Journal of Magnetics

The Korean Magnetics Society (한국자기학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Hybrid ON/OFF Method for Fast Solution of Electromagnetic Inverse Problems Based on Topological Sensitivity

  • Kim, Dong-Hun (Department of Electrical Engineering, Kyungpook Nat'l. Univ.) ;
  • Byun, Jin-Kyu (School of Electrical Engineering, Soongsil University)
  • Received : 2011.05.03
  • Accepted : 2011.09.14
  • Published : 2011.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A new hybrid ON/OFF method is presented for the fast solution of electromagnetic inverse problems in high frequency domains. The proposed method utilizes both topological sensitivity (TS) and material sensitivity (MS) to update material properties in unit design cells. MS provides smooth design space and stable convergence, while TS enables sudden changes of material distribution when MS slows down. This combination of two sensitivities enables a reduction in total computation time. The TS and MS analyses are based on a variational approach and an adjoint variable method (AVM), which permits direct calculation of both sensitivity values from field solutions of the primary and adjoint systems. Investigation of the formulations of TS and MS reveals that they have similar forms, and implementation of the hybrid ON/OFF method that uses both sensitivities can be achieved by one optimization module. The proposed method is applied to dielectric material reconstruction problems, and the results show the feasibility and effectiveness of the method.

Keywords

References

  1. J.-K. Byun, H.-B. Lee, H.-S. Kim, and D.-H. Kim, J. Magnetics 16, 77 (2011). https://doi.org/10.4283/JMAG.2011.16.1.077
  2. Y. Okamoto, M. Ohtake, and N. Takahashi, IEEE Trans. Magn. 41, 1788 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2005.845985
  3. K. Akiyama, D. Miyagi, and N. Takahashi, IEEE Trans. Magn. 42, 2431 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2006.878678
  4. Y. Okamoto, K. Akiyama, and N. Takahashi, IEEE Trans. Magn. 42, 1087 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2006.871422
  5. A. Schumacher, V. V. Kobolev, and H. A. Eschenauer, J. Struct. Optim. 8, 42 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01742933
  6. J. Cea, S. Garreau, P. Guillaume, and M. Masmoudi, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 188, 713 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00357-6
  7. M. Masmoudi, J. Pommier, and B. Samet, Inverse Problems 21, 547 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/21/2/008
  8. D.-H. Kim, S. B. Lee, B. M. Kwak, H.-G. Kim, and D. A. Lowther, IEEE Trans. Magn. 44, 1002 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2007.915321
  9. N.-S. Choi, D.-H. Kim, G. Jeung, J.-G. Park, and J.-K Byun, IEEE Trans. Magn. 46, 2771 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2010.2044565
  10. J. Pommier and B. Samet, SIAM J. Control Optim. 43, 899 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1137/S036301290241616X