DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Production of Multiple Probiotics and the Performance of Laying Hens by Proper Level of Dietary Supplementation

복합 생균제의 생산과 산란계에서 생균제의 적정 급여 수준에 의한 산란 효과

  • Received : 2011.06.01
  • Accepted : 2011.09.19
  • Published : 2011.09.30

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to evaluate the dietary effects of multiple mixture of probiotics on laying performance and the faecal examination in laying hens (Hy-line Brown) at the early (21~40 wk) and middle (41~65 wk) laying term. Multiple probiotics were produced by developing products and the properties of microorganisms were examined for detecting of acid-resistance, bile salt-resistance and antibacterial activity against pathogenic enteric bacteria. Probiotics produced to the fermenting cultures of four selected organisms and soybean meal substrates by nine steps of NK proliferating system. The most microorganisms were shown higher resistance of acidity and bile salt. High antibacterial activities against Bacillus subtilis, Lactobacillus plantarum and Enterococcus faecium were observed, but was not against Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Total egg production of the treatment was significantly higher than control group but was not statistically different between 0.1% and 0.2% treatments (P>0.05). Average egg weight of the treatment in early laying term was also significantly higher than control but was not significantly different between 0.1% and 0.2% treatments (P>0.05). But the egg weight of the treatment in middle laying term was significantly higher than control and between 0.1% and 0.2% treatments (P>0.05). The mortality of 0.2% treatment was significantly lower than control (P<0.05), and 0.2% treatment in the early laying term was tended to decreased than 0.1% treatment and control. But there was not significantly between 0.1% and 0.2% treatments in middle laying term. In feed intake, 0.2% treatment in middle laying term was significantly increased than control and 0.1% treatment (P<0.05) but not in early laying term. In faecal examination, the total number of Lactobacillus of 0.1% treatment was significantly increased than control in whole laying term (P<0.05), but Coli form of the treatment was decreased than control in middle laying term. In conclusion, dietary long term supplementation of multiple probiotics improved performance of lay hens, egg weight and mortality drop by regulating enteric bacteria.

본 연구는 복합 생균제를 사료 공급을 통하여 갈색 산란계(Hy-Line Brown)에 산란 초기 21~40주, 산란 중기인 41~65주로 나누어 산란계의 생산성과 산란에 미치는 영향을 조사하였다. 복합 생균제를 생산하고 생균제를 구성하는 균주의 특성에 대하여 내산성(pH 2.5), 내담즙성(Oxgall 0.3%) 및 특정 병원균에 대한 항균력을 시험하였고, 산란 시기별로 분변 내 미생물의 변화를 조사하였다. 생균제는 4종의 복합생균으로 각각의 대두박 기질에 의한 고상식 발효물로서 원료에서 생산까지 9단계 과정을 거쳐 생산하였다. 복합 생균제를 구성하는 Bacillus subtilis, Lactobacillus plantarum, Enterococcus faecium에서 높은 내산성, 내담즙성, 항균력 등이 나타나는 것을 확인하였으며, Saccharomyces cerevisiae는 항균력이 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 산란 생산성은 급여 후 대조구에 비해 높은 산란율을 보였으나, 0.1% 급여구와 0.2% 급여구 사이의 유의차는 없었다(P>0.05). 난중에 있어서 산란 초기 21~40주는 대조구와 유의차를 보였으나, 0.1% 급여구와 0.2% 급여구간에는 유의차가 인정되지 않았다(P>0.05). 그러나 산란 중기에서 0.2% 급여구와 0.1% 급여구 사이에 유의차를 보였으며, 대조구와도 유의성 각각 인정되었다(P<0.05). 폐사율은 대조구와 비교하였을 때 0.2% 급여구에서 폐사율이 격감되는 유의차가 있었고(P<0.05) 산란 시기별로는 산란 초기에 0.2% 급여구가 폐사율 감소를 보였으나, 산란 중기에는 0.1% 급여구와의 유의차가 나타나지 않았다. 사료 섭취량은 산란 전기에는 유의성이 없었으나, 산란 후기의 0.2% 급여구에서 유의적인 증가가 인정되었다(P<0.05). 분변 미생물 조사에서 복합 생균제 급여 후 0.1% 급여구의 전기, 중기 모두 Lactobacillus가 유의적으로 증가되었으나, Coli form은 중기에 0.1%, 0.2% 급여구에서 각각 유의적으로 감소하는 경향을 나타내었다(P<0.05). 결론적으로 산란계 사료 내 복합 생균제의 첨가는 산란율과 난중의 향상과 분변 미생물의 정상적인 변화로 폐사율을 감소시키는 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Aiba Y, Suzuki N, Kabir AMA, Takagi A and Koga Y 1998 Lactic acid-mediated suppression of Helicobacter pylori by the oral administration of Lactobacillus salivarius as a probiotic in a gnotobiotic murine model. Am J Gastroenterol 93: 2097-2101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.00600.x
  2. Annuk H, Shchepetova J, Kullisaar T, Songisepp E, Zilmer M, Mikelsaar M 2003 Characterization of intestinal Lactobacilli as putative probiotic candidates. J Appl Microbiol 94:403-412. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01847.x
  3. Baba E, Nagaishi S, Fukata T, Arakawa A 1991 The role of intestinal microflora on the prevention of salmonella clonization in gnotobiotic chickens. Poultry Sci 70:1902-1907. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0701902
  4. Bussarin K, Sudip KR 2006 Microbial and processing criteria for production of probiotics: A Review Food Biotechnol 44(3):371-379.
  5. Cerniglia GJ, Goodling AC, Hebert JA 1983 The response of layers to feeding Lactobacillus fermentation productions. Poultry Sci 62:1339(Abstract).
  6. Duncan DB 1955 Multiple range and multiple F test. Biometric 11:1-4. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478
  7. Francis C, Janky DM, Arafa AS, Harms RH 1978 Interrelationship of Lactobacillus and zinc bacitracin in the diets of turkey poults. Poultry Sci 57:1687-1689. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0571687
  8. Fuller R 1973 Ecological studies on the Lactobacillus flora associating with the crop epithelium of the fowl. J Appl Bacteriol 36:131-139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1973.tb04080.x
  9. Fuller R 1989 Probiotics in man and animals. J Appl Bact 66:365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1989.tb05105.x
  10. Goodling AC, Cerniglia GJ, Hebert JA 1987 Production performance of White Leghorn layers fed Lactobacillus fermentation products. Poultry Sci 66:480-486. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0660480
  11. Haddadin M, Abdulrahim SM, Hashlamoun EAR, Robinson RK 1996 The effect of Lactobacillus acidophillus on the production and chemical composition of hen's eggs. Poultry Sci 75:491-494. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0750491
  12. Lee HJ, Park CS, Joo YJ, Kim SH, Yoon JH, Park YH, Hwan IK, Ahn HS, Mheen TI 1999 Identification and characterization of bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria isolated from kimchi. Korean J Microbiol Biotechnol 9:282-291.
  13. Mahdavi AH, Rahmani HR, Pourreza J 2005 Effect of probiotic supplements on egg quality and laying hen's performance. Int J Poult Sci 4:488-492. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2005.488.492
  14. Martin SA, Nisbet DJ 1992 Effect of direct-fed microbials on rumen microbial fermentation. J Dairy Sci 75:1736. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)77932-6
  15. Nahashon SN, Nakaue HS, Mirosh LW 1993 Effects of directfed microbials on nutrient retention and production parameters of sigle comb White Leghorn pullets. Poultry Sci 72(suppl 1):87(abstract).
  16. NRC 1994 Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th ed. National Academy Press, Washington DC.
  17. SAS Institute, 1996. SAS/STAT Software for PC, Release 6.12. SAS Institute Inc Cary NC USA.
  18. Timmerman HM, Koning CJ, Mulder L, Rombouts FM, Beynen AC 2004 Mono-strain, multi-strain and multi-species probiotics: A comparison of functionality and efficacy. J Food Microbiol 96:219-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.05.012
  19. Tortuero F, Fernandez E 1995 Effects of inclusion of microbial cultures barley-based diets feed to laying hans. Animal Feed Sci Technol 53:255-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(94)00747-W
  20. Watkins BA, Kratzer FH 1984 Drinking water treatment with commercial preparation of a concentrated Lactobacillus culture for broiler chickens. Poultry Sci 63:1671-1673. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0631671
  21. Weinack OM, Snoeyenbos GH, Soerjadi-Liem AS 1985 Further studies on competitive exclusion of Salmonella typhimurium by Lactobacili in chickens Avian Dis 29:1273-1276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1590485
  22. 김유진 장서정 박정민 김창욱 박영서 2009 사료용 생균제 개 발을 위한 마늘내성 유산균의 분리. 산업식품공학 13(4): 352-359.
  23. 백인기 1989 생균제(Probiotics)의 사용효과. 한국영양사료학회지 13:175-183.

Cited by

  1. Effect of Dietary Garlic-husk Probiotics on Laying Hens Performance and Egg Quality vol.49, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14397/jals.2015.49.1.137
  2. Application of Ecklonia cava Kjellman by-product as a feed additive: enhancing weight gain, immunity and protection from Salmonella infection in chickens vol.56, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14405/kjvr.2016.56.4.255