References
- Cohen S, Hargreaves KM. Pathways of the pulp. 9th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Inc; 2006. p305.
- Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 1974;18:269-296.
- Garip Y, Gunday M. The use of computed tomography when comparing nickel-titanium and stainless steel files during preparation of simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 2001;34:452-457.
- Walia HM, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod 1988;14:346-351.
- Thomson SA, Dummer PM. Shaping ability of Profile .04 taper series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part1. Int Endod J 1997;30:1-7.
- Wu MK, Wesselilnk PR. Efficacy of three techniques in cleaning the apical portion of curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995; 79:492-496.
- Zmener O, Banegas G. Comparison of three instrumentation technique in the preparation of simulated curved root canals. Int Endod J 1996;29:315-319.
- Thompson SA. An overview of nickel-titanium alloys used in dentistry. Int Endod J 2000;33:297-310.
- Cheung GS, Liu CS. A retrospective study of endodontic treatment outcome between nickel-titanium rotary and stainless steel hand filing techniques. J Endod 2009;35:938-943.
- Kazemi RB, Stenman E, Spangberg LS. A comparison of stainless steel and nickel titanium H-type instruments of identical design: torsional and bending tests. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;90:500-506.
- Roane JB, Sabala CL, Duncanson MG Jr. The "balanced force" concept for instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod 1985;11:203-211.
- Southard DW, Oswald RJ, Natkin E. Instrumentation of curved molar root canals with the Roane technique. J Endod 1987;13:479-489.
- Yared G. Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations. Int Endod J 2007;41:339-344.
- Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod 2004;30:559-567.
- Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparation in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Radiol 1971;32:271-275.
- Schafer E, Tepel J, Hoppe W. Properties of endodontic hand instruments used in rotary motion. Part2. Instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod 1995;21:493-497.
- Schäfer E, Vlassis M. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 2004;37:229-238.
- Kum KY, Spängberg L, Cha BY, Jung IY, Lee SJ, Lee CY. Shaping ability of three Profile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals. J Endod 2000;26:719-723.
- Ahmad M. The Validity of using simulated root canals models for ultrasonic instrumentation. J Endod 1989; 15:544-547.
- Alodeh MH, Dummer PM. A comparison of the ability of K-files and Hedstrom files to shape simulated root canals in resin blocks. Int Endod J 1989;22:226-235.
- Calberson FL, Deroose CA, Hommez GM, De Moor RJ. Shaping ability of ProTaper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin root canals. Int Endod J 2004;37:613-623.
- Paque F, Musch U, Hulsmann M. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Int Endod J 2005;38:8-16.
- Ku JH, Chang HS, Chang SW, Cho HH, Bae JM, Min KS. The instrument-centering ability of four Nickel-Titanium instruments in simulated curved root canals. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2006;31:113-118.
- Schäfer E, Dammaschke T. Development and sequelae of canal transportation. Endod Top 2006;15:75-90.
- Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL Jr. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 1997;23:77-85.
- Weine FS. Endodontic therapy. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby Inc; 1982. p256-340.
- Cunningham CJ, Senia ES. A three-dimensional study of canal curvatures in the mesial roots of mandibular molars. J Endod 1992;18:294-300.
- ElDeeb ME, Boraas JC. The effect of different files on the preparation shape of severely curved canals. Int Endod J 1985;18:1-7.
- You SY, Bae KS, Baek SH, Kum KY, Shon WJ, Lee W. Lifespan of one nickel-titanium rotary file with reciprocating motion in curved root canals. J Endod 2010;36:1991-1994.
- You SY, Kim HC, Bae KS, Baek SH, Kum KY, Lee W. Shaping ability of reciprocating motion in curved root canals: a comparative study with micro-computed tomography. J Endod 2011;37:1296-1300.
- Shen Y, Cheung GS, Bian Z, Peng B. Comparison of defects in ProFile and ProTaper systems after clinical use. J Endod 2006;32:61-65.
- Johnson E, Lloyd A, Kuttler S, Namerow K. Comparison between a novel nickel-titanium alloy and 508 nitinol on the cyclic fatigue life of Profile 25/.04 rotary instruments. J Endod 2008;34:1406-1409.
Cited by
- Shaping characteristics of two different motions nickel titanium file: a preliminary comparative study of surface profile and dentin chip vol.30, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2014.30.2.121
- Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of WaveOne, Reciproc and OneShape single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth vol.48, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12289
- Does the Reciproc file remove root canal bacteria and endotoxins as effectively as multifile rotary systems? vol.48, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12346
- The impact of clinical use on the torsional behavior of Reciproc and WaveOne instruments vol.24, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720150596
- A comparison of the shaping ability of three nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomography study via a contrast radiopaque technique in vitro vol.17, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-016-0326-5
- Endodontic treatment of mandibular molar with root dilaceration using Reciproc single-file system vol.38, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.3.167
- Influence of operator's experience level on lifespan of the WaveOne Primary file in extracted teeth vol.38, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.4.222
- Effect of passive ultrasonic agitation during final irrigation on cleaning capacity of hybrid instrumentation vol.39, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2014.39.2.104
- Comparison of canal transportation in simulated curved canals prepared with ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Gold systems vol.41, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.1.1
- Root canal volume change and transportation by Vortex Blue, ProTaper Next, and ProTaper Universal in curved root canals vol.43, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2018.43.e3
- A new methodology for the measurement of the root canal curvature and its 3D modification after instrumentation vol.76, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2018.1440321
- Shaping ability of protaper next compared with waveone in late-model three-dimensional printed teeth vol.18, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0573-8
- Shaping ability of ProTaper Universal, WaveOne and ProTaper Next in simulated L-shaped and S-shaped root canals vol.15, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-015-0012-z
- Shaping Ability of Reciproc, UnicOne, and Protaper Universal in Simulated Root Canals vol.2015, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/690854
- Current Assessment of Reciprocation in Endodontic Preparation: A Comprehensive Review-Part II: Properties and Effectiveness vol.41, pp.12, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.08.018
- Transportation assessment in artificial curved canals after instrumentation with Reciproc, Reciproc Blue, and XP ‐endo Shaper Systems vol.10, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12417
- Canal transportation and centering ability of root canals prepared using rotary and reciprocating systems with and without PathFiles in cone-beam computed tomography-based three-dimensional molar prot vol.24, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_200_21
- Evaluation of Curved Canal Transportation Using the Neoniti Rotary System with Reciprocal Motion: A Comparative Study vol.2021, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4877619