DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Utility of the computed tomography indices on cone beam computed tomography images in the diagnosis of osteoporosis in women

  • Koh, Kwang-Joon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, and Institute of Oral Bio Science, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Kyoung-A (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, and Institute of Oral Bio Science, Chonbuk National University)
  • Received : 2011.02.09
  • Accepted : 2011.05.12
  • Published : 2011.09.30

Abstract

Purpose : This study evaluated the potential use of the computed tomography indices (CTI) on cone beam CT (CBCT) images for an assessment of the bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. Materials and Methods : Twenty-one postmenopausal osteoporotic women and 21 postmenopausal healthy women were enrolled as the subjects. The BMD of the lumbar vertebrae and femur were calculated by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) using a DXA scanner. The CBCT images were obtained from the unilateral mental foramen region using a PSR-$9000N^{TM}$ Dental CT system. The axial, sagittal, and coronal images were reconstructed from the block images using $OnDemend3D^{TM}$. The new term "CTI" on CBCT images was proposed. The relationship between the CT measurements and BMDs were assessed and the intra-observer agreement was determined. Results : There were significant differences between the normal and osteoporotic groups in the computed tomography mandibular index superior (CTI(S)), computed tomography mandibular index inferior (CTI(I)), and computed tomography cortical index (CTCI). On the other hand, there was no difference between the groups in the computed tomography mental index (CTMI: inferior cortical width). Conclusion : CTI(S), CTI(I), and CTCI on the CBCT images can be used to assess the osteoporotic women.

Keywords

References

  1. Verheij JG, Geraets WG, van der Stelt PF, Horner K, Lindh C, Nicopoulou-Karayianni K, et al. Prediction of osteoporosis with dental radiographs and age. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38 : 431-7. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/55502190
  2. White SC. Oral radiographic predictors of osteoporosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31 : 84-92. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600674
  3. Nackaerts O, Jacobs R, Devlin H, Pavitt S, Bleyen E, Yan B, et al. Osteoporosis detection using intraoral densitometry. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37 : 282-7. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/30424604
  4. Kim JY, Nah KS, Jung YH. Comparison of panorama radiomorphometric indices of the mandible in normal and osteoporotic women. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 2004; 34 : 69-74.
  5. Klemetti E, Kolmakov S, Heiskanen P, Vainio P, Lassila V. Panoramic mandibular index and bone mineral densities in postmenopausal women. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 75 : 774-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(93)90438-A
  6. Hua Y, Nackaerts O, Duyck J, Maes F, Jacobs R. Bone quality assessment based on cone beam computed tomography imaging. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20 : 767-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01677.x
  7. Lindh C, Nilsson M, Klinge B, Petersson A. Quantitative computed tomography of trabecular bone in the mandible. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996; 25 : 146-50. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.25.3.9084263
  8. Taguchi A, Tanimoto K, Suei Y, Ohama K, Wada T. Relationship between the mandibular and lumbar vertebral bone mineral density at different postmenopausal stages. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996; 25 : 130-5. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.25.3.9084261
  9. Horner K, Karayianni K, Mitsea A, Berkas L, Mastoris M, Jacobs R, et al. The mandibular cortex on radiographs as a tool for osteoporosis risk assessment: the OSTEODENT project. J Clin Densitom 2007; 10 : 138-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2007.02.004
  10. Karayianni K, Horner K, Mitsea A, Berkas L, Mastoris M, Jacobs R, et al. Accuracy in osteoporosis diagnosis of a combination of mandibular cortical width measurement on dental panoramic radiographs and a clinical risk index (OSIRIS): the OSTEODENT project. Bone 2007; 40 : 223-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2006.07.025
  11. Horner K, Devlin H, Alsop CW, Hodgkinson IM, Adams JE. Mandibular bone mineral density as a predictor of skeletal osteoporosis. Br J Radiol 1996; 69 : 1019-25. https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-69-827-1019
  12. Taguchi A, Tsuda M, Ohtsuka M, Kodama I, Sanada M, Nakamoto T, et al. Use of dental panoramic radiographs in identifying younger postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2006; 17 : 387-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-2029-7
  13. Drozdzowska B, Pluskiewicz W, Tarnawska B. Panoramic-based mandibular indices in relation to mandibular bone mineral density and skeletal status assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31 : 361-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600729
  14. Horner K, Devlin H. The relationship between two indices of mandibular bone quality and bone mineral density measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998; 27 : 17-21. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600307
  15. Taguchi A, Suei Y, Ohtsuka M, Otani K, Tanimoto K, Ohtaki M. Usefulness of panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis in women. Width and morphology of inferior cortex of the mandible. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996; 25 : 263-7.
  16. Ledgerton D, Horner K, Devlin H, Worthington H. Panoramic mandibular index as a radiomorphometric tool: an assessment of precision. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997; 26 : 95-100. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600215
  17. Horner K, Allen P, Graham J, Jacobs R, Boonen S, Pavitt S, et al. The relationship between the OSTEODENT index and hip fracture risk assessment using FRAX. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 110 : 243-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.03.035
  18. Taguchi A, Suei Y, Sanada M, Ohtsuka M, Nakamoto T, Sumida H, et al. Validation of dental panoramic radiography measures for identifying postmenopausal women with spinal osteoporosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183 : 1755-60. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.183.6.01831755
  19. Adams JE. Osteoporosis and bone mineral densitometry. Curr Opin Radiol 1992; 4 : 11-20.
  20. Benson BW, Prihoda TJ, Glass BJ. Variations in adult cortical bone mass as measured by a panoramic mandibular index. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991; 71 : 349-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(91)90314-3
  21. Watson EL, Katz RV, Adelezzi R, Gift HC, Dunn SM. The measurement of mandibular cortical bone height in osteoporotic vs. non-osteoporotic postmenopausal women. Spec Care Dentist 1995; 15 : 124-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-4505.1995.tb00494.x
  22. Klemetti E, Kolmakov S, Kroger H. Pantomography in assessment of the osteoporosis risk group. Scand J Dent Res 1994; 102 : 68-72.
  23. Devlin H, Karayianni K, Mitsea A, Jacobs R, Lindh C, van der Stelt P, et al. Diagnosing osteoporosis by using dental panoramic radiographs: The OSTEODENT project. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104 : 821-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.12.027
  24. Horner K, Devlin H. The relationship between mandibular bone mineral density and panoramic radiographic measurements. J Dent 1998; 26 : 337-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00020-1

Cited by

  1. The osseous and dental changes of patients with chronic renal failure by CBCT vol.44, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140398
  2. Cone Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation of Postmenopausal Alveolar Bone Changes in Osteoporotic Women vol.6, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10012-1138
  3. Retrieval of Cold Welded Dental Implant Cover Screw using a New Technique vol.6, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10012-1139
  4. Osteoporoseerkennung mittels digitaler Volumentomographie vol.45, pp.12, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-016-3340-z
  5. Clinical cone beam computed tomography compared to high-resolution peripheral computed tomography in the assessment of distal radius bone vol.27, pp.10, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3609-4
  6. Feasibility of cone beam computed tomography radiomorphometric analysis and fractal dimension in assessment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in correlation with dual X-ray absorptiometry vol.45, pp.7, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160212
  7. Validation of cone-beam computed tomography as a predictor of osteoporosis using the Klemetti classification vol.30, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2016.vol30.0073
  8. Evaluation of osteoporosis in jaw bones using cone beam CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry vol.58, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.15-0609
  9. Analysis of Bone Quality on Panoramic Radiograph in Osteoporosis Research by Fractal Dimension vol.7, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2016.74035
  10. Use of cone beam computed tomography in identifying postmenopausal women with osteoporosis vol.12, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-017-0314-7
  11. Efficacy of radiographic density values of the first and second cervical vertebrae recorded by CBCT technique to identify patients with osteoporosis and osteopenia vol.11, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2017.034
  12. Analysis of mandibular changes using panoramic-based indices in patients with chronic renal failure vol.41, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5301/ijao.5000649
  13. Investigation of dental cone-beam CT pixel data and a modified method for conversion to Hounsfield unit (HU) vol.47, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20170321
  14. Near-infrared bone densitometry: A feasibility study on distal radius measurement vol.11, pp.7, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201700342
  15. Detecting the effect of bisphosphonates during osteoporosis treatment on jawbones using multidetector computed tomography: The OSTEOSYR project vol.9, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12332
  16. Digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam CT as ancillary tools to detect low bone mineral density in post-menopausal women vol.48, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20180254
  17. Use of experimental phantoms to determine the accuracy and reliability of mandibular cortical width measurements by panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography vol.62, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.19-0307
  18. Analysis of Cortical and Mandibular Trabeculae Quality with β-crosslaps Levels in Postmenopausal Women Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography vol.11, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1704
  19. Mandibular cortical indices and their relation to gender and age in the cone-beam computed tomography vol.49, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20190210
  20. Relationship between Bone Expansion in Odontogenic Keratocyst and Mandibular Cortical Bone vol.20, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5466/ijoms.20.24
  21. Gray values of the cervical vertebrae detected by cone beam computed tomography for the identification of osteoporosis and osteopenia in postmenopausal women vol.133, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2021.06.014