DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

습열증(濕熱證)에서 막원(膜原)의 중요성(重要性)에 대한 고찰(考察) - "습열조변(濕熱條辨)"을 중심으로 -

A Study on the importance of makwon(膜原) in seupyeoljeung(濕熱證) - Based on the Seupyeoljobyeon(濕熱條辨) -

  • 김상현 (경희대학교 한의과대학 원전학교실) ;
  • 백유상 (경희대학교 한의과대학 원전학교실) ;
  • 정창현 (경희대학교 한의과대학 원전학교실) ;
  • 장우창 (경희대학교 한의과대학 원전학교실)
  • Kim, Sang-Hyun (Dept. of Oriental Medical Classics, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyunghee University) ;
  • Baik, You-Sang (Dept. of Oriental Medical Classics, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyunghee University) ;
  • Jeong, Chang-Hyun (Dept. of Oriental Medical Classics, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyunghee University) ;
  • Jang, Woo-Chang (Dept. of Oriental Medical Classics, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyunghee University)
  • 투고 : 2012.07.26
  • 심사 : 2012.11.16
  • 발행 : 2012.11.25

초록

The concept of makwon(膜原) holds great importance in the texts of Seup-yeoljobyeon(濕熱條辨). Research on the concept was based on Seolsaengbaek(薛生白)'s medical theories organized by Wang Maengyeong(王孟英). The results are as follows. Seolsaengbaek describes makwon as half-exterior half-interior(半表半裏) of yang-myeong(陽明) and half-exterior half-interior of the body. The half-exterior half-interior in these definitions each hold a different meaning. In half-exterior half-interior of yang-myeong, it refers to its mediating function, focusing on the location of makwon as yang-myeong. In half-exterior half-interior of the body, it refers to an intersection where the pathological mechanism of damp-heat disease(seup-yeoljeung 濕熱證) begins, and also where the course of the disease changes. This is why treatment of the makwon is included in treating many damp-heat disease symptoms. The conditions derived from the original damp-heat disease can follow the designated prognosis, or follow a reversed course. Because of its intersecting role, treating the makwon can help prevent aggravation. In treatment, consideration of the healthygi(jeonggi 正氣), the bodily fluids(jinaek 津液) with an understanding of the various prognosis is crucial.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 박찬국. 온병학 발달에 관한 문헌적 연구. 경희대학교 대학원 박사학위논문. 1985. pp.37-41.
  2. 張之文. 濕熱病의 치료(1). 동양의학 1996. (63). p.52.
  3. 張之文. 濕熱病의 치료(2). 동양의학 1996. (64). p.48.
  4. 임태정. 설설의 습열병론에 관한 연구. 경원대학교 대학원 박사학위논문. 2005.
  5. 张志斌. 湿热论存世疑问的文献学研究. 山东中医药大学学报. 2006. (6).
  6. 张志斌. 王孟英所论湿热病篇辨疑. 浙江中医杂志. 2006. (11).
  7. 朱炳林. 薛生白治病究体质经验探讨. 江西中医药. 2004. (10).
  8. 苏云放. 论膜原的中介效应-从系统论的一个焦距揆度膜原. 中国中医基础医学杂志. 2003. 9(6).
  9. 苏云放. 少阳三焦膜原系统论. 中华中医药杂志. 2010. 25(4).
  10. 宋乃光. 膜原证与达原饮类方探讨. 北京中医药大学学报. 1998. 21(6).
  11. 苏云放. 非典的伏气温疫-膜塬说探讨. 浙江中医学院学报. 2003. 27(4).
  12. 高嘉骏. 內經膜原异文考辨. 中医药通报. 2005. (3). pp.21-23.
  13. 夏永良. 探析"膜原—三焦门户"说. 浙江中医杂志. 2003. (8). p.326.
  14. 王士雄 著. 溫熱經緯. 北京. 學苑出版社. 2004. p.102, 103, 106, 107, 108, 109, 111, 112, 113, 118.
  15. 吳有性 原著, 鄭重光 補注. 溫疫論補注. 北京. 人民衛生出版社. 1995. p.1, 3, 4, 9, 38.
  16. 王孟英 著, 白上龍 譯注. 國譯補注 溫熱經緯 下卷. 서울. 木과 土. 2001. pp.39-164.
  17. 洪元植 校合編纂. 精校黃帝內經素問. 서울. 東洋醫學硏究院 出版部. 1985. p.130, 145.
  18. 洪元植 校合編纂. 精校黃帝內經靈樞. 서울. 東洋醫學硏究院 出版部. 1985. p.286, 287.
  19. 金達鎬, 李鍾馨. 注解補注 黃帝內經素問(上). 서울. 의성당. 2001. p.754.
  20. 葉天士 著, 徐靈胎 評. 臨証指南醫案. 香港. 商務印書館. 1976. p.265, 321, 351, 358, 423.
  21. 葉天士 著, 魏汉奇, 袁宝庭 注評. 溫熱論注評. 北京. 中醫古籍出版社. 1993. p.38, 39.
  22. 吳鞠通 著, 丁彰炫 譯. 國譯 溫病條辨. 서울. 집문당. 2004. p.616.
  23. 兪根初 原著, 連建伟 訂校, 徐晓东 參訂. 三訂通俗傷寒論. 北京. 中醫古籍出版社. 2002. p.279.
  24. 趙立勛 編著. 濕熱條辨類解. 成都. 四川科學技術出版社. 1986. pp.190-242.
  25. 곽민영. 파이낸셜타임스 '한국 사스환자 없는 것은 김치속 마늘때문'. 동아사이언스. 2003 Mar 16; Available from: URL: http://news. dongascience.com/PHP/NewsView.php?kisaid=20030416200000000003&classcode=0103