DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Technical Review on the QRA of Railway Safety Facilities

철도 안전 설비의 정량적 위험평가 기술

  • Choi, Kwon-Hee (R/D division, ARTech Co., Ltd) ;
  • Kim, You-Ho (R/D division, ARTech Co., Ltd) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Woo (Graduate School of Railroad, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Song, Joong-Ho (Graduate School of Railroad, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Song, Kwang-Yeol (Signaling and Control Division, Korea Rail Network Authority)
  • 최권희 ((주)에이알텍 기술연구소) ;
  • 김유호 ((주)에이알텍 기술연구소) ;
  • 이종우 (서울과학기술대학교 철도전문대학원) ;
  • 송중호 (서울과학기술대학교 철도전문대학원) ;
  • 송광열 (한국철도시설고안 신호제어처)
  • Received : 2011.07.20
  • Accepted : 2011.09.21
  • Published : 2011.09.30

Abstract

The overall goal of a safety based railroad system is either to eliminate hazards in designing or to minimize the possibility of it. In order to indicate system safety or low risk although it may not be possible to achieve zero risk conditions, first, it shall ensure that any disasters would occur due to system operation because the prescribed specifications are properly fulfilled and there are no failures of any kind. Second, the risk of faults or failures leading to a mishap must be eliminated or minimized by using fault-tolerance or fail-safe procedures. This paper will attempt to summarize the personal and social risk criterion at widely scattered points, presently used as a safety approach in all over EU, in order to establish the step by step procedures of the detailed standard for railway facilities. In addition, we present the new safety analysis method using the SIL-based evaluation standard and the Reachability Graph of the Petri Net.

Keywords

References

  1. "철도시설 안전기준에 관한 규칙", 국토해양부, 2011.6.7.
  2. "철도시설 안전세부기준", 국토해양부, 2011.8.3.
  3. "Functional safety of electrical/electronic/ progranmable electroric safety-related systems", IEC 61508, 2010.
  4. Melchers RE, Society. Tolerable and the ALARP principle. In: Melchers RE, Stewart MG,. Editors. Probabilistic risk and hazard assessment. Netherlands: Balkema, 1993:243-295
  5. Sharp JV, Kam JC, Birkinshaw M. Review of criteria for inspection and maintenance and artic engineering (OMAE 1993), Vol.2, New York: ASME, 1993:363-371.
  6. JOSEF BORCSOK, EVZUDIN UGLJESA, "Markov Models for 2004 Architecture for Safety Related Systems", 6th WSEAS Int. Conference on Computational Intelligence, Man-Machine Systems and Cybemetics, Tenerife Spain, December 14-16, 2007
  7. Hu Qunfang, Huang Hongwei, "The overview and study on the modeling of risk acceptance criteria for tunnel and underground engineering", The second Japan-China Joint Scminar for the Graduate Student in Civil Engineering Nagasaki, Japan 2005. 8.26-30
  8. V.M. Trbojevic, "Risk criteria in EU", Risk Support Limited, London, U.K.
  9. Institute of Chemical Engineering, Nomenclature for hazard and risk assessment in the process industries, 1985.
  10. Famer FR(1967) Criteria - a New Approach Atom Vol 128, pp 152-170 and presented at the IAEA Symposium on Containment and Siting, 3-7 April 1967, Viema.
  11. D.S. Bowles, L.R. Anderson, J.B. Evelyn, T.F. Glover, D.M. van Dorpe, Alamo dam demonstration risk assessment, ASDSO meeting, 1999.
  12. USBR, US Department of interior Burcau of Reclamation, Guidelines for achieving public protection in dam safetydecision making, 1997.
  13. NANCY G. LEVESON AND JANICE L. STOLZY, "Safety Analysis Using Petr Nets", IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, VOL. SE-13, NO. 3, MARCH 1987.

Cited by

  1. 철도 신호제어 시스템의 AHP 기법 적용을 통한 성능평가 대상설비 항목 개선 및 안전성 확보에 관한 연구 vol.23, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12812/ksms.2021.23.1.071