DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Phosphorus Removal Effects Per Iron Surface Area in FNR Process

철전기분해장치(FNR)에서 철판의 표면적이 인제거에 미친 영향에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2012.10.29
  • Accepted : 2012.11.27
  • Published : 2012.12.31

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this experiment is to understand the phosphorus removal ratio effects of iron plates per unit of surface area through the iron electrolysis system, which consists of an anoxic basin, aerobic basin, and iron precipitation apparatus. Methods: Iron electrolysis, which uses an iron precipitation reactor in anoxic and oxic basins, consisted of iron plates with total areas of 400 $cm^2$, 300 $cm^2$ and 200 $cm^2$ respectively. The FNR process was operated with a hydraulic retention time and a sludge retention time of 12 hours and three days, respectively. Wastewater used in the experiments was prepared by dissolving $KH_2PO_4$ in influent water. Results: The iron plates 400 $cm^2$ (16.6 $mA/cm^2$), 300 $cm^2$ (13.3 $mA/cm^2$) and 200 $cm^2$ (7.3 $mA/cm^2$) in surface area in the phosphorus reactor had respective phosphorus of 2.4 mg/l, 2.7 mg/l and 3.2 mg/l in the effluent and phosphorus removal respective efficiencies of 90.3%, 89.1% and 87.1%. The effluent in the reactor, where the iron plate was not used, had relatively very low phosphorus removal efficiency showing phosphorus concentration of 15.3 mg/l and a phosphorus removal efficiency about 38.3%. Phosphorus removal per ferrous was 0.472 mgP/mgFe in the iron electrolysis system where the surface area of iron was low. Phosphorus pollution load per active surface area and the phosphorus removal efficiency had an interrelation of RE = -0.27LS + 89.0 (r = 0.85). Conclusion: With larger iron plate surface area, the elution of iron concentration and phosphorus removal efficiency was higher. The removal efficiency of phosphorus has decreased by increasing the initial phosphate concentration in the iron electrodes. This shows a tendency of decreasing phosphorus removal efficiency because of decreasing of iron deposition as the phosphorus pollution load per active surface area increases.

Keywords

References

  1. Wilderer PA, Arnz P, Arnold E. Application of biofilms and biofilm support ma-terials as a temporary sink and source. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2000; 123(1-4): 147-1580. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005237617334
  2. Lee DS, Jeon CO, Park JM. Biolobical nitrogen removal with enhanced pho-sphate uptake in a sequencing batch reactor using single sludge system. Wat. Res. 2001; 35(16): 3968-3976. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00132-4
  3. Kim YG, Kim IB. The nitrogen and phosphorus removal UNR process using sludge carbon source. Korean J. Environ Health. 2002; 28(1): 93-98.
  4. Joo Hyun Sim, Se Han Kang, Hyung Joon Seo, Su Sung Song. A study on the optimum operating conditions and effects of wastewater characteristics in electrochemical nitrogen removal process. J KSSE. 2009; 31: 29-35.
  5. Kim JS, Park SC. The removal of copper by granular iron bipolar packed bed cell. J KSSE. 2004; 26(11): 1267-1271.
  6. Sahset Irdemez, Nuhi Demircioglu, Yalc n Sevki Y ld z, Zuleyha Bingul, The effects of current density and phosphate concentration on phosphate removal from wastewater by electro coagulation using aluminum and iron plate electrodes. Separation and Purication Technology. 2006; 52: 218-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2006.04.008
  7. Choi ES., Lee HS, Park MG, Chang YS. Selection of nutrient removal process for low strength municipal wastewater, Proc. 5th IAWQ Asia Conference on Water Quality and Pollution Control; 1995. p. 382-397.
  8. Cheong JH, Heo YR, Jeong Dae, Eui Sin Lee, Myung Gyun Park, Nitrogen and Phosphorus removal in long term pilot operation using sibmerged hollow fiber membrane and ferric chloride. J KSSE. 2005; 27(11): 1168-1173.
  9. APHA, AWWA and WPCF: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 16th ed., Washington D.C., USA; 1985. p.92-100.
  10. Cho IH, Zoh KD, An SW, Chang SW, Kim YG. Characterization of phosphorus removal in wastewater using iron precipitation reactor. J Environmental Health Science. 2006; 32(1): 89-95. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.983
  11. James BR, Rabenhorst MC, Frogen GA. Phosphorus sorption by peat and sand amended with iron oxiders or steel wool. Water Environment Research. 1967; 64(5): 699-705.
  12. Gangol N, Thodos G. Phosphate adsorption studies. Water Environment Research. 1973; 45(5): 842- 849.
  13. Kavanaugh MC, Krejci V, Weber T, Eugster J, Roberts PV. Phosphorus removal by post-precipitation with Fe(III). Water Environment Research. 1978; 50: 216-233.
  14. Groterud O, Smoczynski L, Phosphorus removal from water by means of electrolysis. Water Research. 1986; 20(5): 667-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(86)90032-1
  15. Bard, AJ, Encyclopedia of electrochemistry of the elements. Vol. IX, part A, Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York: Basel; 1982. p.230-360.