Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Dimensional change of the healed periosteum on surgically created defects

  • Cho, Eun-Hee (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Park, Jung-Chul (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Cha, Jae-Kook (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Yong-Tae (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Jung, Ui-Won (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Sung (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Chong-Kwan (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2011.05.20
  • Accepted : 2011.06.22
  • Published : 2011.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The final goal of regenerative periodontal therapy is to restore the structure and function of the periodontium destroyed or lost due to periodontitis. However, the role of periosteum in periodontal regeneration was relatively neglected while bone repair in the skeleton occurs as a result of a significant contribution from the periosteum. The aim of this study is to understand the histological characteristics of periosteum and compare the native periosteum with the repaired periosteum after elevating flap or after surgical intervention with flap elevation. Methods: Buccal and lingual mucoperiosteal flaps were reflected to surgically create critical-size, "box-type" (4 mm width, 5 mm depth), one-wall, intrabony defects at the distal aspect of the 2nd and the mesial aspect of the 4th mandibular premolars in the right and left jaw quadrants. Animals were sacrificed after 24 weeks. Results: The results from this study are as follows: 1) thickness of periosteum showed difference as follows (P<0.05): control group ($0.45{\pm}0.22$ mm)> flap-elevation group ($0.36{\pm}0.07$ mm)> defect formation group ($0.26{\pm}0.03$ mm), 2) thickness of gingival tissue showed difference as follows (P<0.05): defect formation group ($3.15{\pm}0.40$ mm)> flap-elevation group ($2.02{\pm}0.25$ mm) > control group ($1.88{\pm}0.27$ mm), 3) higher cellular activity was observed in defect formation group and flap-elevation groups than control group, 4) the number of blood vessles was higher in defect formation group than control group. Conclusions: In conclusion, prolonged operation with increased surgical trauma seems to decrease the thickness of repaired periosteum and increase the thickness of gingiva. More blood vessles and high cellular activity were observed in defect formation group.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : NRF

References

  1. Karring T, Nyman S, Gottlow J, Laurell L. Development of the biological concept of guided tissue regeneration--animal and human studies. Periodontol 2000 1993;1:26-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1993.tb00204.x
  2. Nemcovsky CE, Artzi Z, Moses O. Rotated split palatal flap for soft tissue primary coverage over extraction sites with immediate implant placement. Description of the surgical procedure and clinical results. J Periodontol 1999;70: 926-34. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1999.70.8.926
  3. Wang PD, Pitman DP, Jans HH. Ridge augmentation using a subepithelial connective tissue pedicle graft. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1993;5:47-51.
  4. Nemcovsky CE, Moses O, Artzi Z, Gelernter I. Clinical coverage of dehiscence defects in immediate implant procedures: three surgical modalities to achieve primary soft tissue closure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15: 843-52.
  5. Steiner GG, Kallet MP, Steiner DM, Roulet DN. The inverted periosteal graft. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2007; 28:154-61.
  6. Allen MR, Hock JM, Burr DB. Periosteum: biology, regulation, and response to osteoporosis therapies. Bone 2004; 35:1003-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2004.07.014
  7. Engdahl E, Ritsilä V, Uddströmer L. Growth potential of cranial suture bone autograft. II. An experimental microscopic investigation in young rabbits. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1978;12:125-9. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844317809012983
  8. O'Driscoll SW, Salter RB. The repair of major osteochondral defects in joint surfaces by neochondrogenesis with autogenous osteoperiosteal grafts stimulated by continuous passive motion. An experimental investigation in the rabbit. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;(208):131-40.
  9. O'Driscoll SW, Fitzsimmons JS. The importance of procedure specific training in harvesting periosteum for chondrogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000;(380):269-78.
  10. Sakaguchi Y, Sekiya I, Yagishita K, Muneta T. Comparison of human stem cells derived from various mesenchymal tissues: superiority of synovium as a cell source. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:2521-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21212
  11. De Bari C, Dell'Accio F, Vanlauwe J, Eyckmans J, Khan IM, Archer CW, et al. Mesenchymal multipotency of adult human periosteal cells demonstrated by single-cell lineage analysis. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:1209-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21753
  12. Simpson AH. The blood supply of the periosteum. J Anat 1985;140(Pt 4):697-704.
  13. Squier CA, Ghoneim S, Kremenak CR. Ultrastructure of the periosteum from membrane bone. J Anat 1990;171: 233-9.
  14. Campelo LD, Camara JR. Flapless implant surgery: a 10-year clinical retrospective analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:271-6.
  15. Ramfjord SF, Costich ER. Healing after exposure of periosteum on the alveolar process. J Periodontol 1968;39:199-207.
  16. Wood DL, Hoag PM, Donnenfeld OW, Rosenfeld LD. Alveolar crest reduction following full and partial thickness flaps. J Periodontol 1972;43:141-4. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1972.43.3.141
  17. Wilderman MN, Pennel BM, King K, Barron JM. Histogenesis of repair following osseous surgery. J Periodontol 1970;41:551-65. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1970.41.10.551
  18. Van der Zee E, Oosterveld P, Van Waas MA. Effect of GBR and fixture installation on gingiva and bone levels at adjacent teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:62-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01005.x
  19. Casap N, Tarazi E, Wexler A, Sonnenfeld U, Lustmann J. Intraoperative computerized navigation for flapless implant surgery and immediate loading in the edentulous mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:92-8.
  20. Hahn J. Single-stage, immediate loading, and flapless surgery. J Oral Implantol 2000;26:193-8. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2000)026<0193:SILAFS>2.3.CO;2
  21. Breitbart AS, Grande DA, Kessler R, Ryaby JT, Fitzsimmons RJ, Grant RT. Tissue engineered bone repair of calvarial defects using cultured periosteal cells. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;101:567-74. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199803000-00001
  22. Ritsilä V, Alhopuro S, Rintala A. Bone formation with free periosteum. An experimental study. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1972;6:51-6. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844317209103459
  23. Ritsilä V, Alhopuro S, Gylling U, Rintala A. The use of free periosteum for bone formation in congenital clefts of the maxilla. A preliminary report. Scand J PlastReconstr Surg 1972;6:57-60. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844317209103460
  24. Goldman HM, Smukler H. Controlled surgical stimulation of periosteum. J Periodontol 1978;49:518-22. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1978.49.10.518
  25. Cohen J, Lacroix P. Bone and cartilage formation by periosteum; assay of experimental autogenous grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1955;37-A:717-30. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-195537040-00005
  26. Yamamiya K, Okuda K, Kawase T, Hata K, Wolff LF, Yoshie H. Tissue-engineered cultured periosteum used with platelet-rich plasma and hydroxyapatite in treating human osseous defects. J Periodontol 2008;79:811-8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070518
  27. Schantz JT, Hutmacher DW, Chim H, Ng KW, Lim TC, Teoh SH. Induction of ectopic bone formation by using human periosteal cells in combination with a novel scaffold technology. Cell Transplant 2002;11:125-38.
  28. Sakata Y, Ueno T, Kagawa T, Kanou M, Fujii T, Yamachika E, et al. Osteogenic potential of cultured human periosteum-derived cells - a pilot study of human cell transplantationinto a rat calvarial defect model. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2006;34:461-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2006.07.861
  29. Kim CS, Choi SH, Chai JK, Cho KS, Moon IS, Wikesjö UM, et al. Periodontal repair in surgically created intrabony defects in dogs: influence of the number of bone walls on healing response. J Periodontol 2004;75:229-35. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.2.229
  30. Tang XM, Chai BF. Ultrastructural investigation of osteogenic cells. Chin Med J (Engl) 1986;99:950-6.
  31. Tonna EA. Response of the cellular phase of the skeleton to trauma. Periodontics 1966;4:105-14.
  32. Simon TM, Van Sickle DC, Kunishima DH, Jackson DW. Cambium cell stimulation from surgical release of the periosteum. J Orthop Res 2003;21:470-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00206-1
  33. Nobuto T, Suwa F, Kono T, Taguchi Y, Takahashi T, Kanemura N, et al. Microvascular response in the periosteum following mucoperiosteal flap surgery in dogs: angiogenesis and bone resorption and formation. J Periodontol 2005;76:1346-53. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.8.1346
  34. Nobuto T, Yanagihara K, Teranishi Y, Minamibayashi S, Imai H, Yamaoka A. Periosteal microvasculature in the dog alveolar process. J Periodontol 1989;60:709-15. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1989.60.12.709
  35. Nobuto T, Imai H, Suwa F, Kono T, Suga H, Jyoshi K, et al. Microvascular response in the periodontal ligament following mucoperiosteal flap surgery. J Periodontol 2003;74: 521-8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.4.521

Cited by

  1. A novel porcine acellular dermal matrix scaffold used in periodontal regeneration vol.5, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2013.1
  2. A Modified Rabbit Ulna Defect Model for Evaluating Periosteal Substitutes in Bone Engineering: A Pilot Study vol.2, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2014.00080
  3. Pedicled Lingual Flap to Provide Keratinized Tissue Regeneration Over Dental Implants: A Description of the Technique and a Case Report vol.41, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-12-00218
  4. Comparison of collagen membrane and bone substitute as a carrier for rhBMP‐2 in lateral onlay graft vol.26, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12320
  5. Changes in mucogingival junction after an apically positioned flap with collagen matrix at sites with or without previous guided bone regeneration: A prospective comparative cohort study vol.31, pp.12, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13665