quinn AD, Taylor CG, Sabharwal T, Sikdar T. Radiation protection awareness in non-radiologists. Br J Radiol 1997;70:102-106 https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.70.829.9059306
  19. European Commission. Radiation Protection 118 Update Mars 2008 Referral Guidelines For Images. Final Report to the European Commission for Grant Agreement SUBV99/134996; Luxembourg 2007
  20. National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB) Radiological Protection Bulletin No: 231. Sept 2001 Chilton, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0RQ: 2001
  21. Diederich S, Lenzen H. Radiation exposure associated with imaging of the chest: comparison of different radiographic and computed tomography techniques. Cancer 2000;89:2457- 2460 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11+<2457::AID-CNCR22>3.0.CO;2-7
  22. Fazel R, Krumholz HM, Wang Y, Ross JS, Chen J, Ting HH, et al. Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N Engl J Med 2009;361:849-857 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0901249
  23. Slovis TL. The ALARA Concept in Pediatric CT: Myth or Reality? Radiology 2002;223:5-6 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2231012100
  24. Cascade PN, Webster EW, Kazerooni EA. Ineffective Use of Radiology: The Hidden Cost. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:561-564 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.170.3.9490931
  25. Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J, Butler PF, Callahan MJ, Coley BD, et al. The 'Image Genty' campaign: increasing CT radiation dose awarenes throught a national education and awareness program. Pediatr Radiol 2008;38:265-269 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-007-0743-3
  26. Huda W, Vance A. Patient radiation doses from adult and pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:540-546 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.0101
  27. Lee CI, Flaster HV, Haims AH, Monico EP, Forman HP. Diagnostic CT Scans: Institutional Informed Consent Guidelines and Practices at Academic Medical Centers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:282-287 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.0813
  28. De Jong PA, Mayo JR, Golmohammadi K, Nakano Y, Lequin MH, Tiddens HA, et al. Estimation of Cancer Mortality Associated with Repetitive Computed Tomography Scanning. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;173:199-203 https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200505-810OC
  29. Rogers LF. Radiation Exposure in CT: Why So High? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:277 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.177.2.1770277
  30. Brenner DJ. Radiation Risks Potentially Associated with Low-Dose CT Screening of Adult Smokers for Lung Cancer. Radiology 2004;231:440-445 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2312030880
  31. Rice HE, Frush DP, Farmer D, Wadhausen JH. Review of radiation risks from computed tomography: essentials for the pediatric surgeon. J Pediatr Surg 2007;42:603-607 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.12.009
  32. Frush DP, Donnely LF, Rosen NS. Computed tomography and radiation risks: What pediatric health care providers should know. Pediatrics 2003;112:951-957 https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.112.4.951
  33. Sadetzki S. Excess lifetime cancer mortality risk attributed to radiation exposure from pediatric computed tomography scan. IMAJ 2007;9:607-609
  34. Linton OW, Mettler FA. National conference on dose reduction in CT, with an emphasis on pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;81:21-329
  35. Petterson HB, Falth-Magnusson K, Persliden J, Scott M. Radiation risk and cost-benefit analysis of a paediatric radiology procedure: results from a national study. Br J Radiol 2005;78:34-38 https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/79694026
  36. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Hamberg LM, Blake MA, Shepard JA, et al. Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 2004;230:619-628 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2303021726
  37. Prasad SR, Wittram C, Shepard JA, McLoud T, Rhea J. Standard- dose and 50%-reduced-dose chest CT: Comparing the effect on image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:461-465 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.179.2.1790461
  38. Livingstone RS, Eapen A, Dip NB, Hubert N. Achieving reduced radiation doses for CT examination of the brain using optimal exposure parameters Ind J Radiol Imaj 2006;16:247-251 https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.29102
  39. Park EA, Lee W, Kang JH, Yin YH, Chung JW, Park JH. The image quality and radiation dose of 100-kVp versus 120-kVp ECG-gated 16 slice CT coronary angiography. Korean J Radiol 2009;10:235-243 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2009.10.3.235
  40. Qi W, Li J, Du X. Method for automatic tube current selection for obtaining a consistent image quality and dose optimization in a cardiac multidetector CT. Korean J Radiol 2009;10:568-574 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2009.10.6.568
  41. FDA Public Health Notification: Reducing radiation risk from computed tomography for pediatric and small adult patients. Pediatr Radiol 2002;32:314-316 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-002-0687-6

Cited by

  1. Little impact of tsunami-stricken nuclear accident on awareness of radiation dose of cardiac computed tomography: A questionnaire study vol.6, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-170
  2. Optimizing the Balance Between Radiation Dose and Image Quality in Pediatric Head CT: Findings Before and After Intensive Radiologic Staff Training vol.202, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.13.11741
  3. Multidetector Computed Tomography for the Assessment of Adnexal Mass: Is Unenhanced CT Scan Necessary? vol.15, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2014.15.1.72
  4. Referring Physicians’ Knowledge on Justification of Medical Exposure in Diagnostic Imaging in a Sub-Saharan African Country, Cameroon vol.4, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4236/ojrad.2014.41008
  5. Societal and Individual Determinants of Patients' Radiation Safety Behavior: A Preliminary Investigation from China vol.11, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2013.10.019
  6. Evaluation of non-radiologist physicians' knowledge on aspects related to ionizing radiation in imaging vol.47, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2013.1840
  7. Physicians' Perceptions of Radiation Dose Quantity Depend on the Language in Which It Is Expressed vol.13, pp.8, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2016.03.026
  8. Are physicians aware enough of patient radiation protection? Results from a survey among physicians of Pavia District– Italy vol.17, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2358-1
  9. Awareness of radiation risks from CT scans among patients and providers and obstacles for informed decision-making vol.25, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-017-1557-8
  10. Radiation Safety in Emergency Medicine: Balancing the Benefits and Risks vol.20, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.0416
  11. Analysis of Computed Tomography Radiation Doses Used for Lung Cancer Screening Scans vol.179, pp.12, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.3893