DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Improvement of a Lecture Evaluation Tool in Higher Education -A case of improvement of a lecture evaluation questionnaire in "A" university-

대학 강의평가 도구 개선 방안 연구 -"A" 대학의 강의평가 문항 개선 사례-

  • Park, Hye-Rim (Department of Early Childhood Education, Seoul Theological University)
  • 박혜림 (서울신학대학교 유아교육과)
  • Received : 2012.10.18
  • Accepted : 2012.11.08
  • Published : 2012.11.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to complement the problem of lecture evaluation items and to improve the lecture evaluation items to fit to original purpose of lecture evaluation to enhance the lecture's quality. For this, meanings of good teaching, lecture evaluation domains and elements of preceding study, the contents and problems of lecture evaluation tools in A college were searched, and in this foundation, an improved lecture evaluation tool was suggested. As the result of this study, important features of the improved tool are followed: First, the compositions of evaluation domains, evaluation elements, and evaluation items were reconstituted. Second, to acquire the important information for the better lecture, the items were devised according to the features of good teaching in colleges. Third, the items concerned of evaluation elements which is commonly suggested by the lecture evaluation tools of preceding study were developed. Forth, if there is the information which is required for the enhancement of the lecture quality, the items were developed though the result could not be presented in the arithmetical means. Fifth, evaluation items to improve the problems of lecture evaluation tools which had been carried out in A college were developed.

본 연구의 목적은 현행 A대학의 강의평가 문항의 문제점을 보완하고 강의의 질 제고라는 강의평가의 본래 목적에 부합하도록 강의평가 문항을 개선하는 것이다. 이를 위하여, 대학 교육에서의 좋은 수업의 의미, 선행 연구의 강의평가 영역 및 요소, A대학의 현행 강의평가 도구의 내용 및 문제점을 살펴보았으며, 이를 토대로 개선안을 제시하였다. 연구 결과로 제안된 개선안의 주요한 특징은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 평가 영역, 평가 항목, 평가 문항의 구성 체계를 재구성하였다. 둘째, 강의 개선에 중요한 정보를 제공하기 위해 대학에서의 좋은 강의의 특징을 토대로 문항을 개발하였다. 셋째, 선행 연구의 강의평가 도구들이 공통적으로 제시하고 있는 평가 요소 등과 관련한 문항을 개발하였다. 넷째, 강의의 질 제고를 위해 필요한 정보가 있다면, 산술평균으로 결과를 제시할 수 없더라도 관련 문항을 개발하였다. 다섯째, 현행 강의평가 문항의 문제점으로 지적된 부분을 수정 보완하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Han, S. I., A Study on Analysis of Factors Associated with the Student Evaluation of Teaching: Based on Professor, Student, Instruction-. The Journal of Educational Administration, 19(4), pp. 247-266, 2001.
  2. Andrew, H. A., Teachers Can Be Fired! The Quest for Quality. Chicago: Catfeet Press, 1995.
  3. "A" university newspaper, 2011, 12, 5.
  4. Feldman, K. A., The Superior College Teacher from the Student's View. Research in Higher Education, 5, pp. 79-88, 1976. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01677208
  5. Sheehan, E. P., & Duprey, T., Student Evaluations of University Teaching. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 26, pp. 188-193, 1999.
  6. Lee, H. W., Kang, H. S., Jung, Y. S., & Heo, E. y., Analysis on Evaluation Inquiry of Lectures for the Improvement on University Lecture Quality - Focused on Liberal Art Courses of Engineering and Science Schools at SNU -. The Journal of Educational Technology, 8(4), pp. 20-56, 2005.
  7. Lee, D. S., Lee, J. Y., Lim, H. J., & Kim, P. G., Using Students' Evaluation of Teaching to Improve Instruction at Gyeongin National University of Education. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 24(2), pp. 81-117, 2007. https://doi.org/10.24211/tjkte.2007.24.2.81
  8. Park, M. J., Student' Perceptions of Good Teaching in Higher Education -An Eassy-Review of College Student-. The Journal of Humanities, 75, pp. 229-253, 2008.
  9. Min, H. R., A Study on Good Teaching Based on The Students' Awareness at SNU. Center for Teaching and Learning, Seoul National University, 2008.
  10. Lee, Y. S., Development of Self-Analysis Methods of Teaching for the Improvement of College Education. National Research Foundation of Korea, Research Report, 2009.
  11. Min, H. R., Lee, H. W., The Characteristics of Good Teaching Based on The Students' Awareness: The Comparative Analysis of Actual Learning Experiences between a University in Korea and Oversea Universities. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 19(1), pp. 57-88, 2011.
  12. Burdsal, C. A., & Bardo, J. W., Measuring Student's Perceptions of Teaching: Dimensions of Evaluation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, pp. 63-79, 1986
  13. Marsh, H. W., Students' Evaluation of University Teaching: Research Findings, Methodological Issues, and Directions for Future Research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, pp. 253-388, 1987.
  14. Jackson, D. L., Teal, C. R., Raines, S. J., Nansel, T. R., Force, R. C., & Burdsal, C. A., The Dimensions of Students' Perceptions of Teaching Effectiveness. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(4), pp. 580-596, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131649921970035
  15. Choi, Y. W., Constructing Items for Course Evaluation. Graduate School, Ewha Womans University, Master's Thesis, 1995.
  16. Lee, S. H., A Study for Instrument Development of Course Evaluation in the University Based Upon the Theory of Instructional Design. The Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1), pp. 81-108, 2001. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.17.1.81
  17. Kim, S. S., Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of The College Instruction Evaliation Tools. Graduate School, Sungkyunkwan University, Master's Thesis, 2002.
  18. Park, H. J., Choi, M, S., & Lee, G. M., Development and Validation of a Cyber Course Evaluation Tool. The Journal of Educational Evaluation, 19(2), pp. 203-223, 2006.
  19. Yum, S. C., Validating Students' Ratings of Teaching Scale and Analyzing Multilevel Models. The Journal of Educational Evaluation, 21(2), pp. 25-52, 2008.