Residual Vibration Control of High Speed Take-out Robot Used for Handling of Injection Mold Plastic Part

고속운동 플라스틱 금형사출 부품 취출 로봇의 잔류진동 제어

  • Received : 2011.07.15
  • Accepted : 2011.08.03
  • Published : 2011.09.01

Abstract

Take-out robots used for handling of the plastic parts manufactured with the injection mold are usually the gantry type that consists of long and thin links, The performance of the take-out robot is determined by the speed of the motion and the positioning accuracy to grab the part out of the mold, As the speed of the robot increases the flexure in the links of the take-out robot becomes more significant and it results in more residual vibration, The residual vibration deteriorates the positioning accuracy and compels the operator to slow down the motion of the robot. The typical method to reduce the vibration in the robot requires stiffening the links and/or slowing down the robot, Vibration control could achieve the desired performance without increasing the manufacturing cost or the operation cost that would be incurred otherwise, Considering the point-to-point nature of the task to be performed by the take-out robot the time-delay command (or input) shaping filter approach would be the most effective control method to be adopted among a few available control schemes. In this paper a direct adaptive command shaping filter (ACSF) algorithm has been modified and applied to design the optimal command shaping filters for various configuration of the take-out robot. Optimal filters designed by ACSF algorithm have been implemented on a take-out robot and the effectiveness of the designed filters in terms of vibration suppression has been verified for multiple positions of the robot.

Keywords

References

  1. Singer, N. C. and Seering, W. P., "Preshaping Command Inputs to Reduce System Vibration," ASME J. of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, Vol. 112, No. 1, pp. 76-82, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2894142
  2. Singer, N. C., Singhose, W. and Seering, W., "Comparison of Filtering Methods for Reducing Residual Vibrations," European J. of Control, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 208-218, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0947-3580(99)70155-X
  3. Magee, D. P. and Book, W. J., "Optimal Filtering to Minimize Elastic Behavior in Serial Lnk Manipulators," Proc. of American Control Conference, pp. 2652-2656, 1998.
  4. Rhim, S. and Book, W. J., "Adaptive Time-delay Command Shaping Filter for Flexible Manipulator Control," IEEE/ASME Trans. on Mechatronics, Vol. 9, No. 4 , pp. 619-626, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2004.839046
  5. Rhim, S., and Book, W. J., "Noise Effect on Timedomain Adaptive Command Shaping Methods for Flexible Manipulator Control," IEEE Trans. on Control System Technology, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 84-92, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1109/87.896749
  6. Park, J. and Rhim, S., "Extraction of Optimal Time- Delay in Adaptive Command Shaping Filter for Flexible Manipulator Control," J. of Inst. of Control, Robotics and Systems, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 564-572, 2008. https://doi.org/10.5302/J.ICROS.2008.14.6.564
  7. Tzes, A. and Yurkovich, S., "An Adaptive Input Shaping Control Scheme for Vibration Suppression in Slewing Flexible Structures," IEEE Trans. on Control System Technology, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 114-121, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1109/87.238404
  8. Bodson, M., "An Adaptive Algorithm for the Tuning of Two Input Shaping Methods," Automatica, Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 771-776, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-1098(98)00004-1
  9. Haykin, S., "Adaptive Filter Theory," Prentice Hall, 1996.
  10. Ljung, L., "System Identification-Theory for the User," Prentice Hall, 1996.