DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

총채가시응애(Hypoaspis aculeifer)와 긴털가루응애(Tyrophagus putrescentiae)의 저온저장 조건 구명

Study on the Cold Storage Condition of Hypoaspis aculeifer(Canestrini)(Acari: Gamasida) and Tyrophagus putrescentiae(Schrank)(Acari: Acaridae)

  • 함은혜 (경북대학교 생태과학과) ;
  • 최영철 (국립농업과학원 곤충산업과) ;
  • 이준석 ((주)오상킨섹트 생물자원연구소) ;
  • 박종균 (경북대학교 생태과학과)
  • Ham, Eun Hye (Department of Ecology Science, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Choi, Young Cheol (Applied Entomology Division, National Academy of Agricultural Science) ;
  • Lee, Jun Seok (Institute for Bioresources research, Osangkinsect Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Park, Jong Kyun (Department of Ecology Science, Kyungpook National University)
  • 투고 : 2012.09.27
  • 심사 : 2012.10.12
  • 발행 : 2012.12.30

초록

성공적인 생물학적 방제를 위해서는 적용천적의 사육기준과 규격이 설정되어 있어야 한다. 8, $12^{\circ}C$, 습도 $70{\pm}5%$, 24시간 암조건에서 총채가시응애와 그 먹이응애인 긴털가루응애의 저온 저장 실험을 수행하였다. 긴털가루응애는 소맥피(50%)와 쌀겨(50%)로 조성된 먹이사료에 접종하여 $12^{\circ}C$에서 저온저장이 가능하였다. 긴털가루응애와 총채가시응애의 생존율이 70%되는 조건은 $12^{\circ}C$에서 28일, 70일 저장후이다. 총채가시응애를 $12^{\circ}C$에서 28, 56, 84일 저온 저장후 증식율을 확인한 결과 저온기간에 상관없이 유사한 결과를 나타내었다.

The success of biological control depends upon the standard setting and effective mass rearing of natural enemies. In this work, we have investigated cold storage condition of Hypoaspis aculeifer(Canestrini) and Tyrophagus putrescentiae(Schrank). which has been stored at 8, $12^{\circ}C$, RH $70{\pm}5%$, in dark condition. An appropriate temperature of cold storage was $12^{\circ}C$ with wheat bran(50%) and rice bran(50%) for T. putrescentiae. 7o% of T. putrescentiae and H. aculeifer could survive for 28 days and 70 days at $12^{\circ}C$. After storing at $12^{\circ}C$ with prey mite for 28 days, 56 days and 84 days, their reproduction rate showed similar resultes.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Axelsen JA, Holst N, Hamers T, Krogh PH(1997) Simulations of the predator-prey interactions in a two species ecotoxicological test system. Ecol Model 101, 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(97)01950-9
  2. Berndt O, Meyhöfer R, Poehling HM(2004) The edaphic phase in the ontogenesis of Frankliniella occidentalis and comparison of Hypoaspis miles and Hypoaspis aculeifer as predators of soil-dwelling thrips stages. Biol Control 30, 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2003.09.009
  3. British Crop Protection Council(BCPC)(2004) The manual of biocontrol agents. BCPC, 7 Omni Business Centre, Omega Park, Alton, Hampshire, GU34 2QD, UK. pp.702.
  4. Chambers RJ, Wright EM, Lind RJ(1993) Biological control of glasshouse sciarid larvae(Bradysia spp.) with the predatory mite, Hypoaspis miles on Cyclamen and Poinsettia. Biocontrol Sci Technol 3, 285-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583159309355283
  5. De Clercq P, Degheele D(1993) Cold storage of the predatory bugs Podisus maculiventris(Say) and Podisus sagitta(Fabricius)(Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Parasitica 49(1-2), 27-41.
  6. Gillespie DR, Ramey CA(1988) Life history and cold storage of Amblyseius cucumeris(Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Entomol Soc Brit Columbia 85, 71-76.
  7. IOBC. Quality control guidelines for natural enemies. www.entomology. wisc.edu/iobc/nrs.htm
  8. Kim JH, Kim HY, Han MJ, Choi MY, Hwang SJ, Lee MS(2009) Cold Storage Effect on the Biological Characteristics of Orius laevigatus(Fieber)(Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) and Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot(Acari: Phytoseiidae). Korean J Appl Entomol 48(3), 361-368. https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2009.48.3.361
  9. Morewood WD(1992) Cold storage of Phytoseiulus persimilis( Phytoseiidae). Exper Appl Acarol 13, 231-236. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01194939
  10. Rudolf E, Malausa JC, Millot P, Pralavorio R(1993) Influence of cold temperature on biological characteristics of Orius laevigatus and Orius majusculus(Het.: Anthocoridae). Entomothaga 38(3), 317-325. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02374448
  11. SAS Institue. 1996. "SAS 6.11 for Window" SAS Institue, Cary, NC, USA.
  12. Van Lenteren JC(2003) Quality Control and Production of Biological Control Agents(Theory and Testing Procedures). CABI Publishing. pp.327.

피인용 문헌

  1. Investigation of Korean Native Organisms for Development of Ecotoxicity Test : (2) Soil Test Species vol.40, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4491/KSEE.2018.40.1.48