DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

OrthoMTA와 ProRoot MTA의 항미생물 효과 비교

COMPARISON OF ANTIMICROBIAL EFFECTS OF ORTHOMTA AND PROROOT MTA

  • 김수영 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 최남기 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 박지일 (광주 보건대학교 치위생학교실) ;
  • 김선미 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실)
  • Kim, Soo-Yung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Choi, Nam-Ki (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Park, Ji-Il (Department of Dental Hygiene, Gwangju Health College) ;
  • Kim, Seon-Mi (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2012.05.13
  • 심사 : 2012.10.13
  • 발행 : 2012.11.30

초록

본 연구의 목적은 현재 많이 사용되고 있는 ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Tulsa, USA)와 최근 국내에서 새로 개발된 OrthoMTA (Bio MTA, Korea)의 감염된 근관에서 주로 발견되는 3개의 미생물에 대한 효과를 다양한 농도와 시간에서 비교하는 것이다. 50, 25, 12.5 mg/mL의 농도로 준비된 ProRoot MTA와 OrthoMTA에 Enterococcus faecalis, Fusobacterium nucleatum 그리고 Staphylococcus epidermidis를 접종 후 24, 48, 72시간에 항미생물 효과를 관찰하여 다음과 같은 연구결과를 얻었다. E. faecalis의 경우 ProRoot MTA와 OrthoMTA 50, 25, 12.5 mg/mL 농도의 모든 시간대에서 세균을 완전히 억제하지는 못했지만 양성 대조군에 비해 성장이 조금 감소한 양상을 보였다(p < 0.05). F. nucleatum의 경우 ProRoot MTA 50 mg/mL 농도의 24시간에서 미생물을 억제하였으나 시간이 지남에 따라 세균의 성장을 보인 반면 OrthoMTA의 경우 같은 농도에서 시간이 지나도 계속 세균을 억제하였다(p < 0.05). S. epidermidis의 경우 ProRoot MTA 50 mg/mL, OrthoMTA 50, 25 mg/mL 농도의 24시간에서 억제 효과를 보였으나 시간이 지나면서 세균이 조금씩 성장하였다. 그러나 전체적으로 모든 농도와 시간에서 양성 대조군에 비해서는 억제 효과를 나타냈다(p < 0.05). 본 연구를 통해 국내에서 새로 개발된 OrthoMTA는 기존의 ProRoot MTA보다 항균활성을 가지고 있음을 알 수 있었다.

The aim of this study was to compare two commercial root canal medicaments, ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Tulsa, USA) and OrthoMTA (Bio MTA, Korea), by assessing the antimicrobial effects on three selected species commonly found in root canals of infected teeth, namely Enterococcus faecalis, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Colonies of these bacteria were treated with varied concentrations of ProRoot MTA or OrthoMTA over different lengths of time. The results are as follows : 50, 25 and 12.5 mg/mL of ProRoot MTA or OrthoMTA did not completely inhibit the growth of E. faecalis, but a decreased growth rate was evident in comparison to the control (p < 0.05). 50 mg/mL of both materials successfully eliminated F. nucleatum during the first 24 hours. Regrowth of microbes after 24 hours, however, indicated a diminished effect of ProRoot MTA whereas OrthoMTA showed its continuously sustained antimicrobial actions (p < 0.05). 50 mg/mL of ProRoot MTA and 50, 25 mg/mL of OrthoMTA exerted their full antibacterial actions against S. epidermidis during the first 24 hours. Although the regrowth of colony was observed after 24 hours, the rate of growth was significantly decreased, approximating a complete inhibition (p < 0.05). The present study revealed that OrthoMTA, recently developed in Korea, had antimicrobial activity higher than ProRoot MTA.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baumgartner JC, Falkler WA Jr : Bacteria in the apical 5 mm of infected root canals. J Endod, 17: 380-383, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81989-8
  2. Fouad AF, Zerella J, Barry J, Spagnberg LS : Molecular detection of Enterococcus species in root canals of therapy-resistant endodontic infections. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 99:112-118, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.06.064
  3. Torabinejad M, Hong CU, Pitt Ford TR, Kettering JD : Antibacterial effects of some root-end filling materials. J Endod, 21:403-406, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80824-1
  4. Torabinejad M, Smith PW, Kettering JD, Pitt Ford TR : Comparative investigation of marginal adaptation of mineral trioxide aggregate and other commonly used root-end filling materials. J Endod, 21:295-299, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81004-6
  5. Wu MK, Kontakiotis EG, Wesselink PR : Long-term seal provided by some root-end filling materials. J Endod, 24:557-560, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80077-0
  6. Tziafas D, Pantelidou O, Papadimitriou S, et al. : The dentinogenic effect of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) in short-term capping experiments. Int Endod J, 5:245-254, 2002.
  7. Zhu Q, Haglund R, Safavi KE, Spagnberg LS : Adhesion of human osteoblasts on root-end filling materials. J Endod, 26:404-406, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200007000-00006
  8. Torabinejad M, Chivian N : Clinical applications of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod, 25:197-205, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80142-3
  9. Koo JE, Baek KW : MTA application to patients with cellulitis caused by dens evaginatus. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 36:310-317, 2009.
  10. Kang JY, Kim JS, Yoo SH : Comparison of setting expansion and time of OrthoMTA, ProRoot MTA and Portland cement. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 38: 229-236, 2011. https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2011.38.3.229
  11. Roberts HW, Toth JM, Berzins DW, Charlton DG : Mineral trioxide aggregate material use in endodontic treatment: a review of the literature. Dent Mater, 24:149-164, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.04.007
  12. Camilleri J, Pitt Ford TR : Mineral trioxide aggregate: a review of the constituents and biological properties of the material. Int Endod J, 39:747-754, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01135.x
  13. BioMTA technologies. Physicochemical analysis. Available from URL: http://www.biomta.com/shop/emain/index.php/2011/09/12(Accessed on August 6, 2011)
  14. Chang SW, Baek SH, Kum KY, et al. : Heavy metal analysis of OrthoMTA and ProRoot MTA. J Endod, 37:1673-1676, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.08.020
  15. Al-Nazhan S, Al-Judai A : Evaluation of antifungal activity of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod, 29:826-827, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200312000-00010
  16. Al-Hezaimi K, Naghshbandi J, Rotstein I, et al. : Comparison of antifungal activity of white-colored and gray-colored mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) at similar concentrations against Candida albicans. J Endod, 32:365-367, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.08.014
  17. Estrela C, Bammann LL, Pe'cora JD, et al. : Antimicrobial and chemical study of MTA, Portland cement, calcium hydroxide paste, Sealapex and Dycal. Braz Dent J, 11:3-9, 2000.
  18. Eldeniz AU, Hadimili HH, Ataoglu H, Orstavik D : Antibacterial effect of selected root-end filling materials. J Endod, 32:345-349, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.009
  19. Al-Hezaimi K, Al-Shalan TA, Rotstein I, et al. : MTA preparations from different origins may vary in their antimicrobial activity. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 107:85-88, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.01.045
  20. Jacinto RC, Montagner F, Gomes BP, et al. : Frequency, Microbial Interactions, and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Fusobacterium nucleatum and Fusobacterium necrophorum Isolated from Primary Endodontic Infections. J Endod, 34:1451-1456, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.08.036
  21. Sundqvist G : Ecology of the Root Canal Flora. J Endod, 18:427-430, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80842-3
  22. Gomes BP, Pinheiro ET, Souza-Filho FJ, et al. : Microbiological examination of infected dental root canals. Oral Microbiol Immunol, 19:71-76, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0902-0055.2003.00116.x
  23. Bolstad AI, Jensen HB, Bakken V : Taxonomy, Biology, and Periodontal Aspects of Fusobacterium nucleatum. Clin Microbiol Rev, 9:55-71, 1996.
  24. Rohde H, Frankenberger S, Zahringer U, Mack D : Structure, function and contribution of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) to Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilmformation and pathogenesis of biomaterial-associated infections. Eur J Cell Biol, 89:103-111, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcb.2009.10.005
  25. Pinheiro ET, Gomes BP, Souza Filho FJ, et al. : Evaluation of root canal microorganisms isolated from teeth with endodontic failure and their antimicrobial susceptibility. Oral Microbiol Immunol, 18: 100-103, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-302X.2003.00058.x
  26. Love RM : Enterococcus faecalis-a mechanism for its role in endodontic failure. Int Endod J, 34:399-405, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00437.x
  27. Duggan JM, Sedgley CM : Biofilm Formation of Oral and Endodontic Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod, 33:815-818, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.02.016
  28. Stuart CH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ, Owatz CB : Enterococcus faecalis: Its Role in Root Canal Treatment Failure and Current Concepts in Retreatment. J Endod, 32:93-98, 2006.
  29. Sundqvist G : Endodontic microbiology. In: Spagnberg LSW, ed. Experimental endodontics. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 131-153, 1990.
  30. Rocas IN, Siqueira JF Jr, Santos KR : Association of Enterococcus faecalis with different forms of periradicular diseases. J Endod, 30:315-320, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200405000-00004
  31. Basrani B, Tjaerhane L, Friedman S, et al. : Efficacy of chlorhexidine- and calcium hydroxidecontaining medicaments against Enterococcus faecalis in vitro. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 96:618-624, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(03)00166-5
  32. Heling I, Chandler NP : Antimicrobial effect of irrigant combinations within dentinal tubules. Int Endod J, 31:8-14, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1998.t01-1-00124.x
  33. Torabinejad M, Hong CU, McDonald F, Pitt Ford TR : Physical and chemical properties of a new rootend filling material. J Endod, 21:349-353, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80967-2
  34. Fridland M, Rosado R : Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) solubility and porosity with different waterto-powder ratios. J Endod, 29:814-817, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200312000-00007
  35. Fridland M, Rosado R : MTA solubility: a long term study. J Endod, 31:376-379, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000140566.97319.3e
  36. Sipert CR, Hussne RP, Nishiyama CK, Torres SA : In vitro antimicrobial activity of Fill Canal, Sealapex, mineral trioxide aggregate, Portland cement and EndoRez. Int Endod J, 38:539-543, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00984.x
  37. Chong BS, Owadally ID, Pitt Ford TR, Wilson RF : Antibacterial activity of potential retrograde root filling materials. Endod Dent Traumatol, 10:66-70, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1994.tb00062.x
  38. Lai CC, Huang FM, Chang YC, et al. : Antibacterial effects of resinous retrograde root filling materials. J Endod, 29:118-120, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200302000-00008
  39. Al-Hezaimi K, Al-Shalan TA, Rotstein I, et al. : Antibacterial Effect of Two Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) Preparations Against Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus sanguis In Vitro. J Endod, 32:1053-1056, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.06.004