References
- Al-Harethee W, Theodorpoulos G, Fillippakis GM, et al (2012). Complications of percutaneous stereotactic vacuum assisted breast biopsy system utilizing radio frequency. Eur J Radiol, Jan 9 [Epub ahead print].
- American College of Radiology, 4th edition, 2003
- A Van Steen1, R Van Tiggelen (2007). JBR-BTR, 90, 151-3.
- Cholatip W, Weeraya B, Bussanee W, (2010). Biopsy rate and positive predictive value for breast cancer in BI-RADS category 4 breast lesions. J Med Assoc Thai, 93, 830-7.
- Edward A S (1991). Periodic mammographic follow up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases. Pathology, 179, 463-8.
- Hamy AS, Giacchettti S, Abiter M, et al (2011). BI-RADS categorization of 2708 consecutive nonpalpable breast lesions in patients referred to a dedicated breast care unit. Eur Radiol, Jul 16 [Epub ahead of print].
- Harmine M Z, Emile G C, Joe H (1999). Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography. Radiology, 213, 413-22 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.213.2.r99nv05413
- Jacobs IA, Chevinsky AH, Diehl W, et al (2001). Advanced breast biopsy instrumentation (ABBI) and management of nonpalpable breast abnormalities: a community hospital Experience. Breast, 10, 421-6. https://doi.org/10.1054/brst.2000.0272
- Lazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, Koelliker SL, Livingston LS (2006). BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology, 239, 385-91. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2392042127
- Mark H, Debra I, Dorit A (1991). Localization and needle aspiration of breast lesions: complications in 370 cases. AJR, 10, 711-4.
- Mary B Barton, Debra S Morley, Sera Moore, et al (2004). J Natl Cancer Inst, 96, 529-38. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djh083
- Medina-Franco H, Abarca-Perez L, Cortes-Gonzalez R, et al (2005). Fine needle aspiration biopsy of breast lesions: institutional experience. Rev Invest Clin, 57, 394-8.
- Oswald G, Thomas H, Michael H, et al (2004). Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and ultrasound: can biopsy be averted? Radiology, 12, 850-6.
- Resende LM, Matias MA, Oliveira GM, et al (2008). Evaluation of breast microcalcifications according to breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) and Le Gal's classifications. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstretic, 30, 75-9
- Retsky MW, Demicheli R, Hrushesky W (2001). Breast cancer screening for women aged 40-49 years: screening may not be the benign process usually thought. J Natl Cancer Inst, 93, 1572.
- Sanders MA, Roland L, Sahoo S (2010). Clinical implications of subcategorizing BI-RADS 4 breast lesions associated with microcalcification: a radiology-pathology correlation study. Breast J, 16, 28-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00863.x
- Steve H P, Anita J K, ONE AUTHOR, et al (2000). Sonographically guided directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy using a handheld device. Radiol, 215, 694-7 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn37694
- Susan G Orel, Nicole Kay, Carol Reynolds, et al (1999). BIRADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy. Radiology, 211, 845-50. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.211.3.r99jn31845
- Tarhar I, Duffy SW, Vitak B, et al. 1999. The natural history of breast carcinoma: what have we learned from screening? Cancer, 86, 449-62 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990801)86:3<449::AID-CNCR13>3.0.CO;2-Q
- Tonegutti M, Girardi V (2008). Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 268 nonpalpable lesions. Radiol Med, 113, 65-75 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-008-0226-0
- Wanaporn B, Ornsiri A (2011). Accuracy of subcategories A,B,C in BI-RADS 4 lesions by combined mammography and breast ultrasound findings. J Med Sci, 2, 728-33.
- Wendie A, Cristina C, Patricia L, et al (2000). Breast imaging reporting and data system. Inter- and intra observer variability in feature analysis and final assessment. AJR, 174, 1769-77. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.174.6.1741769
- Wong TT, Cheung PS, Ma MK, et al (2005). Experience of stereotactic breast biopsy using the vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy device and the advanced breast biopsy instrumentation in Hong Kong. Asian J Surg, 28, 18-23 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60252-9
- Zonderland HM, Pope TL Jr, Nieborg AJ (2004). The positive predictive value of the breast imaging reporting and data system(BI-RADS) as a method of quality assessment in breast imaging in a hospital population. Eur Radiol, 10, 1743-50.
Cited by
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast as a Problem-solving Method: To Be or Not to Be? vol.20, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.12334
- Can strain elastography combined with ultrasound breast imaging reporting and data system be a more effective method in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions? vol.44, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-017-0772-y
- ACR BI-RADS Assessment Category 4 Subdivisions in Diagnostic Mammography: Utilization and Outcomes in the National Mammography Database vol.287, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017170770