DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Growth Performance, Carcass Traits and Meat Quality of Slower-growing and Fast-growing Chickens Raised with and without Outdoor Access

  • Mikulski, Dariusz (Department of Poultry Science, Faculty of Animal Bioengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury) ;
  • Celej, Joanna (Department of Poultry Science, Faculty of Animal Bioengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury) ;
  • Jankowski, Jan (Department of Poultry Science, Faculty of Animal Bioengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury) ;
  • Majewska, Teresa (Department of Poultry Science, Faculty of Animal Bioengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury) ;
  • Mikulska, Marzena (Department of Poultry Science, Faculty of Animal Bioengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury)
  • Received : 2011.02.16
  • Accepted : 2011.06.08
  • Published : 2011.10.01

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of genotype (slower-growing vs. fast-growing) and production system (access to outdoors vs. indoor) on the growth performance, carcass yield and meat quality (chemical composition, physicochemical and sensory properties) of chickens. The experiment was performed on 1,040 day-old hybrid male chickens of two genotypes. Slower-growing chickens (Hubbard JA957, certified) and fast-growing chickens (Hubbard F15) were fed identical diets until 65 days of age. Both genotypes (each represented by 520 birds) were divided into two subgroups and were raised in pens on litter with outdoor access or in indoor confinement without outdoor access (four replications per subgroup, each of 65 birds). Until day 21, the birds stayed in the indoor facility, in deep-litter pens. The birds could forage on pasture 12 h daily, commencing at three weeks of age. Stocking density was 0.13 $m^2$ floor space per bird in pens on litter, and 0.8 $m^2$ per bird in grassy yards. Compared with fast-growing, slower-growing chickens were significantly lighter (by 17%), had a lower breast and thigh muscle yield and a higher abdominal fat content, but they were characterized by higher survival rates at 65 days, a higher protein content and a lower fat content of breast meat. Outdoor access had no negative effects on the growth performance, muscle yield, the fatty acid profile and oxidative status of meat lipids. The meat of free-range chickens was darker in color, it had a higher protein content and a better water-holding capacity, but it was less juicy than the meat of birds raised indoors.

Keywords

References

  1. Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 15th Edn. Ed. Ass. Off. Analyt. Chemists, Washington.
  2. Bassler, A. and P. Ciszuk P. 2002. Pilot studies in organic broiler production - management and cross-breeds. Ekologiskt lantbruk 34.
  3. Berri, C., N. Wacrenier, N. Millet and E. Le Bihan-Duval. 2001. Effect of selection for improved body composition on muscle and meat characteristics of broilers from experimental and commercial lines. Poult. Sci. 80:833-838. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.7.833
  4. Castellini, C., C. Berri, E. Le Bihan-Duval and G. Martino. 2008. Qualitative attributes and consumer perception of organic and free-range poultry meat. World's Poult. Sci. J. 64:500-513. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933908000172
  5. Castellini, C., A. Dal Bosco, C. Mugnai and M. Bernardini. 2002a. Performance and behaviour of chickens with different growing rate reared according to the organic system. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 1:291-300.
  6. Castellini, C., A. Dal Bosco, C. Mugnai and M. Pedrazzoli. 2006. Comparision of two chicken genotypes organically reared: oxidative stability and other qualitative traits of the meat. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 5:29-42.
  7. Castellini, C., C. Mugnai and A. Dal Bosco. 2002b. Effect of organic production system on broiler carcas and meat quality. Meat Sci. 60:219-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00124-3
  8. Castellini, C., C. Mugnai and A. Dal Bosco. 2002c. Meat quality of three chicken genotypes reared according to the organic system. Ital. J. Food Sci. 14:401-412.
  9. Commission Internationale de l'E´ clairage (CIE). 1978. Recommendations on uniform color spaces, color-difference equations, psychometric color terms. Suppl. 2 to CIE Publ. No. 15 (E-1.3.1.) 1971/(TC-1-3). Central Bureau of the Commission Internationale de l'E´ clairage, Paris, France.
  10. Cross, H. R., R. Moen and S. Stanfield. 1978. Guidelines for cookery and sensory evaluation of meat. American Meat Society Association (Ed.) Chicago.
  11. Debut, M., C. Berri, E. Baeza, N. Sellier, C. Arnould, D. Guemene, N. Jehl, B. Boutten, Y. Jego, C. Beamont and E. Le Bihan-Duval. 2003. Variation of chicken technological meat quality in relation to genotype and pre slaughter stress conditions. Poult. Sci. 82:1829-1838. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.12.1829
  12. Fanatico, A. C., L. C. Cavitt, P. B. Pillai, J. L. Emmert and C. M. Owens. 2005. Evaluation of slower-growing broiler genotypes grown with and without outdoor access: meat quality. Poult. Sci. 84:1785-1790. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.11.1785
  13. Fanatico, A. C., P. B. Pillai, L. C. Cavitt, J. L. Emmert, J. F. Meullenet and C. M. Owens. 2006. Evaluation of slower-growing broiler genotypes grown with and without outdoor access: sensory attributes. Poult. Sci. 85:337-343. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.2.337
  14. Fanatico, A. C., P. B. Pillai, J. L. Emmert, E. E. Gbur, J. F. Meullenet and C. M. Owens. 2007a. Sensory attributes of slow- and fast-growing chicken genotypes raised indoors or with outdoor access. Poult. Sci. 86:2441-2449. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00092
  15. Fanatico, A. C., P. B. Pillai, J. L. Emmert and C. M. Owens. 2007b. Meat quality of slow- and fast-growing chicken genotypes fed low-nutrient or standard diets and raised indoors or with outdoor access. Poult. Sci. 86:2245-2255. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.10.2245
  16. Fletcher, D. L. 2002. Poultry meat quality. World's Poult. Sci. J. 58:131-145. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS20020013
  17. Gordon, S. H. and D. R. Charles. 2002. Niche and organic chicken products. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham.
  18. Grashorn, M. A. 2006. Fattening performance, carcass and meat quality of slow and fast growing broiler strains under intensive and extensive feeding conditions. Page 249 in XII Eur. Poult. Conf., Verona, Italy. (Ed. I. Romboli, D. Flock, and A. Franchini). World's Poult. Sci. Assoc., Italian Branch, Bologna, Italy.
  19. Grashorn, M. A. and G. Brose. 1997. Quality assurance in label programs for chicken meat. Poultry meat quality. Proc. XIII Europ. Symp. Quality Poult. Meat. 21-26 September, 1997, Poznan, Poland: pp. 619-624.
  20. Grunert, K. G., L. Bredahl and K. Brunso. 2004. Consumer perception of meat quality and implications for product development in the meat sector - a review. Meat Sci. 69:259-272.
  21. Havenstein, G. B., P. R. Ferket and M. A. Qureshi. 2003. Carcass composition and yield of 1957 versus 2001 broiler when fed representative 1957 and 2001 broiler diets. Poult. Sci. 82:1509-1518. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.10.1509
  22. Hermansen, J. E. 2003. Organic livestock production systems and appropriate development in relation to public expectations. Livest. Prod. Sci. 80:3-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00313-5
  23. Honikel, K. O. 1998. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Sci. 49:447-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00034-5
  24. Husak, R. L., J. G. Sebranek and K. A. Bregendahl. 2008. Survey of commercially available broilers marketed as organic, freerange, and conventional broilers for cooked meat yields, meat composition and relative value. Poult. Sci. 87:2367-2376. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00294
  25. Janocha, A., M. Osek and A. Milczarek. 2004. The effect of broiler chicken origin on growth performance and post slaughter parameters. Zesz. Nauk. Przegl. Hod. 73:79-85.
  26. Komprda, T., J. Zelenka, E. Fajmonova, A. Jarosova and I. Kubis. 2000. Meat quality of broilers fattened deliberately slow by cereal mixtures to higher age: 1. Growth and sensory quality. Arch. Geflugelkd. 64:167-174.
  27. Latter-Dubois, E. 2000. Poulets fermiers: Leurs qualite's nutritionnelle et organoleptiques et la perception du consommateur. M.S. Faculte' des Sciences de l'Agriculture et de L'Alimentation. Univ. Laval, Quebec, Canada.
  28. Lewis, P. D., G. C. Perry, L. J. Farmer and R. L. S. Patterson. 1997. Responses of two genotypes of chicken to the diets and stocking densities typical of UK and "Label Rouge" systems: I. Performance, behaviour and carcass composition. Meat Sci. 45:501-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(96)00084-8
  29. Lonergan, S. M., N. Deeb, C. A. Fedler and S. J. Lamont. 2003. Breast meat quality and composition in unique chicken populations. Poult. Sci. 82(12):1990-1994. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.12.1990
  30. Muriel, A. and M. R. Pascual. 1995. Carcass and meat characteristics from free-range chickens. Proc. XII Europ. Symp. Quality Poult. Meat. 25-29 September, 1995, Zaragoza, Spain: pp. 219-224.
  31. Network for Animal Health and Welfare in Organic Agriculture. 2002. Final recommendation and comments. http://www.veeru.reading.ac.uk/organic/
  32. Nielsen, B. L., M. G. Thomsen, D. B. Sorensen and J. F. Young. 2003. Feed and strain effects on the use of outdoor areas by broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 44:161-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/0007166031000088389
  33. Oeckel, M. J. van, N. Warnants and Ch. V. Bouquee. 1999. Comparison of different methods for measuring water holding capacity and juiciness of pork versus on-line screening methods. Meat Sci. 5:1313-320.
  34. Peisker, K. 1964. A rapid semi-micro method for preparation of methyl esters from triglycerides using chloroform, methanol, sulphuric acid. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 11:87-90.
  35. Peter, W., S. Danicke, H. Jeroch, M. Wicke and G. von Lengerken. 1997. Influence of intensity of nutrition on selected parameters of carcass and meat quality of French Label type chickens. Arch. Geflugelkd. 61:110-116.
  36. Pietrzak, D., J. Mroczek, E. Lesnik and E. Swierczewska. 2006. Quality of meat and fat from three breeding lines of chickens served feed with or without antibiotic growth stimulator. Med. Wet. 62:917-921.
  37. Pikul, J., D. E. Leszczynski and F. A. Kummerow. 1989. Evaluation of three modified TBA methods for measuring lipid oxidation in chicken meat. J. Agric. Food Chem. 37:1309-1313. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00089a022
  38. Santos, A. L., N. K. Sakomura, E. R. Freitas, C. M. S. Fortes and E. N. M. Carrilho. 2005. Comparison of free range broiler chicken strains raised in confined or semi-confined systems. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 7:85-92.
  39. StatSoft Inc. Statistica (data analysis software system). 2007. version 8.0 www.statsoft.com.
  40. Tang, H., Y. Z. Gong, C. X. Wu, J. Jiang, Y. Wang and K. Li. 2009. Variation of meat quality traits among five genotypes of chicken. Poult. Sci. 88:2212-2218. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00036
  41. Wang, K. H., S. R. Shi, T. C. Dou and H. J. Sun. 2009. Effect of a free-range raising system on growth performance, carcass yield, and meat quality of slow-growing chicken. Poult. Sci. 88:2219-2223. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00423

Cited by

  1. Effects of access to pasture on performance, carcass composition, and meat quality in broilers: A meta-analysis1 vol.93, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03499
  2. Quality Function Deployment in the Organic Animal Food Sector: Application to Poultry Meat vol.14, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2015.4050
  3. High-throughput sequencing technology to reveal the composition and function of cecal microbiota in Dagu chicken vol.16, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0877-2
  4. 4. Quality of Poultry Meat from Native Chicken Breeds – A Review vol.16, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1515/aoas-2016-0004
  5. Comparison of Carcass Characteristics, Meat Quality, and Blood Parameters of Slow and Fast Grown Female Broiler Chickens Raised in Organic or Conventional Production System vol.29, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0812
  6. Comparison of growth performance and carcass traits of Japanese quails reared in conventional, pasture, and organic conditions vol.45, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902016000100002
  7. Linhagens de frangos caipiras criadas em sistema semi-intensivo em região de clima quente vol.51, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-204x2016001200012
  8. Use of n-alkanes for determination of Kikuyu grass (Pennisetum clandestinum) intake in free-range broilers vol.56, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14778
  9. Poultry meat production in free-range systems: perspectives for tropical areas vol.73, pp.02, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933917000034
  10. Influence of swimming time in alleviating the deleterious effects of hot summer on growing Muscovy duck performance vol.96, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex207
  11. The Effect of Grass Pasture on the Performance of Slowly Growing Chickens vol.64, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201664051435
  12. Artificial selection for improved energy efficiency is reaching its limits in broiler chickens vol.8, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19231-2
  13. Fattening performance and meat quality of Pekin ducks under different rearing systems vol.74, pp.01, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1017/S004393391700099X
  14. Current state and achievements in poultry production in the Republic of Serbia and its future perspectives in line with EU standards pp.1743-4777, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933918000715
  15. Carcass Quality, Meat Quality and Sensory Properties of the Dual-Purpose Chicken Lohmann Dual vol.7, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/foods7100156
  16. Effects of aging on characteristics of breast meat from free-range broiler hens at 12 or 70 weeks of age vol.58, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16523
  17. Effects of a meal feeding regimen and the availability of fresh alfalfa on growth performance and meat and bone quality of broiler genotypes vol.59, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2018.1440378
  18. Meat quality of chicken of different crossings in alternative system vol.70, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-9401
  19. Comparison of Meat Quality and Fatty Acid Profile in Slow-Growing Chicken Genotypes Fed Diets Supplemented with Origanum Vulgare or Melissa Officinalis Leaves Under the Organic System vol.12, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2013.e64
  20. Growth performance, carcass traits and physical properties of chicken meat as affected by genotype and production system vol.58, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-58-325-2015
  21. Effects of different raising systems on growth performance, carcass, and meat quality of medium-growing chickens vol.45, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2016.1190735
  22. The effects of access to pasture on growth performance, behavioural patterns, some blood parameters and carcass yield of a slow-growing broiler genotype vol.45, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2016.1214136
  23. Poultry Meat Quality in Relation to Muscle Growth and Muscle Fiber Characteristics vol.37, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.6.873
  24. Influence of rearing system and sex on carcass traits and meat quality of broiler chickens vol.47, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2019.1634076
  25. The effect of herbal feed additive on the growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of broiler chickens fed low-energy diets vol.62, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-62-33-2019
  26. The Effect of Slaughter Age and the Diet in the Final Growth Phase of Poulards on Productivity and Meat Quality vol.19, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2019-0012
  27. Effects of rearing systems on growth performance, carcass yield, meat quality, lymphoid organ indices, and serum biochemistry of Wannan Yellow chickens vol.90, pp.7, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13220
  28. Effects of Spirogyra jaoensis as a dietary supplement on growth, pectoralis muscle performance, and small intestine morphology of broiler chickens vol.12, pp.8, 2011, https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2019.1233-1239
  29. Slow-growing male chickens fit poultry production systems with outdoor access vol.75, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043933919000400
  30. Performance, Behavior, and Welfare Status of Six Different Organically Reared Poultry Genotypes vol.10, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040550
  31. DESENVOLVIMENTO E AVALIAÇÃO DAS CONDIÇÕES CLIMÁTICAS DENTRO DE UM EDIFÍCIO DE AVES SUSTENTÁVEL vol.14, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.18011/bioeng2020v14n3p309-320
  32. Productive performance and carcass yield of egg type male chickens raised with outdoor access in the tropics vol.52, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02348-w
  33. Slaughter yield, quality of meat from broiler chickens of different origin and age on diet with extruded or meal soybean vol.49, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2021.1979559
  34. Comparison of performance and carcass composition of a novel slow-growing crossbred broiler with fast-growing broiler for chicken meat in Australia vol.100, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.12.063
  35. Association of the Locus A3971G of Insulin Gene with Some Economic Traits in Local Noi Chicken Breed vol.15, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3923/ajas.2021.75.84
  36. Extensive Rearing Systems in Poultry Production: The Right Chicken for the Right Farming System. A Review of Twenty Years of Scientific Research in Perugia University, Italy vol.11, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051281
  37. Effect of age at the onset of natural molting on carcass traits, muscle oxidative stability, and amino acid and fatty acid profiles in commercial laying hens vol.147, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111627
  38. Comparative evaluation of growth performance, carcass characteristics and timed series gene expression profile of GH and IGF‐1 in two Egyptian indigenous chicken breeds versus Rhode Island Red vol.138, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12517
  39. The Assessment of a Multifactorial Score for the Adaptability Evaluation of Six Poultry Genotypes to the Organic System vol.11, pp.10, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102992
  40. Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics and Meat Quality of Organically Reared Broiler Chickens Depending on Sex vol.11, pp.11, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113274
  41. Effects of season, genotype, and rearing system on broiler chickens raised in different semi-intensive systems: performance, mortality, and slaughter results vol.53, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02629-y
  42. Sustainability of Rearing System Using Multicriteria Analysis: Application in Commercial Poultry Production vol.11, pp.12, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123483