족관절 관절염이 있는 환자에서 체중 부하상태의 양측 족관절과 환측 족관절 전후면 방사선 사진의 방사선학적 측정치의 비교

Comparison of Radiologic Parameters between Weight Bearing Affected Single Ankle Anteroposterior View and both Ankle Anteroposterior View in Ankle Osteoarthritis

  • 김정래 (영남대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 이우천 (인제대학교 의과대학 서울백병원 정형외과학교실)
  • Kim, Jung-Rae (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Woo-Chun (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2011.07.18
  • 심사 : 2011.08.16
  • 발행 : 2011.09.15

초록

Purpose: This study was performed to analyze the results of radiologic parameters between weight bearing affected single ankle anteroposterior (AP) view and both ankle AP view in ankle osteoarthritis (OA). Materials and Methods: Between January 2009 and August 2010, 41 patients (50 ankles) who visited our institution to treat ankle OA were reviewed retrospectively. In radiographic assessment, weight bearing affected single ankle AP view and both ankle AP view were checked, and measured tibial anterior surface angle (TAS), tibial medial malleolar angle (TMM), talar tilting angle (TT), maximum and minimun joint space width (JSW) of ankle, width between articular surface of medial malleolar and medial articular surface of talus as radiologic parameters. Results: On weight bearing both ankle AP view, TAS was $85.4{\pm}4.1^{\circ}$, TMM was $33.1{\pm}9^{\circ}$, TT was $5.4{\pm}6.1^{\circ}$, maximum JSW was $3.2{\pm}2.7$ mm, minimum JSW was $1.1{\pm}1.3$ mm, width between articular surface of medial malleolar and medial articular surface of talus was $1.8{\pm}1.8$ mm and on weight bearing affected ankle AP view, TAS was $85.3{\pm}3.9^{\circ}$, TMM was $34.3{\pm}10.9^{\circ}$, TT was $5.4{\pm}6.5^{\circ}$, maximum JSW was $3.2{\pm}2.7$ mm, minimum JSW was $1.1{\pm}1.3$ mm, width between articular surface of medial malleolar and medial articular surface of talus was $1.6{\pm}1.7$ mm. Conclusion: There is no statistical significance in radiologic parameters between weight-bearing affected single ankle AP view and both ankle AP view in ankle OA.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, Kumai T, Tamai S. Low tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the ankle. Results of a new operation in 18 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:50-4.
  2. Kujala UM, Friberg O, Aalto T, Kvist M, Osterman K. Lower limb asymmetry and patellofemoral joint incongruence in the etiology of knee exertion injuries in athletes. Int J Sports Med. 1987;8:214-20. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1025658
  3. Buckland-Wright. Radiographic assessment of osteoarthritis: comparison between existing methodologies. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1999;7:430-3. https://doi.org/10.1053/joca.1998.0234
  4. Mazzuca SA, Brandt KD, Buckwalter KA. Detection of radiographic joint space narrowing in subjects with knee osteoarthritis: longitudinal comparison of the metatarsophalangeal and semiflexed anteroposterior views. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:385-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10765
  5. Tanaka Y, Takakura Y, Hayashi K, Taniguchi A, Kumai T, Sugimoto K. Low tibial osteotomy for varus-type osteoarthritis of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:909-13. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.01398
  6. Joy G, Patzakis MJ, Harvey JP Jr. Precise evaluation of the reduction of severe ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56:979-93. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-197456050-00010
  7. Park SS, Kubiak EN, Egol KA, Kummer F, Koval KJ. Stress radiographs after ankle fracture: the effect of ankle position and deltoid ligament status on medial clear space measurements. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20:11-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bot.0000189591.40267.09
  8. Boegard T, Jonsson K. Radiography in osteoarthritis of the knee. Skeletal Radiol. 1999;28:605-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002560050561
  9. Lynch JA, Buckland-Wright JC, Macfarlane DG. Precision of joint space width measurement in knee osteoarthritis from digital image analysis of high definition macroradiographs. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1993;1:209-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1063-4584(05)80327-9
  10. Dieppe PA. Recommended methodology for assessing the progression of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee joints. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1995;3:73-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1063-4584(05)80040-8
  11. Marijnissen AC, Vincken KL, Viergever MA, et al. Ankle images digital analysis (AIDA): digital measurement of joint space width and subchondral sclerosis on standard radiographs. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2001;9:264-72. https://doi.org/10.1053/joca.2000.0384
  12. Goker B, Gonen E, Demirag MD, Block JA. Quantification of the radiographic joint space width of the ankle. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2083-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0832-8
  13. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo- arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16:494-502. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.16.4.494
  14. Lofvenberg R, Karrholm J, Lund B. The outcome of nonoperated patients with chronic lateral instability of the ankle: a 20-year follow-up study. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:165-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079401500401
  15. Hayashi K, Tanaka Y, Kumai T, Sugimoto K, Takakura Y. Correlation of compensatory alignment of the subtalar joint to the progression of primary osteoarthritis of the ankle. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29:400-6. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2008.0400
  16. Valderrabano V, Horisberger M, Russell I, Dougall H, Hintermann B. Etiology of ankle osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:1800-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0543-6
  17. Cushnaghan J, Dieppe P. Study of 500 patients with limb joint osteoarthritis. I. Analysis by age, sex, and distribution of symptomatic joint sites. Ann Rheum Dis. 1991;50:8-13. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.50.1.8
  18. Huch K, Kuettner KE, Dieppe P. Osteoarthritis in ankle and knee joints. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1997;26:667-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-0172(97)80002-9
  19. Saltzman CL, Salamon ML, Blanchard GM, et al. Epidemiology of ankle arthritis: report of a consecutive series of 639 patients from a tertiary orthopaedic center. Iowa Orthop J. 2005;25: 44-6.