DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Results of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Support before Coronary Reperfusion in Cardiogenic Shock with Acute Myocardial Infarction

  • Chung, Eui-Suk (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University) ;
  • Lim, Cheong (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Hae-Young (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kosin University Gospel Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Jin-Ho (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Eulji University Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Jeong-Sang (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul Metropolitan Boramae Hospital, Seoul National University) ;
  • Park, Kay-Hyun (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
  • Received : 2010.09.30
  • Accepted : 2011.03.30
  • Published : 2011.08.05

Abstract

Despite aggressive treatment, the mortality rate of cardiogenic shock with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is high. We performed extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) prior to coronary reperfusion, and evaluated the early clinical results and risk factors. Materials and Methods: From May 2006 to November 2009, we reviewed the medical records of 20 patients in cardiogenic shock with AMI (mean age $67.7{\pm}11.7$ yrs, M : F 14 : 6). After initially performing ECMO using the CAPIOX emergency bypass system ($EBS^{(R)}$Terumo, Tokyo, Japan), patients underwent coronary reperfusion (coronary artery bypass grafting, 13; percutaneous coronary intervention, 7). Results: All patients were in a cardiogenic shock state, cardiopulmonary resuscitations (CPR) were performed for fourteen patients (mean CPR time $20.8{\pm}26.0$ min). The mean time from vascular access to the initiation of ECMO was $17.2{\pm}9.4$ min and mean support time was $3.8{\pm}4.0$ days. Fourteen patients were able to be weaned from ECMO and ten patients were discharged (mean admission duration $50.1{\pm}31.6$ days). Patients survived on average $476.6{\pm}374.6$ days of follow-up. Longer CPR and support time, increased cardiac enzyme, lower ejection fraction, lower albumin, and major complications were the risk factors of mortality (p<0.05). Conclusion: The early application of ECMO prior to coronary reperfusion and control of risk factors allowed for good clinical results in cardiogenic shock with AMI.

Keywords

References

  1. Bhayana JN, Scott SM, Sethi GK, Takaro T. Effects of intraaortic balloon pumping on organ perfusion in cardiogenic shock. J Surg Res 1979;26:108-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4804(79)90086-6
  2. Mehta SM, Aufiero TX, Pae WE Jr, Miller CA, Pierce WS. Mechanical ventricular assistance: an economical and effective means of treating end-stage heart disease. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:284-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(95)00445-Q
  3. Hill JG, Bruhn PS, Cohen SE, et al. Emergent applications of cardiopulmonary support: a multiinstitutional experience. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;54:699-704. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(92)91014-Z
  4. Reichman RT, Joyo CI, Dembitsky WP, et al. Improved patient survival after cardiac arrest using a cardiopulmonary support system. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;49:101-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(90)90363-B
  5. Matsuwaka R, Sakakibara T, Shintani H, et al. Emergency cardiopulmonary bypass support in patients with severe cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. Heart Vessels 1996;11:27-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01744596
  6. Suarez de Lezo J, Pan M, Medina A, et al. Percutaneous cardiopulmonary support in critical patients needing coronary interventions with stents. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002;57:467-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.10340
  7. Rhee I, Kwon SU, Sung K, et al. Experiences with emergency percutaneous cardiopulmonary support in in-hospital cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock due to the ischemic heart disease. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;39: 201-7.
  8. Ryu KM, Kim SH, Seo PW, et al. Initial experience of the emergency bypass system (EBS(R)) for the patients with cardiogenic shock due to an acute myocardial infarction. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;41:329-34.
  9. Sung K, Lee YT, Park PW, et al. Improved survival after cardiac arrest using emergent autopriming percutaneous cardiopulmonary support. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:651-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.03.017
  10. Sarkar K, Kini AS. Percutaneous left ventricular support devices. Cardiol Clin 2010;28:169-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccl.2009.09.007
  11. Chen YS, Lin JW, Yu HY, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with assisted extracorporeal life-support versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults with in-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study and propensity analysis. Lancet 2008;372:554-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60958-7
  12. Prodhan P, Fiser RT, Dyamenahalli U, et al. Outcomes after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) following refractory pediatric cardiac arrest in the intensive care unit. Resuscitation 2009;80:1124-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.07.004
  13. Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction). Circulation 2004;110: 588-636. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000134791.68010.FA
  14. Burkle CM, Nuttall GA, Rihal CS. Cardiopulmonary bypass support for percutaneous coronary interventions: what the anesthesiologist needs to know. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2005;19:501-4. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2004.10.003
  15. Vainer J, van Ommen V, Maessen J, Geskes G, Lamerichs L, Waltenberger J. Elective high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions supported by extracorporeal life support. Am J Cardiol 2007;99:771-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.10.034
  16. Rastan AJ, Dege A, Mohr M, et al. Early and late outcomes of 517 consecutive adult patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;139:302-11, 311.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.10.043
  17. Bakhtiary F, Keller H, Dogan S, et al. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: clinical experiences in 45 adult patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:382-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.08.007
  18. Song SW, Yang HS, Lee S, Youn YN, Yoo KJ. Earlier application of percutaneous cardiopulmonary support rescues patients from severe cardiopulmonary failure using the APACHE III scoring system. J Korean Med Sci 2009;24: 1064-70. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2009.24.6.1064
  19. Zhang R, Kofidis T, Kamiya H, et al. Creatine kinase isoenzyme MB relative index as predictor of mortality on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock in adult patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:617-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.07.016
  20. Hsu PS, Chen JL, Hong GJ, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock after cardiac surgery: predictors of early mortality and outcome from 51 adult patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;37:328-33.

Cited by

  1. Mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock vol.26, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2012.05.001
  2. Cardiogenic Shock and the ICU Patient vol.14, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1177/175114371301400312
  3. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults: experience from the Middle East vol.21, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1177/0218492312460858
  4. Cardiac arrhythmias in acute coronary syndromes: position paper from the joint EHRA, ACCA, and EAPCI task force vol.16, pp.11, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euu208
  5. Cardiac arrhythmias in acute coronary syndromes: position paper from the joint EHRA, ACCA, and EAPCI task force vol.10, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4244/eijy14m08_19
  6. Myocardial protection of early extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock in pigs vol.30, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-014-0564-x
  7. Rescue extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock vol.11, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5114/pwki.2015.55605
  8. Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: An Algorithm‐Based Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Program Can Improve Clinical Outcomes vol.40, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.12538
  9. Predictors of Outcomes in Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock vol.26, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1097/crd.0000000000000190
  10. Concomitant Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Use in Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis vol.11, pp.9, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.118.006930
  11. Effect of an intra-aortic balloon pump with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on mortality of patients with cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis† vol.55, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezy304
  12. Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting after Extracorporeal Life Support in Patients with Cardiac Arrest or Cardiogenic Shock vol.52, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2019.52.2.70
  13. Optimal Strategy and Timing of Left Ventricular Venting During Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Life Support for Adults in Cardiogenic Shock : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis vol.12, pp.11, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1161/circheartfailure.119.006486
  14. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Use in Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States, 2000 to 2014 vol.12, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1161/circheartfailure.119.005929
  15. Optimal Timing of Venoarterial-Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Suffering From Refractory Cardiogenic Shock vol.84, pp.9, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.cj-20-0259
  16. Extracorporeal life support in the multidisciplinary management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction vol.95, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28316
  17. Prognostic significance of intra-aortic balloon pumping support in patients with acute myocardial infarction and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy vol.79, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.10.011