DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Pap Smear Screening Results for Turkish Pregnant Women

  • Dinc, Ayten (School of Health Sciences, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University)
  • Published : 2012.11.30

Abstract

Objective: Cervix cancer is one of the most common gynecological cancer types that cause cancer deaths among women. This study was planned based on a descriptive method in order to evaluate the results of PAP smear screening during pregnancy for prevention of cancer. Materials and Methods: The research involved 110 pregnant women registered at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Polyclinic of Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital and 86 non-pregnant women of the same ages as a control group. As criteria for acceptance were conditions such as not being in coitus within the last 48 hours, not using vaginal ovule, and not performing vaginal lavage. A survey consisting of 33 questions was conducted and the results were processed using Bethesda. Results: The average ages were $27.1{\pm}4.70$ for the pregnant women and $28.8{\pm}4.24$ for the control group. 60.7% of cases had previously heard of a PAP smear test, 49% were aware of why PAP smear tests were conducted, 26.4% of pregnant participants and 27.3% of non-pregnant participants had previously undergone a smear test. In this study, smear results of all cases were 95.4% sufficient. 18.2% of pregnant cases had an infection, 54.5% had reactive cellular change, and 0.9% had atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US). 16.3% of non-pregnant cases had an infection, 58.1% had reactive cellular change, 3.5% had atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US), and 1.2% had low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LGSIL). Conclusion: PAP smear test is a good opportunity to identify pre-invasive lesions in early phases of pregnancy.

Keywords

References

  1. Ak M, Canbal M, Turan S, et al (2010). Aile hekimligi poliklinigine basvuran kadinlarda papsmear testinin farkindaliklarinin degerlendirilmesi. Konuralp Tip Dergisi, 2, 1-4.
  2. Aksu M (2008). Gebelikte Servikovaginal Sitolojik Degisikliklerin Degerlendirilmesi SB. Iistanbul Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi, Tipta Uzmanlik Tezi, Istanbul.
  3. Akyuz A, Guvenc G, Yavan T, et al (2006). Kadinlarin pap smear yaptirma durumlari ve bunu etkileyen faktorlerin belirlenmesi. Gulhane Tip Dergisi, 48, 25-9.
  4. American College of Obstetrican and Gynecologist, ACOG Practice bulletin (2003). servical ctyology screening. number 45, august 2003. Int J Gyneacol Obstet, 83, 237-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(03)00412-0
  5. Barghouti FF, Takruri AH, Froelicher ES (2008). Awareness and behavior about pap smear testing in family medicine practice. Saudi Med J, 29, 1036-40.
  6. Canfell K, Sitas F, Beral V (2006). Cervical cancer in Australia and the United Kingdom: comparison of screening policy and uptake, and cancer incidence and mortality. Med J Aust, 185, 482-6.
  7. Ertem G (2009). Awareness of cervical cancer risk factors and screening behaviour among nurses in a rural region of Turkey. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev, 10, 735-8.
  8. Fan L, Zou LY, Wu YM, et al (2010). Factors associated with abnormal cervical cytology in pregnant women. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi, 45, 109-13.
  9. Ferlay J, Bray F, Pisani P, et al (2004). GLOBOCAN 2002: Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide. IARC CancerBase No. 5. Version 2.0, IARC Press, Lyon.
  10. Khaengkhor P, Mairaing K, Suwannarurk K, et al (2011). Prevalence of abnormal cervical cytology by liquid based cytology in the antenatal care clinic. J Med Assoc Thai, 94, 152-8.
  11. Nguyen TT, McPhee SJ, Lam T, et al (2002). Predictors of cervical pap smear screening awareness, intention,and receipt among Vietnamese-American women. Am J Prev M, 23, 207-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00499-3
  12. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al (2005). Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin, 55, 74-108. https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74
  13. Pisharodi ve Jovanaska (1995). Spektrum of cytologic changes in pregnancy. Acta Cytol, 39, 905-8.
  14. Saglik Bakanligi Kanserle Savas Daire Baskanligi Genelgesi, 2009,: http://www.saglik.gov.tr/ (accessed March 2009).
  15. Saslow D, Runowicz CD, Solomon D, et al (2002). American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer. CA Cancer J Clin, 52, 342-62. https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.52.6.342
  16. Selleret Land Mathevet P (2008). Precancerous cervical lesions during pregnancy: diagnostic and treatment. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, 37, 131-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgyn.2007.11.018
  17. Siddiqui G, Kurzel RB, Lampley EC, et al (2001). Cervical dysplasia in pregnancy: propression versus regression postpartum. Int J fertil Womens Med, 46, 278-80.
  18. Smith EB, Creasman WT (1988). Preinvasive and invasive cervical neoplasia. Cancer, 186, 1132-7
  19. Strinic T, Bukovic D, Karelovic D, et al (2002). The effect of delivery on regression of abnormal cervical cytologic finding. Coll Antropol, 26, 577-82.
  20. Tessaro I, Herman C (2000). Changes in Public Health Nurses' knowledge and perception of counseling and clinical skills for breast and cervical cancer control. Cancer Nurs, 23, 401-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002820-200010000-00012
  21. Uluslararasi Kanser Arastirmalari Kurumu (2008), WHO 2008 Dunya Kanser Raporu, Edi. Peter Boyle ve Bernard Levin, Lyon.
  22. Vural E, Gonenc L, Aka N, et al (2004). Antenatal kontrollerde pap smear taramasi ve sonuclari. Turkiye Aile Hekimligi Dergisi, 8, 111-5.
  23. Yaren A, Ozkilic G, Guler A, et al (2008). Awareness of breast and cervical cancer risk factors and screening behaviours among nurses in rural region of Turkey. Eur J Cancer Care, 17, 278-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2354.2007.00856.x
  24. Yatli S, Altintepe G, Dayicioglu V (2003). Gebelerde servikal kanser taramasi. Zeynep Kamil Tip Bulteni, 34, 7-11. Zemheri E, Koyuncaer A (2005). Servikal kanserlerin erken tanisinda pap testinin onemi. Surekli Tip Egitimi Dergisi, 14, 2-3.

Cited by

  1. Prevalence and Pattern of Abnormal Pap Smear among Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Clinic in a Missionary Hospital in Abakaliki, Southeast Nigeria vol.08, pp.08, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2018.88077