DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Relationship between threatened vascular plants and the human population in Japan

  • Hayashi, Naoki (Graduate School of Environment and Information Sciences, Yokohama National University) ;
  • Watanabe, Eriko (Graduate School of Environment and Information Sciences, Yokohama National University) ;
  • Matsuda, Hiroyuki (Graduate School of Environment and Information Sciences, Yokohama National University)
  • Received : 2012.08.19
  • Accepted : 2012.10.10
  • Published : 2012.12.01

Abstract

Using data sets for Japan as a whole, as arranged with approximately $10{\times}10$ km squares (a secondary grid), we investigated the relationship between population density and the habitats of threatened vascular plants listed in the Japanese Red Data Book; depopulated areas in the present and future, areas where under-use may be serious, and those with a predominance of elderly people; and the present state of the habitats in terms of a characteristic land use pattern. Regarding the habitats of threatened vascular plants, the progress of deterioration [$(N_{CR}+N_{EN})/(N_{CR}+N_{EN}+N_{VU})$] in depopulated areas has been confirmed, where $N_{CR}$, $N_{EN}$, and $N_{VU}$ are the numbers of species classified as critically endangered, endangered, and vulnerable, respectively. Moreover, in grid squares used by a human such as farmland, the progress of the deterioration simply increases when population density becomes low. However, for many vascular plants, they are particularly endangered in populous areas. Local populations will decrease throughout Japan with the rate of depopulation in and around large cities being relatively slow. We also propose some issues that need further study. The deterioration by human activity may be reduced. On the other hand, some vascular plants may be adversely influenced by depopulation. Additionally, we should keep a close watch on grasslands and water areas in large cities to preserve vascular plants.

Keywords

References

  1. Arizono S. 1995. Land use in Japan circa 1850. In: Atlas: Environmental Change in Modern Japan (Nishikawa O, Himiyama Y, Arai T, Ota I, Kubo S, Tamura T, Murayama Y, Yorifuji T, eds). Asakura Publishing, Tokyo, pp 4-5.
  2. Cincotta RP, Wisnewski J, Engelman R. 2000. Human population in the biodiversity hotspots. Nature 404: 990-992. https://doi.org/10.1038/35010105
  3. Fujii S. 1999. A comparative analysis of habitat types of locally endangered plants in Japan. Jpn J Conserv Ecol 4: 57-69.
  4. Hayashi N. 2011. Strategic reorganization beginning with a depopulated village. J Rural Plan 29: 418-421. https://doi.org/10.2750/arp.29.418
  5. Ishikawa A. 1993. Shityouson jinkou suikei Manual [Manual for Estimate of Municipal Population]. Kokon Shoin, Tokyo.
  6. Japanese Biodiversity Outlook Science Committee, The Ministry of the Environment. 2010. Report of Comprehensive Assessment of Biodiversity in Japan. Global Biodiversity Strategy Office, Biodiversity Policy Division, Nature Conservation Bureau, The Ministry of the Environment, Tokyo.
  7. Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. 2002. World Census of Agriculture 2000. Vol. 9. Nourin Toukei Kyoukai, Tokyo.
  8. Japan Satoyama Satoumi Assessment. 2010. Satoyama-Satoumi Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Socio-ecological Production Landscapes of Japan: Summary for Decision Makers. United Nations University, Tokyo.
  9. Kaji K, Saitoh T, Uno H, Matsuda H, Yamamura K. 2010. Adaptive management of a Sika deer population in Hokkaido, Japan: theory and practice. Popul Ecol 52: 373-387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-010-0219-4
  10. McKee JK, Sciulli PW, Fooce CD, Waite TA. 2003. Forecasting global biodiversity threats associated with human population growth. Biol Conserv 115: 161-164.
  11. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC.
  12. National Institute of Population and Social Security Research. 2007. Population Projections for Japan: 2006- 2055 (With Long-range Population Projections: 2056- 2105). Health and Welfare Statistics Association, Tokyo.
  13. Numata M, Iwase T. 2002. Zusetu nihon no syokusei [Illustration on Japanese Vegetation]. Kodansha, Tokyo.
  14. Oda T. 2007. Urutora bigina no tame no SPSS niyoru toukei kaiseki nyuumon [Guide to Statistical Analysis by SPSS for a Beginner]. Pleiades Publishing House, Nagano.
  15. Oono A. 1991. Sanson no kourei ka to genkai syuuraku [Aging in mountain villages and marginal villages]. Keizai 7: 55-71.
  16. Yamamoto Y, Shindo K, Hagino K, Hirano K, Nakanishi Y, Otaki N. 2002. Changes in vegetation due to the stopped controlled burns in the semi-natural grassland of Aso region. Grassl Sci 48: 416-420.

Cited by

  1. Underuse/overuse and diversity of provisioning services and their change: the case of the Japanese national ecosystem service assessment (JBO2) pp.1862-4057, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0531-z