References
- Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements.1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod 1971; 60 :111-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(71)90028-5
- Zamora N, Llamas JM, Cibrian R, Gandia JL, Paredes V. Cephalometric measurements from 3D reconstructed images compared with conventional 2D images. Angle Orthod 2011; 81 : 856-64. https://doi.org/10.2319/121210-717.1
- Oz U, Orhan K, Abe N. Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40 : 492-500. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/15644321
- Kumar V, Ludlow J, Soares Cevidanes LH, Mol A. In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Angle Orthod 2008; 78 : 873-9. https://doi.org/10.2319/082907-399.1
- Broadbent BH. A new x-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1931; 1 : 45-66.
- Rousset MM, Simonek F, Dubus JP. A method for correction of radiographic errors in serial three-dimensional cephalometry. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003; 32 : 50-9. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/51868734
- Farman AG, Scarfe WC. Development of imaging selection criteria and procedures should precede cephalometric assessment with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130 : 257-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.021
- Cattaneo PM, Bloch CB, Calmar D, Hjortshoj M, Melsen B. Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134 : 798-802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.07.008
- Gribel BF, Gribel MN, Manzi FR, Brooks SL, McNamara JA Jr. From 2D to 3D: an algorithm to derive normal values for 3-dimensional computerized assessment. Angle Orthod 2011;81 : 3-10. https://doi.org/10.2319/032910-173.1
- Kwon TG, Park HS, Ryoo HM, Lee SH. A comparison of craniofacial morphology in patients with and without facial asymmetry - a three-dimensional analysis with computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 35 : 43-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2005.04.006
- Cevidanes LH, Bailey LJ, Tucker SF, Styner MA, Mol A, Phillips CL, et al. Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography for assessment of mandibular changes after orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131 : 44-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.03.029
Cited by
- Comparison of linear measurements between CBCT orthogonally synthesized cephalograms and conventional cephalograms. vol.43, pp.7, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140024
- Vertical bone measurements from cone beam computed tomography images using different software packages vol.29, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2015.vol29.0035
- Accuracy of 3D cephalometric measurements based on an automatic knowledge-based landmark detection algorithm vol.11, pp.7, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1334-7
- Genetic determinants and postorthodontic external apical root resorption in Czech children vol.23, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.12564
- Mandibular ramus thickness based on cone beam computed tomography scan vol.1073, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1073/2/022004
- Evaluation of skeletal changes in mandibular ramus height, corpus length, and mandibular angle changes following twin block appliance therapy using cone-beam computed tomography: A clinical prospectiv vol.12, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4103/ijor.ijor_3_21
- Polymorphisms of Encoding Genes IL1RN and P2RX7 in Apical Root Resorption in Patients after Orthodontic Treatment vol.22, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22020777
- Automatic Cephalometric Landmark Identification System Based on the Multi-Stage Convolutional Neural Networks with CBCT Combination Images vol.21, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3390/s21020505