보증신용장통일규칙과 청구보증통일규칙 비교분석

A Comparative Analysis regarding Difference of ISP98 and URDG758

  • 박세운 (창원대학교 경영학과, ICC Korea 국제금융위원회) ;
  • 한기문 (한남대학교 무역학과, ICC Korea 국제금융위원회)
  • 투고 : 2011.07.30
  • 심사 : 2011.08.23
  • 발행 : 2011.08.31

초록

There are two typical international rules in issuing guarantee for obligations of party which is responsible to provide some duties such as services, construction, plants, loan repayment, etc. The two internationally recognized rules are currently ISP98 and URDG758. ISP98 was firstly introduced in 1998 for American banks to issue standby letter of credit domestic and overseas for the area where UCP does not cover. URDG was introduced first in 1991 in the name of URDG458 but it has not been widely used and therefore new URDG named URDG758 came out in 2010 to accommodate more standard guarantee practice. At the face of these two prevailing international rules, the users are sometimes confused which rule would be more suitable for their individual transaction. This led us to conduct a comparative analysis on these two rules. Our study suggests that URDG758 is more adequate for construction, ship-building and plants-supply obligations whilst ISP98 is for financial obligations. Also attentions are required when issues such as counter guarantee, governing rule, presentation period, document examination period and default statement exist. This is because ISP98 and URDG758 have different view points.

키워드