DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on Common Errors in Digital Impressions: (An Example of CEREC$^{(R)}$ AC)

디지털 인상 채득 시 흔히 발생하는 오류에 관한 연구 - CEREC$^{(R)}$ AC의 사례 중심으로 -

  • Kim, Jae-Hong (Department of Health Science Specialized in Dental Lab. Science & Engineering, Graduate School, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Hwan (Department of Health Science Specialized in Dental Lab. Science & Engineering, Graduate School, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Hae-Young (Department of Health Science Specialized in Dental Lab. Science & Engineering, Graduate School, Korea University)
  • 김재홍 (고려대학교 대학원 보건과학과 치의기공) ;
  • 김지환 (고려대학교 대학원 보건과학과 치의기공) ;
  • 김혜영 (고려대학교 대학원 보건과학과 치의기공)
  • Received : 2011.07.27
  • Accepted : 2011.09.20
  • Published : 2011.09.30

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was a quantitative evaluation of common errors in digital impression procedure using CEREC$^{(R)}$ AC system. Methods: Two-hundreds digital impression data comprising 174 inlays, 26 onlays by CEREC$^{(R)}$ AC in-office CAD/CAM system were obtained from a dental clinic. One evaluator assessed errors of the digital impression data and divided into five categories of errors: inappropriate scanner positioning (ISP), improper handling with a scanner (IHS), irregular powder arrangement (IPA), improper cavity preparation (ICP), and insufficient scanned data (ISD). Results: The most common errors were IPA(21%), and ISP and ISD were followed by 17% respectively. IHS was found in 14.5% of all digital impression data. ICP comprising only 6.5% was the rarest. Conclusion: Most errors were due to inaccurate manipulation with an intraoral scanner or improper cavity preparation for scanning. A deliberate manipulation to prevent common errors mentioned may deliver an optimal result in the digital impression procedure.

Keywords

References

  1. 신흥, CEREC- CAD/CAM for dentistry from vision to reality. CEREC 3 소개자료, 신흥 CAD/CAM 판매팀, 2008.
  2. Aleksandar T, Dejan L, Vojkan L, Aleksandra SG. Possible Errors During the Optical Impression Procedure. Serbian Dental Journal, 57(1), 30-37, 2010. https://doi.org/10.2298/SGS1001030T
  3. Akbar JH, Petrie CS, Walker MP, Williams K, Eick JD. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs. J Prosthodont, 15(3), 155-163, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00095.x
  4. Bindl A, Mormann WH. Clinical and SEM evaluation of all-ceramic chair-side CAD/CAM generated partial crowns. Eur J Oral Sci, 111(2), 163-169, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0722.2003.00022.x
  5. Christensen GJ. In-office CAD/CAM milling of restorations - the future. J Am Dent Assoc, 139⑶, 83-85, 2008. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0025
  6. Fasbinder DJ. Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM restorations. J Am Dent Assoc, 137 (3), 22S-31S, 2006.
  7. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent, 3(1), 45-64, 2001.
  8. Lutard R, Weber A, Rudolph H, Schone C, Quaas S, Walter M. Design and production of dental prosthetic restoration: basic research on dental CAD/CAM technology. Int J Comput Dent, 5(1), 165-176, 2002.
  9. Luthardt RG, Bornemann G , Lemelson S, Walter MH, Hu¨ ls A. An innovative method forevaluation of the 3-D internal fit of CAD/CAM crowns fabricated after direct optical versus indirect laser scan digitalizing. Int J Prosthodont, 17(6), 680-685, 2004.
  10. Luthardt RG, Koch R, Rudolph H, Walter MH. Qualitative computer aided evaluation of dental impressions in vivo. J Dent Mater, 22(4), 69-76, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.015
  11. Mormann WH. The evolution of CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc, 137(2), 7S-13S, 2006.
  12. Mormann WH. State of the art of CAD/CAM restorations 20 years of CEREC. 1st, Quintessence Publishing Co. Ltd, 1-8, 2006.
  13. Rekow D. Computer-aided design and manufacturing in dentistry: a review of the state of the art. J Prosthet Dent, 58(3), 512-516, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90285-X
  14. Sebastian Q, Heike R, Ralph G. Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations. J Dent, 35(3), 903-908, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.08.008
  15. Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, Van NR. Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/CAM, J Dent, 35(1), 68-73, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.04.008

Cited by

  1. CEREC$^{(R)}$ AC system으로 채득된 디지털 인상의 재현성, 정확성 평가에 관한 연구 vol.34, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2012.34.2.121
  2. 치과용 스캐너로 채득한 디지털 모형의 반복성 및 재현성에 관한 3차원적 평가 vol.34, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2012.34.3.213