DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Reliability Prediction Comparison of Aero Space Electronic Equipments

항공기 전자장비의 신뢰성 예측 비교 연구

  • Jo, In-Tak (Korea Aerospace Industries, LTD.) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Cheon (Division of Industrial Systems Engineering, ERI, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kim, Yun-Hee (Defense Agency for Technology and Quality)
  • 조인탁 (한국항공우주산업) ;
  • 이상천 (경상대학교 산업시스템공학부, 공학연구원) ;
  • 김윤희 (국방기술품질원)
  • Received : 2012.07.06
  • Accepted : 2012.10.11
  • Published : 2012.12.01

Abstract

Before an aircraft is delivered to customers, manufacturers have to verify required reliability for the aircraft. In usual, reliability of electronic equipments in military aircraft are predicted based on MIL-HDBK-217. But the specification has not been revised since 1995. Some alternatives including SR-332 and 217PLUS are suggested in this study. The processes and methods specified in MIL-HDBK-217 are compared with those of SR-332. Additionally, the predicted reliability of aircraft electronic equipment between usage data and field data are investigated using MIL-HDBK-217. The results show that predicted reliability of MIL-HDBK-217 is more conservative (underestimated) than that of usage data and field data.

Keywords

References

  1. Brown, L. M. (2004), Camparing Reliability Predictions to Field Data for Plastic Parts in a Military, Airborne Environment, Reliability Analysis Center(RAC).
  2. Dylis, D. D. (2004), A Comprehensive Reliability Assessment Tool for Electronic Systems, Reliability Analysis Center(RAC),
  3. Fuqua, N. B. (2005), Electronic Reliability Prediction, Selected Topics in Assurance Related Technologies.
  4. ITEM Software (2007), Reliability Prediction Basics.
  5. Jeon, T.-B. (2007), Comparison of Reliability Prediction Specifications through Some Electronic Parts, Journal of Industrial Technology, Kangwon Natl, Univ. Korea, 27B, 255-261.
  6. Jeon, T.-B. (2009), An Overview on the Emergence of the Reliability Prediction Methodology $217PLUS^{TM}$, Journal of Industrial Technology, Kangwon Natl, Univ. Korea, 29A, 28-36.
  7. Jung, H.-S., Kwan, Y.-I., and Park, D.-H. (2009), Reliability Test and Analysis, Youngchi-munhwa-sa.
  8. Kim, Y.-I., Byun, K.-S., and Kim, H.-T. (2009), Case Study on Improvement of Reliability Prediction Accuracy in Development Phase for Aircraft, The Korean Society For Aeronautical Science And Flight Operation, 25-31.
  9. Lee, D.-K. and Shim, J. H. (2010), Reliability Prediction using Telcordia SR-332 Issue 2, The Korean Society for Railway, 2242-2248.
  10. Lee, Y.-E., Choi, J.-Y., and Kang, J.-Y. (2010), Mission Reliability Analysis and Prediction for Aircraft System based on FA-50 Aircraft Development Experience.
  11. MIL-HDBK-217F Notice 2 (1995), Military Handbook, Reliability Prediction of Electronic Equipment, Department of Defense.
  12. MIL-HDBK-338B (1998), Electronic Reliability Design Handbook.
  13. MIL-STD-756B (1981), Reliability Modeling and Prediction.
  14. MIL-STD-785B (1980), Reliability Program for Systems and Equipment Development and Production.
  15. Moasoft (2002), A Guide Book for Reliability Prediction.
  16. Raghuram, R. (2008), HCL, Challenges in Reliability Prediction of Aircraft Subsystems.
  17. Smith, C. L. (2004), Raytheon Assessment of PRISM As a Field Failure Prediction Tool, Raytheon Company.